{"title":"导论:在社会理论的背景下理解适应","authors":"E. Keskitalo, B. Preston","doi":"10.4337/9781786432520.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past two decades have witnessed significant evolution of the adaptation research enterprise (Preston et al. 2013; Preston et al. 2015). This is evidenced by the expanded treatment of adaptation in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (IPCC 2014), a development that was enabled by rapid growth in the volume of adaptation literature following the Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2009). A similar expansion of adaptation has also been witnessed in adaptation policy and practice. Although once viewed as a taboo topic (Pielke Jr 1998; Pielke et al. 2007), adaptation is now being institutionalized at a range of geopolitical scales. Adaptation, and particularly adaptation finance, is a major subject of debate within international negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and various funding mechanisms have been developed to support adaptation in developing nations (Grasso 2009; Hulme et al. 2011; Petherick 2012; Schipper and Burton 2009). National governments of developed nations have also initiated strategic thinking regarding adaptation as represented by the United Kingdom’s Climate Change Act (UK Stationery Office 2008) the European Union’s Adaptation Strategy (EU 2013) and Australia’s National Climate Resilience and Adaptation Strategy (Commonwealth of Australia 2015). Such top-down approaches to adaptation are complemented by a broad range of bottom-up efforts represented by local/municipal, and state/district adaptation planning (Lindseth 2005; Measham et al. 2011; Preston and Kay 2010; Saavedra and Budd 2009). Given these developments, one might assume that substantive progress is being made in adaptation policy and practice and, moreover, that some of that progress can be attributed to the ability of adaptation scholarship to help support adaptation decision-making while also shedding light on the complexities of adaptation processes. Yet, rather than accept these assumptions at face value, this Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Policy endeavors to view them through a critical lens. To that","PeriodicalId":394720,"journal":{"name":"Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Policy","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: understanding adaptation in the context of social theory\",\"authors\":\"E. Keskitalo, B. Preston\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781786432520.00007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The past two decades have witnessed significant evolution of the adaptation research enterprise (Preston et al. 2013; Preston et al. 2015). This is evidenced by the expanded treatment of adaptation in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (IPCC 2014), a development that was enabled by rapid growth in the volume of adaptation literature following the Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2009). A similar expansion of adaptation has also been witnessed in adaptation policy and practice. Although once viewed as a taboo topic (Pielke Jr 1998; Pielke et al. 2007), adaptation is now being institutionalized at a range of geopolitical scales. Adaptation, and particularly adaptation finance, is a major subject of debate within international negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and various funding mechanisms have been developed to support adaptation in developing nations (Grasso 2009; Hulme et al. 2011; Petherick 2012; Schipper and Burton 2009). National governments of developed nations have also initiated strategic thinking regarding adaptation as represented by the United Kingdom’s Climate Change Act (UK Stationery Office 2008) the European Union’s Adaptation Strategy (EU 2013) and Australia’s National Climate Resilience and Adaptation Strategy (Commonwealth of Australia 2015). Such top-down approaches to adaptation are complemented by a broad range of bottom-up efforts represented by local/municipal, and state/district adaptation planning (Lindseth 2005; Measham et al. 2011; Preston and Kay 2010; Saavedra and Budd 2009). Given these developments, one might assume that substantive progress is being made in adaptation policy and practice and, moreover, that some of that progress can be attributed to the ability of adaptation scholarship to help support adaptation decision-making while also shedding light on the complexities of adaptation processes. Yet, rather than accept these assumptions at face value, this Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Policy endeavors to view them through a critical lens. To that\",\"PeriodicalId\":394720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Policy\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432520.00007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432520.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
过去二十年见证了适应研究事业的重大演变(Preston et al. 2013;Preston et al. 2015)。政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第五次评估报告(IPCC 2014)扩大了对适应的处理,这一发展得益于第四次评估报告(IPCC 2009)之后适应文献数量的快速增长。适应政策和实践也出现了类似的扩大。虽然曾经被视为禁忌话题(Pielke Jr 1998;Pielke et al. 2007),适应现在正在一系列地缘政治尺度上制度化。适应,特别是适应资金,是联合国气候变化框架公约(UNFCCC)下国际谈判的一个主要议题,各种资助机制已经发展起来,以支持发展中国家的适应(Grasso 2009;Hulme et al. 2011;Petherick 2012;Schipper and Burton 2009)。发达国家的国家政府也开始了关于适应的战略思考,以英国的《气候变化法案》(英国文具办公室2008年)、欧盟的《适应战略》(欧盟2013年)和澳大利亚的《国家气候恢复和适应战略》(澳大利亚联邦2015年)为代表。这种自上而下的适应方法得到了以地方/市政和州/地区适应规划为代表的广泛的自下而上的努力的补充(Lindseth 2005;Measham et al. 2011;Preston and Kay 2010;Saavedra and Budd 2009)。鉴于这些事态发展,人们可能会认为,适应政策和实践正在取得实质性进展,而且,其中一些进展可归功于适应学术研究的能力,它有助于支持适应决策,同时也揭示了适应过程的复杂性。然而,本《气候变化适应政策研究手册》并没有从表面上接受这些假设,而是努力通过批判性的视角来看待它们。这
Introduction: understanding adaptation in the context of social theory
The past two decades have witnessed significant evolution of the adaptation research enterprise (Preston et al. 2013; Preston et al. 2015). This is evidenced by the expanded treatment of adaptation in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (IPCC 2014), a development that was enabled by rapid growth in the volume of adaptation literature following the Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC 2009). A similar expansion of adaptation has also been witnessed in adaptation policy and practice. Although once viewed as a taboo topic (Pielke Jr 1998; Pielke et al. 2007), adaptation is now being institutionalized at a range of geopolitical scales. Adaptation, and particularly adaptation finance, is a major subject of debate within international negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and various funding mechanisms have been developed to support adaptation in developing nations (Grasso 2009; Hulme et al. 2011; Petherick 2012; Schipper and Burton 2009). National governments of developed nations have also initiated strategic thinking regarding adaptation as represented by the United Kingdom’s Climate Change Act (UK Stationery Office 2008) the European Union’s Adaptation Strategy (EU 2013) and Australia’s National Climate Resilience and Adaptation Strategy (Commonwealth of Australia 2015). Such top-down approaches to adaptation are complemented by a broad range of bottom-up efforts represented by local/municipal, and state/district adaptation planning (Lindseth 2005; Measham et al. 2011; Preston and Kay 2010; Saavedra and Budd 2009). Given these developments, one might assume that substantive progress is being made in adaptation policy and practice and, moreover, that some of that progress can be attributed to the ability of adaptation scholarship to help support adaptation decision-making while also shedding light on the complexities of adaptation processes. Yet, rather than accept these assumptions at face value, this Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Policy endeavors to view them through a critical lens. To that