育龄患者子宫切除术后加速康复

O. Proshchenko, I. Ventskivska, Serhii Vasyliuk, A. Mykytiuk
{"title":"育龄患者子宫切除术后加速康复","authors":"O. Proshchenko, I. Ventskivska, Serhii Vasyliuk, A. Mykytiuk","doi":"10.33574/hjog.0526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims. The principles of enhanced recovery in operative gynecology, comorbidity, and a multimodal approach in perioperative support require comprehensive study and optimization, and the ambiguity of literature reports determines the relevance of this study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the parameters of perioperative monitoring after hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma in patients of reproductive age using enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and their impact on quality of life indicators. Materials and methods. To evaluate the effectiveness of the enhanced recovery protocol after hysterectomy, two groups were formed: the main prospective group, which included 46 patients, who underwent vaginal hysterectomy without appendages and 36 patients with abdominal hysterectomy, who used enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. The comparison group (group of standard management) included 44 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy without appendages and 34 patients with abdominal hysterectomy. The main parameters of monitoring were the postoperative pain level, intraoperative blood loss, diuresis rate, the timing of urinary catheter removal and recovery of peristalsis, as well as individual activation of motor activity. Results. When using the principles of ERAS, the quantitative assessment of pain level (“absence of pain”) was 1.6 times more severe compared to the data of the comparison group; the timing of urinary catheter removal was 2.0 times shorter, drain removal – 2.7 times shorter, recovery of peristalsis – 1.9 times shorter and individual activation of motor activity – 2.9 times earlier than in patients of the comparison group. Conclusions. Studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using laparoscopic technology in combination with the ERAS, which demonstrates a fall in the volume of intraoperative blood loss, a decrease in blood and fluid balance, a shortening of the time of invasive intravascular intervention, allows to improve the course of the early postoperative period, relieve postoperative pain syndrome, reduce the risk of intestinal paresis, shorten the rehabilitation period, and, as a result, improve quality of life indicators.","PeriodicalId":194739,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerated rehabilitation after hysterectomy in reproductive age patients\",\"authors\":\"O. Proshchenko, I. Ventskivska, Serhii Vasyliuk, A. Mykytiuk\",\"doi\":\"10.33574/hjog.0526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and aims. The principles of enhanced recovery in operative gynecology, comorbidity, and a multimodal approach in perioperative support require comprehensive study and optimization, and the ambiguity of literature reports determines the relevance of this study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the parameters of perioperative monitoring after hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma in patients of reproductive age using enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and their impact on quality of life indicators. Materials and methods. To evaluate the effectiveness of the enhanced recovery protocol after hysterectomy, two groups were formed: the main prospective group, which included 46 patients, who underwent vaginal hysterectomy without appendages and 36 patients with abdominal hysterectomy, who used enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. The comparison group (group of standard management) included 44 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy without appendages and 34 patients with abdominal hysterectomy. The main parameters of monitoring were the postoperative pain level, intraoperative blood loss, diuresis rate, the timing of urinary catheter removal and recovery of peristalsis, as well as individual activation of motor activity. Results. When using the principles of ERAS, the quantitative assessment of pain level (“absence of pain”) was 1.6 times more severe compared to the data of the comparison group; the timing of urinary catheter removal was 2.0 times shorter, drain removal – 2.7 times shorter, recovery of peristalsis – 1.9 times shorter and individual activation of motor activity – 2.9 times earlier than in patients of the comparison group. Conclusions. Studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using laparoscopic technology in combination with the ERAS, which demonstrates a fall in the volume of intraoperative blood loss, a decrease in blood and fluid balance, a shortening of the time of invasive intravascular intervention, allows to improve the course of the early postoperative period, relieve postoperative pain syndrome, reduce the risk of intestinal paresis, shorten the rehabilitation period, and, as a result, improve quality of life indicators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33574/hjog.0526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33574/hjog.0526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的。手术妇科提高康复的原则、合并症、围手术期支持的多模式方式需要全面研究和优化,文献报道的模糊性决定了本研究的相关性。本研究的目的是评估育龄期子宫平滑肌瘤患者子宫切除术后围手术期监测参数,采用增强术后恢复方案及其对生活质量指标的影响。材料和方法。为了评估子宫切除术后增强恢复方案的有效性,我们分为两组:主要前瞻性组,包括46例接受阴道无附件子宫切除术的患者和36例接受腹部子宫切除术的患者,他们采用手术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案。对照组(标准处理组)包括44例阴道无附件子宫切除术患者和34例腹部子宫切除术患者。监测的主要参数为术后疼痛程度、术中出血量、利尿率、拔除导尿管时间及肠蠕动恢复情况、个体运动活动激活情况。结果。当采用ERAS原则时,疼痛程度(“无疼痛”)的定量评估比对照组严重1.6倍;与对照组患者相比,拔管时间缩短2.0倍,引流时间缩短2.7倍,蠕动恢复时间缩短1.9倍,个体运动活动激活时间提前2.9倍。结论。研究表明,腹腔镜技术与ERAS联合应用的可行性,术中出血量下降,血液平衡下降,血管内介入时间缩短,改善术后早期病程,缓解术后疼痛综合征,降低肠瘫风险,缩短康复期。提高生活质量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accelerated rehabilitation after hysterectomy in reproductive age patients
Background and aims. The principles of enhanced recovery in operative gynecology, comorbidity, and a multimodal approach in perioperative support require comprehensive study and optimization, and the ambiguity of literature reports determines the relevance of this study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the parameters of perioperative monitoring after hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma in patients of reproductive age using enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and their impact on quality of life indicators. Materials and methods. To evaluate the effectiveness of the enhanced recovery protocol after hysterectomy, two groups were formed: the main prospective group, which included 46 patients, who underwent vaginal hysterectomy without appendages and 36 patients with abdominal hysterectomy, who used enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. The comparison group (group of standard management) included 44 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy without appendages and 34 patients with abdominal hysterectomy. The main parameters of monitoring were the postoperative pain level, intraoperative blood loss, diuresis rate, the timing of urinary catheter removal and recovery of peristalsis, as well as individual activation of motor activity. Results. When using the principles of ERAS, the quantitative assessment of pain level (“absence of pain”) was 1.6 times more severe compared to the data of the comparison group; the timing of urinary catheter removal was 2.0 times shorter, drain removal – 2.7 times shorter, recovery of peristalsis – 1.9 times shorter and individual activation of motor activity – 2.9 times earlier than in patients of the comparison group. Conclusions. Studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using laparoscopic technology in combination with the ERAS, which demonstrates a fall in the volume of intraoperative blood loss, a decrease in blood and fluid balance, a shortening of the time of invasive intravascular intervention, allows to improve the course of the early postoperative period, relieve postoperative pain syndrome, reduce the risk of intestinal paresis, shorten the rehabilitation period, and, as a result, improve quality of life indicators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信