S. Silvestrov, S. A. Pobyvaev, I. Belyaev, K. Andrianov
{"title":"战略规划模型的简要比较分析","authors":"S. Silvestrov, S. A. Pobyvaev, I. Belyaev, K. Andrianov","doi":"10.2991/icefb-19.2019.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors consider the main existing models of national and supranational strategic planning. Currently, the western and eastern models of strategic planning are most widely used. Within the Western model, American and European stand out. The authors note the advantages and disadvantages of each of the models. In addition, the national models of the USA, France, Germany, Japan and China, as well as the EU and NATO, are briefly characterized. The article provides a brief description of national strategic planning procedures and the role of various government bodies in its process. Differences in countries and models in attracting independent expertise for strategic planning were also noted. According to the observations of the authors, signs of slow convergence of various national and regional strategic planning models are currently observed. Keywords—strategic planning; plan; state planning bodies; strategic planning model; forecast; planning procedure","PeriodicalId":165952,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A brief comparative analysis of strategic planning models\",\"authors\":\"S. Silvestrov, S. A. Pobyvaev, I. Belyaev, K. Andrianov\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/icefb-19.2019.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors consider the main existing models of national and supranational strategic planning. Currently, the western and eastern models of strategic planning are most widely used. Within the Western model, American and European stand out. The authors note the advantages and disadvantages of each of the models. In addition, the national models of the USA, France, Germany, Japan and China, as well as the EU and NATO, are briefly characterized. The article provides a brief description of national strategic planning procedures and the role of various government bodies in its process. Differences in countries and models in attracting independent expertise for strategic planning were also noted. According to the observations of the authors, signs of slow convergence of various national and regional strategic planning models are currently observed. Keywords—strategic planning; plan; state planning bodies; strategic planning model; forecast; planning procedure\",\"PeriodicalId\":165952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019)\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/icefb-19.2019.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the External Challenges and Risks for Russia in the Context of the World Community’s Transition to Polycentrism: Economics, Finance and Business (ICEFB 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icefb-19.2019.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A brief comparative analysis of strategic planning models
The authors consider the main existing models of national and supranational strategic planning. Currently, the western and eastern models of strategic planning are most widely used. Within the Western model, American and European stand out. The authors note the advantages and disadvantages of each of the models. In addition, the national models of the USA, France, Germany, Japan and China, as well as the EU and NATO, are briefly characterized. The article provides a brief description of national strategic planning procedures and the role of various government bodies in its process. Differences in countries and models in attracting independent expertise for strategic planning were also noted. According to the observations of the authors, signs of slow convergence of various national and regional strategic planning models are currently observed. Keywords—strategic planning; plan; state planning bodies; strategic planning model; forecast; planning procedure