基于自然语言处理的本体自动生成:基于Prolog的方法与基于Bluemix Watson服务的云方法的比较

B. D. Martino, A. Esposito, Salvatore D'Angelo, Alessandro Marrazzo, Angelo Capasso
{"title":"基于自然语言处理的本体自动生成:基于Prolog的方法与基于Bluemix Watson服务的云方法的比较","authors":"B. D. Martino, A. Esposito, Salvatore D'Angelo, Alessandro Marrazzo, Angelo Capasso","doi":"10.1109/CISIS.2016.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, most of the information available on the web is in Natural Language. Extracting such knowledge from Natural Language text is an essential work and a very remarkable research topic in the Semantic Web field. The logic programming language Prolog, based on the definite-clause formalism, is a useful tool for implementing a Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems. However, web-based services for NLP have also been developed recently, and they represent an important alternative to be considered. In this paper we present the comparison between two different approaches in NLP, for the automatic creation of an OWL ontology supporting the semantic annotation of text. The first one is a pure Prolog approach, based on grammar and logic analysis rules. The second one is based on Watson Relationship Extraction service of IBM Cloud platform Bluemix. We evaluate the two approaches in terms of performance, the quality of NLP result, OWL completeness and richness.","PeriodicalId":249236,"journal":{"name":"2016 10th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic Production of an Ontology with NLP: Comparison between a Prolog Based Approach and a Cloud Approach Based on Bluemix Watson Service\",\"authors\":\"B. D. Martino, A. Esposito, Salvatore D'Angelo, Alessandro Marrazzo, Angelo Capasso\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CISIS.2016.98\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, most of the information available on the web is in Natural Language. Extracting such knowledge from Natural Language text is an essential work and a very remarkable research topic in the Semantic Web field. The logic programming language Prolog, based on the definite-clause formalism, is a useful tool for implementing a Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems. However, web-based services for NLP have also been developed recently, and they represent an important alternative to be considered. In this paper we present the comparison between two different approaches in NLP, for the automatic creation of an OWL ontology supporting the semantic annotation of text. The first one is a pure Prolog approach, based on grammar and logic analysis rules. The second one is based on Watson Relationship Extraction service of IBM Cloud platform Bluemix. We evaluate the two approaches in terms of performance, the quality of NLP result, OWL completeness and richness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 10th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 10th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2016.98\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 10th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2016.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

如今,网络上大多数可用的信息都是用自然语言编写的。从自然语言文本中提取这些知识是语义网领域的一项重要工作,也是一个非常引人注目的研究课题。基于定句形式的逻辑程序设计语言Prolog是实现自然语言处理(NLP)系统的一个有用工具。然而,基于网络的NLP服务最近也得到了发展,它们代表了一个值得考虑的重要选择。在本文中,我们比较了两种不同的NLP方法,用于自动创建支持文本语义注释的OWL本体。第一种是基于语法和逻辑分析规则的纯Prolog方法。第二种是基于IBM云平台Bluemix的沃森关系抽取服务。我们从性能、NLP结果质量、OWL完备性和丰富度等方面对这两种方法进行了评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automatic Production of an Ontology with NLP: Comparison between a Prolog Based Approach and a Cloud Approach Based on Bluemix Watson Service
Nowadays, most of the information available on the web is in Natural Language. Extracting such knowledge from Natural Language text is an essential work and a very remarkable research topic in the Semantic Web field. The logic programming language Prolog, based on the definite-clause formalism, is a useful tool for implementing a Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems. However, web-based services for NLP have also been developed recently, and they represent an important alternative to be considered. In this paper we present the comparison between two different approaches in NLP, for the automatic creation of an OWL ontology supporting the semantic annotation of text. The first one is a pure Prolog approach, based on grammar and logic analysis rules. The second one is based on Watson Relationship Extraction service of IBM Cloud platform Bluemix. We evaluate the two approaches in terms of performance, the quality of NLP result, OWL completeness and richness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信