{"title":"重症监护病房重症流感和COVID-19患者曲霉病和其他机会性真菌感染的负担是什么?","authors":"J. Menendez Lorenzo, D. Dhasmana","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundCo-infection with Aspergillus previously described to cause significant morbidity and mortality in those with severe Influenza, has more recently been described in COVID-19. ‘Influenza-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis’ (IAPA) and ‘COVID-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis’ (CAPA) have been reported in up to 23% and 35% of severe disease, respectively. Establishing evidence of invasive Aspergillosis (IA) in these patients is challenging, requiring specific clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria. The burden of IAPA and CAPA in the ICU in our region is unknown.AimsTo identify the incidence of invasive Aspergillosis (IA) and other opportunistic fungal infection in those with severe Influenza and COVID-19 in a district general hospital, Fife, Scotland.MethodsRetrospective cohort review of ICU admissions with severe Influenza or COVID-19 from May 2017 - February 2021. IA was diagnosed using international definitions according to EORTC/MSG, AspICU and modified AspICU criteria.Results89 patients were identified with Influenza (27;median age 53.3 yrs, male 56%) and COVID-19 (62;median age 59.1 yrs, male 61%). No case satisfied criteria for definite IA, however, the majority of patients did not undergo all relevant tests;CT imaging features in 26/89 (29.2%), and fungal biomarkers in 3/89 (3.4%). Two patients demonstrated Aspergillus culture from respiratory samples but did not meet other criteria. Fungal infections were identified in 39/89 (44%), the majority Candida (37), mostly from ET secretions (54%). Candida was significantly higher in COVID-19 than in Influenza, including 2 patients with Candidaemia. Positive fungal culture was associated with increased length of stay (43d vs 20d), ICU bed days (26d vs 19d), but not mortality (33.3% vs 30.0%). Few patients (7.9%) received antifungal treatment, with possible explanations including unclear diagnosis, high costs, uncertain benefit. 54/89 (60.7%) demonstrated bacterial co-infection, including 31/89 (34.8%) with bacteraemia (COVID, 23;Influenza, 8).ConclusionsIAPA and CAPA were not identified in this 4-year cohort, although case finding was limited by inadequate diagnostics. Timely access to fungal biomarkers compromises diagnostic testing. The incidence is likely to be low, despite the significant study limitations. We recommend prospective systematic practice of investigations and improved fungal diagnostics to better understand the burden of Aspergillosis in these patients.","PeriodicalId":266318,"journal":{"name":"COVID-19: clinical features and risk","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P92 What is the burden of aspergillosis and other opportunistic fungal infections in patients with severe influenza and COVID-19 in the ICU?\",\"authors\":\"J. Menendez Lorenzo, D. Dhasmana\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundCo-infection with Aspergillus previously described to cause significant morbidity and mortality in those with severe Influenza, has more recently been described in COVID-19. ‘Influenza-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis’ (IAPA) and ‘COVID-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis’ (CAPA) have been reported in up to 23% and 35% of severe disease, respectively. Establishing evidence of invasive Aspergillosis (IA) in these patients is challenging, requiring specific clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria. The burden of IAPA and CAPA in the ICU in our region is unknown.AimsTo identify the incidence of invasive Aspergillosis (IA) and other opportunistic fungal infection in those with severe Influenza and COVID-19 in a district general hospital, Fife, Scotland.MethodsRetrospective cohort review of ICU admissions with severe Influenza or COVID-19 from May 2017 - February 2021. IA was diagnosed using international definitions according to EORTC/MSG, AspICU and modified AspICU criteria.Results89 patients were identified with Influenza (27;median age 53.3 yrs, male 56%) and COVID-19 (62;median age 59.1 yrs, male 61%). No case satisfied criteria for definite IA, however, the majority of patients did not undergo all relevant tests;CT imaging features in 26/89 (29.2%), and fungal biomarkers in 3/89 (3.4%). Two patients demonstrated Aspergillus culture from respiratory samples but did not meet other criteria. Fungal infections were identified in 39/89 (44%), the majority Candida (37), mostly from ET secretions (54%). Candida was significantly higher in COVID-19 than in Influenza, including 2 patients with Candidaemia. Positive fungal culture was associated with increased length of stay (43d vs 20d), ICU bed days (26d vs 19d), but not mortality (33.3% vs 30.0%). Few patients (7.9%) received antifungal treatment, with possible explanations including unclear diagnosis, high costs, uncertain benefit. 