战略规划模型的简要比较分析

S. Silvestrov, S. A. Pobyvaev, I. Belyaev, K. Andrianov
{"title":"战略规划模型的简要比较分析","authors":"S. Silvestrov, S. A. Pobyvaev, I. Belyaev, K. Andrianov","doi":"10.2991/icefb-19.2019.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors consider the main existing models of national and supranational strategic planning. Currently, the western and eastern models of strategic planning are most widely used. Within the Western model, American and European stand out. The authors note the advantages and disadvantages of each of the models. In addition, the national models of the USA, France, Germany, Japan and China, as well as the EU and NATO, are briefly characterized. The article provides a brief description of national strategic planning procedures and the role of various government bodies in its process. Differences in countries and models in attracting independent expertise for strategic planning were also noted. According to the observations of the authors, signs of slow convergence of various national and regional strategic planning models are currently observed. Keywords—strategic planning; plan; state planning bodies; strategic planning model; forecast; planning procedure","PeriodicalId":165952,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A brief comparative analysis of strategic planning models\",\"authors\":\"S. Silvestrov, S. A. Pobyvaev, I. Belyaev, K. Andrianov\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/icefb-19.2019.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors consider the main existing models of national and supranational strategic planning. Currently, the western and eastern models of strategic planning are most widely used. Within the Western model, American and European stand out. The authors note the advantages and disadvantages of each of the models. In addition, the national models of the USA, France, Germany, Japan and China, as well as the EU and NATO, are briefly characterized. The article provides a brief description of national strategic planning procedures and the role of various government bodies in its process. Differences in countries and models in attracting independent expertise for strategic planning were also noted. According to the observations of the authors, signs of slow convergence of various national and regional strategic planning models are currently observed. Keywords—strategic planning; plan; state planning bodies; strategic planning model; forecast; planning procedure\",\"PeriodicalId\":165952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019)\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/icefb-19.2019.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icefb-19.2019.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者考察了现有的主要国家和超国家战略规划模式。目前,西方和东方的战略规划模型应用最为广泛。在西方模式中,美国和欧洲的模式尤为突出。作者指出了每种模型的优点和缺点。此外,还简要介绍了美国、法国、德国、日本、中国以及欧盟、北约的国家模式。本文简要介绍了国家战略规划程序和各政府机构在其过程中的作用。还注意到各国在吸引独立专门知识进行战略规划方面的差异和模式。根据作者的观察,目前观察到各种国家和区域战略规划模式缓慢趋同的迹象。Keywords-strategic规划;计划;国家规划机构;战略规划模型;预测;规划过程
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A brief comparative analysis of strategic planning models
The authors consider the main existing models of national and supranational strategic planning. Currently, the western and eastern models of strategic planning are most widely used. Within the Western model, American and European stand out. The authors note the advantages and disadvantages of each of the models. In addition, the national models of the USA, France, Germany, Japan and China, as well as the EU and NATO, are briefly characterized. The article provides a brief description of national strategic planning procedures and the role of various government bodies in its process. Differences in countries and models in attracting independent expertise for strategic planning were also noted. According to the observations of the authors, signs of slow convergence of various national and regional strategic planning models are currently observed. Keywords—strategic planning; plan; state planning bodies; strategic planning model; forecast; planning procedure
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信