闲置资源如何影响研发支出与企业绩效的关系?

Chia-Ling Lee, Hsu-Che Wu
{"title":"闲置资源如何影响研发支出与企业绩效的关系?","authors":"Chia-Ling Lee, Hsu-Che Wu","doi":"10.1111/radm.12141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research and development (R&D) investment affects future operating earnings. Behavioral theory claims that slack resources benefit innovation, whereas agency theory argues that they represent a form of inefficiency and inhibit innovation. This paper thus examines how slack resources affect the relationship between R&D investments and firm performance based on two dimensions of R&D: R&D capital and R&D expenses. R&D capital captures long-term R&D investment, whereas R&D expenses represent R&D investment in the current year. This study is undertaken in Taiwan using a large 5-year dataset within high-tech industries. Slack resources are broadly classified into absorbed slack with low managerial discretion and unabsorbed slack with high managerial discretion. We find that absorbed slack negatively affects the relationship between R&D investments and performance, as proposed by agency theory. We further find that unabsorbed slack has a slightly curvilinear effect on the positive relationship between R&D capital and firm performance. The proposal of behavioral theory thus is more valid when focusing on unabsorbed slack resources. Our findings suggest that it is necessary to identify the types of slack and R&D investments that are being considered when discussing the impacts of R&D investment on performance.","PeriodicalId":236717,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do Slack Resources Affect the Relationship between R&D Expenditures and Firm Performance?\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Ling Lee, Hsu-Che Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/radm.12141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research and development (R&D) investment affects future operating earnings. Behavioral theory claims that slack resources benefit innovation, whereas agency theory argues that they represent a form of inefficiency and inhibit innovation. This paper thus examines how slack resources affect the relationship between R&D investments and firm performance based on two dimensions of R&D: R&D capital and R&D expenses. R&D capital captures long-term R&D investment, whereas R&D expenses represent R&D investment in the current year. This study is undertaken in Taiwan using a large 5-year dataset within high-tech industries. Slack resources are broadly classified into absorbed slack with low managerial discretion and unabsorbed slack with high managerial discretion. We find that absorbed slack negatively affects the relationship between R&D investments and performance, as proposed by agency theory. We further find that unabsorbed slack has a slightly curvilinear effect on the positive relationship between R&D capital and firm performance. The proposal of behavioral theory thus is more valid when focusing on unabsorbed slack resources. Our findings suggest that it is necessary to identify the types of slack and R&D investments that are being considered when discussing the impacts of R&D investment on performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

摘要

研发(R&D)投资影响着未来的经营收益。行为理论认为,闲置资源有利于创新,而代理理论则认为,闲置资源是一种低效的表现,会抑制创新。本文从研发资本和研发费用两个维度考察了资源闲置对企业研发投资与绩效关系的影响。研发资本是长期研发投资,而研发费用是当年的研发投资。本研究以台湾高科技产业为研究对象,采用大型5年数据集进行。闲置资源大致分为具有低管理自由裁量权的可吸收闲置资源和具有高管理自由裁量权的未吸收闲置资源。研究发现,被吸收的冗余对研发投资与绩效之间的关系具有负向影响,这与代理理论一致。我们进一步发现,未吸收的闲置对研发资本与企业绩效之间的正相关关系具有轻微的曲线效应。因此,行为理论的建议在关注未被吸收的闲置资源时更为有效。我们的研究结果表明,在讨论研发投资对绩效的影响时,有必要确定正在考虑的闲置类型和研发投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Do Slack Resources Affect the Relationship between R&D Expenditures and Firm Performance?
Research and development (R&D) investment affects future operating earnings. Behavioral theory claims that slack resources benefit innovation, whereas agency theory argues that they represent a form of inefficiency and inhibit innovation. This paper thus examines how slack resources affect the relationship between R&D investments and firm performance based on two dimensions of R&D: R&D capital and R&D expenses. R&D capital captures long-term R&D investment, whereas R&D expenses represent R&D investment in the current year. This study is undertaken in Taiwan using a large 5-year dataset within high-tech industries. Slack resources are broadly classified into absorbed slack with low managerial discretion and unabsorbed slack with high managerial discretion. We find that absorbed slack negatively affects the relationship between R&D investments and performance, as proposed by agency theory. We further find that unabsorbed slack has a slightly curvilinear effect on the positive relationship between R&D capital and firm performance. The proposal of behavioral theory thus is more valid when focusing on unabsorbed slack resources. Our findings suggest that it is necessary to identify the types of slack and R&D investments that are being considered when discussing the impacts of R&D investment on performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信