隐私是无聊的部分:物联网中的用户感知和行为

Meredydd Williams, Jason R. C. Nurse, S. Creese
{"title":"隐私是无聊的部分:物联网中的用户感知和行为","authors":"Meredydd Williams, Jason R. C. Nurse, S. Creese","doi":"10.1109/PST.2017.00029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In opinion polls, the public frequently claim to value their privacy. However, individuals often seem to overlook the principle, contributing to a disparity labelled the 'Privacy Paradox'. The growth of the Internet-of-Things (IoT) is frequently claimed to place privacy at risk. However, the Paradox remains underexplored in the IoT. In addressing this, we first conduct an online survey (N = 170) to compare public opinions of IoT and less-novel devices. Although we find users perceive privacy risks, many still decide to purchase smart devices. With the IoT rated less usable/familiar, we assert that it constrains protective behaviour. To explore this hypothesis, we perform contextualised interviews (N = 40) with the public. In these dialogues, owners discuss their opinions and actions with a personal device. We find the Paradox is significantly more prevalent in the IoT, frequently justified by a lack of awareness. We finish by highlighting the qualitative comments of users, and suggesting practical solutions to their issues. This is the first work, to our knowledge, to evaluate the Privacy Paradox over a broad range of technologies.","PeriodicalId":405887,"journal":{"name":"2017 15th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy is the Boring Bit: User Perceptions and Behaviour in the Internet-of-Things\",\"authors\":\"Meredydd Williams, Jason R. C. Nurse, S. Creese\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PST.2017.00029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In opinion polls, the public frequently claim to value their privacy. However, individuals often seem to overlook the principle, contributing to a disparity labelled the 'Privacy Paradox'. The growth of the Internet-of-Things (IoT) is frequently claimed to place privacy at risk. However, the Paradox remains underexplored in the IoT. In addressing this, we first conduct an online survey (N = 170) to compare public opinions of IoT and less-novel devices. Although we find users perceive privacy risks, many still decide to purchase smart devices. With the IoT rated less usable/familiar, we assert that it constrains protective behaviour. To explore this hypothesis, we perform contextualised interviews (N = 40) with the public. In these dialogues, owners discuss their opinions and actions with a personal device. We find the Paradox is significantly more prevalent in the IoT, frequently justified by a lack of awareness. We finish by highlighting the qualitative comments of users, and suggesting practical solutions to their issues. This is the first work, to our knowledge, to evaluate the Privacy Paradox over a broad range of technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 15th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 15th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2017.00029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 15th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2017.00029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

在民意调查中,公众经常声称重视他们的隐私。然而,个人似乎经常忽视这一原则,导致了一种被称为“隐私悖论”的差异。人们经常声称物联网(IoT)的发展将隐私置于危险之中。然而,这一悖论在物联网领域仍未得到充分探索。为了解决这个问题,我们首先进行了一项在线调查(N = 170),以比较公众对物联网和不太新颖的设备的看法。尽管我们发现用户意识到了隐私风险,但许多人仍然决定购买智能设备。由于物联网的可用性/熟悉度较低,我们断言它限制了保护行为。为了探索这一假设,我们对公众进行了情境化访谈(N = 40)。在这些对话中,所有者通过个人设备讨论他们的意见和行动。我们发现这种悖论在物联网中更为普遍,通常是由于缺乏意识。最后,我们强调用户的定性评论,并为他们的问题提出切实可行的解决方案。据我们所知,这是第一个在广泛的技术范围内评估隐私悖论的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Privacy is the Boring Bit: User Perceptions and Behaviour in the Internet-of-Things
In opinion polls, the public frequently claim to value their privacy. However, individuals often seem to overlook the principle, contributing to a disparity labelled the 'Privacy Paradox'. The growth of the Internet-of-Things (IoT) is frequently claimed to place privacy at risk. However, the Paradox remains underexplored in the IoT. In addressing this, we first conduct an online survey (N = 170) to compare public opinions of IoT and less-novel devices. Although we find users perceive privacy risks, many still decide to purchase smart devices. With the IoT rated less usable/familiar, we assert that it constrains protective behaviour. To explore this hypothesis, we perform contextualised interviews (N = 40) with the public. In these dialogues, owners discuss their opinions and actions with a personal device. We find the Paradox is significantly more prevalent in the IoT, frequently justified by a lack of awareness. We finish by highlighting the qualitative comments of users, and suggesting practical solutions to their issues. This is the first work, to our knowledge, to evaluate the Privacy Paradox over a broad range of technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信