54/89 (60.7%) demonstrated bacterial co-infection, including 31/89 (34.8%) with bacteraemia (COVID, 23;Influenza, 8).ConclusionsIAPA and CAPA were not identified in this 4-year cohort, although case finding was limited by inadequate diagnostics. Timely access to fungal biomarkers compromises diagnostic testing. The incidence is likely to be low, despite the significant study limitations. We recommend prospective systematic practice of investigations and improved fungal diagnostics to better understand the burden of Aspergillosis in these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":266318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COVID-19: clinical features and risk\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COVID-19: clinical features and risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COVID-19: clinical features and risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:以前曾报道过在严重流感患者中引起严重发病率和死亡率的曲霉合并感染,最近在COVID-19中也有报道。据报告,“流感相关肺曲霉病”(IAPA)和“covid - 19相关肺曲霉病”(CAPA)分别占严重疾病的23%和35%。在这些患者中建立侵袭性曲霉病(IA)的证据是具有挑战性的,需要特定的临床、放射学和微生物学标准。本地区ICU的IAPA和CAPA负担尚不清楚。目的了解苏格兰法夫郡某地区综合医院重症流感合并COVID-19患者侵袭性曲霉病(invasive Aspergillosis, IA)及其他机会性真菌感染的发生率。方法回顾性队列分析2017年5月至2021年2月ICU收治的重症流感或COVID-19患者。根据EORTC/MSG、AspICU和修改后的AspICU标准,使用国际定义诊断IA。结果89例确诊为流感(27例,中位年龄53.3岁,男性56%)和COVID-19(62例,中位年龄59.1岁,男性61%)。没有病例符合明确的IA标准,然而,大多数患者没有接受所有相关检查;CT影像学特征为26/89(29.2%),真菌生物标志物为3/89(3.4%)。两名患者从呼吸样本中培养出曲霉,但不符合其他标准。真菌感染39/89(44%),假丝酵母感染37(37),主要来自ET分泌物(54%)。2019冠状病毒病患者中念珠菌明显高于流感患者,其中2例为念珠菌血症。真菌培养阳性与住院时间(43d vs 20d)、ICU住院天数(26d vs 19d)增加相关,但与死亡率无关(33.3% vs 30.0%)。少数患者(7.9%)接受了抗真菌治疗,可能的解释包括诊断不清、费用高、疗效不确定。54/89例(60.7%)表现为细菌共感染,其中31/89例(34.8%)合并菌血症(COVID, 23;Influenza, 8)。结论在这4年队列中未发现siapa和CAPA,尽管诊断不充分限制了病例发现。及时获得真菌生物标志物会影响诊断测试。尽管研究有很大的局限性,但发病率可能很低。我们建议前瞻性的系统调查实践和改进真菌诊断,以更好地了解曲霉病在这些患者中的负担。
P92 What is the burden of aspergillosis and other opportunistic fungal infections in patients with severe influenza and COVID-19 in the ICU?
BackgroundCo-infection with Aspergillus previously described to cause significant morbidity and mortality in those with severe Influenza, has more recently been described in COVID-19. ‘Influenza-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis’ (IAPA) and ‘COVID-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis’ (CAPA) have been reported in up to 23% and 35% of severe disease, respectively. Establishing evidence of invasive Aspergillosis (IA) in these patients is challenging, requiring specific clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria. The burden of IAPA and CAPA in the ICU in our region is unknown.AimsTo identify the incidence of invasive Aspergillosis (IA) and other opportunistic fungal infection in those with severe Influenza and COVID-19 in a district general hospital, Fife, Scotland.MethodsRetrospective cohort review of ICU admissions with severe Influenza or COVID-19 from May 2017 - February 2021. IA was diagnosed using international definitions according to EORTC/MSG, AspICU and modified AspICU criteria.Results89 patients were identified with Influenza (27;median age 53.3 yrs, male 56%) and COVID-19 (62;median age 59.1 yrs, male 61%). No case satisfied criteria for definite IA, however, the majority of patients did not undergo all relevant tests;CT imaging features in 26/89 (29.2%), and fungal biomarkers in 3/89 (3.4%). Two patients demonstrated Aspergillus culture from respiratory samples but did not meet other criteria. Fungal infections were identified in 39/89 (44%), the majority Candida (37), mostly from ET secretions (54%). Candida was significantly higher in COVID-19 than in Influenza, including 2 patients with Candidaemia. Positive fungal culture was associated with increased length of stay (43d vs 20d), ICU bed days (26d vs 19d), but not mortality (33.3% vs 30.0%). Few patients (7.9%) received antifungal treatment, with possible explanations including unclear diagnosis, high costs, uncertain benefit. 54/89 (60.7%) demonstrated bacterial co-infection, including 31/89 (34.8%) with bacteraemia (COVID, 23;Influenza, 8).ConclusionsIAPA and CAPA were not identified in this 4-year cohort, although case finding was limited by inadequate diagnostics. Timely access to fungal biomarkers compromises diagnostic testing. The incidence is likely to be low, despite the significant study limitations. We recommend prospective systematic practice of investigations and improved fungal diagnostics to better understand the burden of Aspergillosis in these patients.