高贵的骑士

D. Crouch
{"title":"高贵的骑士","authors":"D. Crouch","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198782940.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The knight was included within the origin myth of Nobility by 1210, which was an elevation that depended on defining knights by the hypermoral expectations of their Nobility of Mind. The knight had moral expectations laid on him already in the early twelfth century, but by the end of the century these were intensifying to include the same moral expectations laid on anyone claiming to be noble. This can be traced in the 1180s through the appearance of two grades of knighthood—that of banneret being the nobler, and the rise of the genre of chivalric tract—the origins of both being traceable to the courtly society dominated by Philip of Flanders and the sons of Henry II of England. Simultaneously, literature stigmatized mercenary knights and bourgeois knights as beyond the bounds of noble knighthood. The sacralization of the sword the knight bore was another tactic to raise the order.","PeriodicalId":249299,"journal":{"name":"The Chivalric Turn","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Noble Knight\",\"authors\":\"D. Crouch\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198782940.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The knight was included within the origin myth of Nobility by 1210, which was an elevation that depended on defining knights by the hypermoral expectations of their Nobility of Mind. The knight had moral expectations laid on him already in the early twelfth century, but by the end of the century these were intensifying to include the same moral expectations laid on anyone claiming to be noble. This can be traced in the 1180s through the appearance of two grades of knighthood—that of banneret being the nobler, and the rise of the genre of chivalric tract—the origins of both being traceable to the courtly society dominated by Philip of Flanders and the sons of Henry II of England. Simultaneously, literature stigmatized mercenary knights and bourgeois knights as beyond the bounds of noble knighthood. The sacralization of the sword the knight bore was another tactic to raise the order.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Chivalric Turn\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Chivalric Turn\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198782940.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chivalric Turn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198782940.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骑士在1210年被纳入贵族的起源神话中,这是一种高度的提升,取决于他们对精神贵族的超道德期望来定义骑士。骑士的道德期望在12世纪初就已经被赋予了,但到12世纪末,这些期望变得越来越强烈,包括了对任何自称高贵的人的道德期望。这可以追溯到19世纪80年代,通过两个等级的骑士身份的出现——代表贵族的班纳特和骑士文学的兴起——两者的起源都可以追溯到弗兰德斯的菲利普和英格兰亨利二世的儿子们统治的宫廷社会。同时,文学对雇佣兵骑士和资产阶级骑士进行了污名化,认为他们超出了贵族骑士的范畴。骑士佩剑的神圣化是提升骑士团地位的另一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Noble Knight
The knight was included within the origin myth of Nobility by 1210, which was an elevation that depended on defining knights by the hypermoral expectations of their Nobility of Mind. The knight had moral expectations laid on him already in the early twelfth century, but by the end of the century these were intensifying to include the same moral expectations laid on anyone claiming to be noble. This can be traced in the 1180s through the appearance of two grades of knighthood—that of banneret being the nobler, and the rise of the genre of chivalric tract—the origins of both being traceable to the courtly society dominated by Philip of Flanders and the sons of Henry II of England. Simultaneously, literature stigmatized mercenary knights and bourgeois knights as beyond the bounds of noble knighthood. The sacralization of the sword the knight bore was another tactic to raise the order.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信