{"title":"从前景到现场服务寿命——从海底EPC承包商的角度看井安装/修井的作用和影响","authors":"L. Bay","doi":"10.4043/29492-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Being a global Subsea and Topside EPC contractor is often synonym with having an extensive portfolio of subsea production system solutions, sometimes including installation and well intervention systems such as landing string systems, riser based intervention systems and riser less intervention systems. However, unlike companies who focus specifically on subsea well intervention, and typically targets life of field opportunities, these EPC contractors might have this technology is in-house which enables cross discipline discussions already during concept studies and Front End Engineering Design studies (FEEDs). This enables contractor and client to select suitable technology not only based on equipment functionality and hardware cost, but highlights the operational impact such selections have both regarding installation of the equipment, and well intervention service throughout the lifetime of the field.\n In a reference project a global EPC company is the main contractor for the engineering, procurement, construction and installation of the Subsea Production System (SPS) equipment in projects related to two large field developments West of Africa for a major operator. A total of 92 vertical subsea x-mas trees (VXTs) was awarded between 2013-2014 designed to be installed in depths down to approximately 2000m. In this case it was decided to install the tubing hangers using simplified landing string technology, while a riser based light intervention system was selected to provide flexible options for VXT installation, well clean-up/ flow back and life of field well intervention. A cross-vendor workover control system was selected to be used in both installation and intervention modes, allowing the operator to perform well interventions on existing subsea infrastructure in the region with 3rd party XT vendors, in addition to the planned field developments.\n This paper will discuss how an EPC contractor can exploit the benefits of being both a subsea EPC contractor and an installation and well intervention service provider. The referenced project will be used as a case study, starting with the early phase studies, to show how decisions related to installation and intervention systems can greatly impact the XT selection and life of field strategy, and hence the configuration of the overall SPS and corresponding tooling. The philosophies around rig related services such as this connects the operator spend on SPS, SURF and drilling scope, and can greatly impact the overall project economics due to synergies across the distinct areas of investment. Furthermore, the paper discusses the importance of having a holistic approach when considering an intervention system for late life management, why it is beneficial to discuss such strategies at an early stage, and the benefits this brings to the end client over time.","PeriodicalId":214691,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Prospect to Life of Field Service – The Role and Impact of Well Installation/ Intervention from a Subsea EPC Contractor's Point of View\",\"authors\":\"L. Bay\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/29492-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Being a global Subsea and Topside EPC contractor is often synonym with having an extensive portfolio of subsea production system solutions, sometimes including installation and well intervention systems such as landing string systems, riser based intervention systems and riser less intervention systems. However, unlike companies who focus specifically on subsea well intervention, and typically targets life of field opportunities, these EPC contractors might have this technology is in-house which enables cross discipline discussions already during concept studies and Front End Engineering Design studies (FEEDs). This enables contractor and client to select suitable technology not only based on equipment functionality and hardware cost, but highlights the operational impact such selections have both regarding installation of the equipment, and well intervention service throughout the lifetime of the field.\\n In a reference project a global EPC company is the main contractor for the engineering, procurement, construction and installation of the Subsea Production System (SPS) equipment in projects related to two large field developments West of Africa for a major operator. A total of 92 vertical subsea x-mas trees (VXTs) was awarded between 2013-2014 designed to be installed in depths down to approximately 2000m. In this case it was decided to install the tubing hangers using simplified landing string technology, while a riser based light intervention system was selected to provide flexible options for VXT installation, well clean-up/ flow back and life of field well intervention. A cross-vendor workover control system was selected to be used in both installation and intervention modes, allowing the operator to perform well interventions on existing subsea infrastructure in the region with 3rd party XT vendors, in addition to the planned field developments.