日本、大韩民国和中国台湾的私人健康保险

Soonman Kwon, N. Ikegami, Lee Yue-Chune
{"title":"日本、大韩民国和中国台湾的私人健康保险","authors":"Soonman Kwon, N. Ikegami, Lee Yue-Chune","doi":"10.1017/9781139026468.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Japan, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China are neighbouring high-income countries with some similarities in health systems policy. All three have historically organized publicly financed health coverage around the labour market, with the government paying for some or all of the costs of self-employed, retired or poorer people, but Japan has a much higher share of public spending on health and a much lower share of out-of-pocket payments than the other two. All three rely heavily on the private sector to deliver health services. And in all three, private health insurance plays a supplementary role, offering subscribers daily cash benefits in case of hospitalization or lump sum payments in case of severe illness such as cancer. Although private health insurance markets in these countries are marginal in terms of spending on health, they cover relatively large shares of the population. This chapter reviews the origins and development of private health insurance in the three countries and considers why the market is not larger in terms of health spending, especially given the relatively high share of out-of-pocket payments in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China and the widespread use of cost sharing for publicly financed health services in all three countries.","PeriodicalId":187387,"journal":{"name":"Private Health Insurance","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private health insurance in Japan, Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China\",\"authors\":\"Soonman Kwon, N. Ikegami, Lee Yue-Chune\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781139026468.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Japan, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China are neighbouring high-income countries with some similarities in health systems policy. All three have historically organized publicly financed health coverage around the labour market, with the government paying for some or all of the costs of self-employed, retired or poorer people, but Japan has a much higher share of public spending on health and a much lower share of out-of-pocket payments than the other two. All three rely heavily on the private sector to deliver health services. And in all three, private health insurance plays a supplementary role, offering subscribers daily cash benefits in case of hospitalization or lump sum payments in case of severe illness such as cancer. Although private health insurance markets in these countries are marginal in terms of spending on health, they cover relatively large shares of the population. This chapter reviews the origins and development of private health insurance in the three countries and considers why the market is not larger in terms of health spending, especially given the relatively high share of out-of-pocket payments in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China and the widespread use of cost sharing for publicly financed health services in all three countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Private Health Insurance\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Private Health Insurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139026468.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Private Health Insurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139026468.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

日本、韩国和中国台湾是邻近的高收入国家,在卫生系统政策上有一些相似之处。这三个国家历来都是围绕劳动力市场组织公共资助的医疗保险,由政府支付自营职业者、退休人员或较贫困人员的部分或全部费用,但与其他两个国家相比,日本在公共卫生支出中所占比例要高得多,而自付费用所占比例要低得多。这三个国家都严重依赖私营部门提供卫生服务。在这三种情况下,私人健康保险都扮演着补充的角色,在住院治疗的情况下为用户提供每日现金福利,或者在癌症等严重疾病的情况下一次性支付。虽然这些国家的私人健康保险市场在保健支出方面是微不足道的,但它们覆盖了相对较大的人口份额。本章回顾了这三个国家私人医疗保险的起源和发展,并考虑了为什么在医疗支出方面市场没有更大,特别是考虑到大韩民国和中国台湾的自费支付份额相对较高,以及这三个国家普遍采用公共资助的医疗服务费用分摊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Private health insurance in Japan, Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China
Japan, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China are neighbouring high-income countries with some similarities in health systems policy. All three have historically organized publicly financed health coverage around the labour market, with the government paying for some or all of the costs of self-employed, retired or poorer people, but Japan has a much higher share of public spending on health and a much lower share of out-of-pocket payments than the other two. All three rely heavily on the private sector to deliver health services. And in all three, private health insurance plays a supplementary role, offering subscribers daily cash benefits in case of hospitalization or lump sum payments in case of severe illness such as cancer. Although private health insurance markets in these countries are marginal in terms of spending on health, they cover relatively large shares of the population. This chapter reviews the origins and development of private health insurance in the three countries and considers why the market is not larger in terms of health spending, especially given the relatively high share of out-of-pocket payments in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, China and the widespread use of cost sharing for publicly financed health services in all three countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信