人体工程学设计

F. Tosi
{"title":"人体工程学设计","authors":"F. Tosi","doi":"10.1201/b10529-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many points of contact—and today of integration—between the theoretical and methodological approach of Design and the approach of ergonomics and, in particular, the Human-Centred Design/User Experience. First, the centrality of the user—or rather the centrality of the person—in the process of designing and developing the product or system, is the main point of contact both from an ethical point of view, starting from the same definitions of Ergonomics and Design, which from a methodological and operational point of view. Design and ergonomics also operate more on the level of problem solving than in abstract theoretical research, characterizing itself mainly on the basis of the field of intervention rather than that of the disciplinary area as such. And it is in fact the ability to design innovation, and the methods of intervention aimed at synthesizing innovative design solutions, the specific contributions that Design offers to ergonomics and its multidisciplinary plant. It is precisely in this framework that today we witness the progressive approach, and often the overlap between the Human-Centred Design approaches and those proper to the areas Of Design Driven innovation and design thinking. In particular, the synthesis of usability and user experience assessment methods, which are unique to the Human-Centred ergonomic approach and the Design driven innovation and Design Thinking approach, are now one of the areas of research and research current intervention that can offer innovative solutions both in the processes of training and implementation of products and services, and in the processes of social innovation.","PeriodicalId":196629,"journal":{"name":"Springer Series in Design and Innovation","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design for Ergonomics\",\"authors\":\"F. Tosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/b10529-72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are many points of contact—and today of integration—between the theoretical and methodological approach of Design and the approach of ergonomics and, in particular, the Human-Centred Design/User Experience. First, the centrality of the user—or rather the centrality of the person—in the process of designing and developing the product or system, is the main point of contact both from an ethical point of view, starting from the same definitions of Ergonomics and Design, which from a methodological and operational point of view. Design and ergonomics also operate more on the level of problem solving than in abstract theoretical research, characterizing itself mainly on the basis of the field of intervention rather than that of the disciplinary area as such. And it is in fact the ability to design innovation, and the methods of intervention aimed at synthesizing innovative design solutions, the specific contributions that Design offers to ergonomics and its multidisciplinary plant. It is precisely in this framework that today we witness the progressive approach, and often the overlap between the Human-Centred Design approaches and those proper to the areas Of Design Driven innovation and design thinking. In particular, the synthesis of usability and user experience assessment methods, which are unique to the Human-Centred ergonomic approach and the Design driven innovation and Design Thinking approach, are now one of the areas of research and research current intervention that can offer innovative solutions both in the processes of training and implementation of products and services, and in the processes of social innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Springer Series in Design and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Springer Series in Design and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/b10529-72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Springer Series in Design and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/b10529-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

在设计的理论和方法论方法与人体工程学方法之间,特别是以人为本的设计/用户体验之间,有许多接触点——今天的整合点。首先,在设计和开发产品或系统的过程中,用户的中心地位——或者更确切地说,人的中心地位——是从伦理的角度出发的主要接触点,从人类工程学和设计的相同定义出发,从方法论和操作的角度出发。设计和人体工程学更多的是在解决问题的层面上运作,而不是抽象的理论研究,其特点主要是基于干预领域,而不是学科领域本身。事实上,它是设计创新的能力,以及旨在综合创新设计解决方案的干预方法,设计为人体工程学及其多学科工厂提供的具体贡献。正是在这个框架中,我们今天看到了进步的方法,并且经常在以人为本的设计方法与那些适合设计驱动创新和设计思维领域的方法之间重叠。特别是,可用性和用户体验评估方法的综合,这是独特的以人为本的人体工程学方法和设计驱动的创新和设计思维方法,现在是研究和研究当前干预的领域之一,可以在培训和实施产品和服务的过程中,以及在社会创新的过程中提供创新的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design for Ergonomics
There are many points of contact—and today of integration—between the theoretical and methodological approach of Design and the approach of ergonomics and, in particular, the Human-Centred Design/User Experience. First, the centrality of the user—or rather the centrality of the person—in the process of designing and developing the product or system, is the main point of contact both from an ethical point of view, starting from the same definitions of Ergonomics and Design, which from a methodological and operational point of view. Design and ergonomics also operate more on the level of problem solving than in abstract theoretical research, characterizing itself mainly on the basis of the field of intervention rather than that of the disciplinary area as such. And it is in fact the ability to design innovation, and the methods of intervention aimed at synthesizing innovative design solutions, the specific contributions that Design offers to ergonomics and its multidisciplinary plant. It is precisely in this framework that today we witness the progressive approach, and often the overlap between the Human-Centred Design approaches and those proper to the areas Of Design Driven innovation and design thinking. In particular, the synthesis of usability and user experience assessment methods, which are unique to the Human-Centred ergonomic approach and the Design driven innovation and Design Thinking approach, are now one of the areas of research and research current intervention that can offer innovative solutions both in the processes of training and implementation of products and services, and in the processes of social innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信