\\n This paper will discuss how an EPC contractor can exploit the benefits of being both a subsea EPC contractor and an installation and well intervention service provider. The referenced project will be used as a case study, starting with the early phase studies, to show how decisions related to installation and intervention systems can greatly impact the XT selection and life of field strategy, and hence the configuration of the overall SPS and corresponding tooling. The philosophies around rig related services such as this connects the operator spend on SPS, SURF and drilling scope, and can greatly impact the overall project economics due to synergies across the distinct areas of investment. Furthermore, the paper discusses the importance of having a holistic approach when considering an intervention system for late life management, why it is beneficial to discuss such strategies at an early stage, and the benefits this brings to the end client over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/29492-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29492-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作为一家全球性的Subsea and Topside EPC承包商,通常意味着拥有广泛的海底生产系统解决方案组合,有时包括安装和油井干预系统,如着陆管柱系统、基于立管的干预系统和无立管的干预系统。然而,与那些专注于海底油井干预的公司不同,这些EPC承包商可能在内部拥有这项技术,可以在概念研究和前端工程设计研究(FEEDs)期间进行跨学科讨论。这使得承包商和客户不仅可以根据设备的功能和硬件成本来选择合适的技术,还可以突出这些选择对设备安装和油井干预服务在整个油田生命周期中的操作影响。在一个参考项目中,一家全球EPC公司是非洲西部两个大型油田开发项目中海底生产系统(SPS)设备的设计、采购、施工和安装的主要承包商。2013年至2014年期间,共获得了92台水下垂直x-mas采油树(vxt),设计安装深度约为2000m。在这种情况下,决定使用简化的着陆管柱技术安装油管悬挂器,同时选择基于立管的轻型干预系统,为VXT的安装、油井清理/返流以及现场油井干预寿命提供灵活的选择。选择了一个跨供应商修井控制系统,用于安装和修井模式,允许运营商在计划的油田开发之外,与第三方XT供应商一起对该地区现有的海底基础设施进行修井。本文将讨论EPC承包商如何利用海底EPC承包商以及安装和修井服务提供商的优势。参考项目将作为一个案例研究,从早期阶段的研究开始,展示与安装和修井系统相关的决策如何极大地影响XT的选择和油田策略的寿命,从而影响整个SPS和相应工具的配置。围绕钻机相关服务的理念将运营商在SPS、SURF和钻井范围上的支出联系起来,并且由于不同投资领域的协同效应,可以极大地影响整个项目的经济效益。此外,本文还讨论了在考虑晚年管理干预系统时采用整体方法的重要性,为什么在早期阶段讨论此类策略是有益的,以及随着时间的推移,这给最终客户带来的好处。
From Prospect to Life of Field Service – The Role and Impact of Well Installation/ Intervention from a Subsea EPC Contractor's Point of View
Being a global Subsea and Topside EPC contractor is often synonym with having an extensive portfolio of subsea production system solutions, sometimes including installation and well intervention systems such as landing string systems, riser based intervention systems and riser less intervention systems. However, unlike companies who focus specifically on subsea well intervention, and typically targets life of field opportunities, these EPC contractors might have this technology is in-house which enables cross discipline discussions already during concept studies and Front End Engineering Design studies (FEEDs). This enables contractor and client to select suitable technology not only based on equipment functionality and hardware cost, but highlights the operational impact such selections have both regarding installation of the equipment, and well intervention service throughout the lifetime of the field.
In a reference project a global EPC company is the main contractor for the engineering, procurement, construction and installation of the Subsea Production System (SPS) equipment in projects related to two large field developments West of Africa for a major operator. A total of 92 vertical subsea x-mas trees (VXTs) was awarded between 2013-2014 designed to be installed in depths down to approximately 2000m. In this case it was decided to install the tubing hangers using simplified landing string technology, while a riser based light intervention system was selected to provide flexible options for VXT installation, well clean-up/ flow back and life of field well intervention. A cross-vendor workover control system was selected to be used in both installation and intervention modes, allowing the operator to perform well interventions on existing subsea infrastructure in the region with 3rd party XT vendors, in addition to the planned field developments.
This paper will discuss how an EPC contractor can exploit the benefits of being both a subsea EPC contractor and an installation and well intervention service provider. The referenced project will be used as a case study, starting with the early phase studies, to show how decisions related to installation and intervention systems can greatly impact the XT selection and life of field strategy, and hence the configuration of the overall SPS and corresponding tooling. The philosophies around rig related services such as this connects the operator spend on SPS, SURF and drilling scope, and can greatly impact the overall project economics due to synergies across the distinct areas of investment. Furthermore, the paper discusses the importance of having a holistic approach when considering an intervention system for late life management, why it is beneficial to discuss such strategies at an early stage, and the benefits this brings to the end client over time.