{"title":"需要还是恩典?公共当局遵守法院判决的要求","authors":"Imogen Sadler","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2109404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. So said Lord Templeman, in M v Home Office, in what Lord Neuberger was later to describe as ‘characteristically colourful’ language. The title of this article may puzzle the reader, lawyer and lay person alike. The proposition that decisions of the Court must be followed within a democracy seems an obvious one. How else would the checks and balances within a democracy work? It would seem odd if, should a public body fail to comply with an order of a court, no mechanism would be in place to remedy that non-compliance.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Necessity or Grace? The Requirement for Public Authorities to Follow Decisions of the Courts\",\"authors\":\"Imogen Sadler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2109404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. So said Lord Templeman, in M v Home Office, in what Lord Neuberger was later to describe as ‘characteristically colourful’ language. The title of this article may puzzle the reader, lawyer and lay person alike. The proposition that decisions of the Court must be followed within a democracy seems an obvious one. How else would the checks and balances within a democracy work? It would seem odd if, should a public body fail to comply with an order of a court, no mechanism would be in place to remedy that non-compliance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2109404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2109404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Necessity or Grace? The Requirement for Public Authorities to Follow Decisions of the Courts
1. So said Lord Templeman, in M v Home Office, in what Lord Neuberger was later to describe as ‘characteristically colourful’ language. The title of this article may puzzle the reader, lawyer and lay person alike. The proposition that decisions of the Court must be followed within a democracy seems an obvious one. How else would the checks and balances within a democracy work? It would seem odd if, should a public body fail to comply with an order of a court, no mechanism would be in place to remedy that non-compliance.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
