集油系统非线性模型预测控制的微分工具效率比较

Andrés Codas, M. A. Aguiar, Konstantin Nalum, B. Foss
{"title":"集油系统非线性模型预测控制的微分工具效率比较","authors":"Andrés Codas, M. A. Aguiar, Konstantin Nalum, B. Foss","doi":"10.3182/20130904-3-FR-2041.00069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparison of gradient computation techniques required to solve a single-shooting formulation of nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) problems. An oil production system with network structure is considered as test instance. The structure of the network is exploited to improve computational efficiency. Exact gradient sensitivity calculation methods (forward and adjoint) are compared along with the finite difference approximation. Forward and Reverse automatic differentiation for calculating Jacobians are also compared along with the finite difference approximation counterpart. Since there is a trade off involving accuracy and speed when calculating these gradients, the best combination of tools is case dependent and it is determined by the analyses of performance indexes arising when solving specific NMPC problems. A hybrid approach combining finite difference Jacobian calculations with adjoint sensitivity calculations gave the best performance for our test problems.","PeriodicalId":420241,"journal":{"name":"IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems","volume":"58 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiation Tool Efficiency Comparison for Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Applied to Oil Gathering Systems\",\"authors\":\"Andrés Codas, M. A. Aguiar, Konstantin Nalum, B. Foss\",\"doi\":\"10.3182/20130904-3-FR-2041.00069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparison of gradient computation techniques required to solve a single-shooting formulation of nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) problems. An oil production system with network structure is considered as test instance. The structure of the network is exploited to improve computational efficiency. Exact gradient sensitivity calculation methods (forward and adjoint) are compared along with the finite difference approximation. Forward and Reverse automatic differentiation for calculating Jacobians are also compared along with the finite difference approximation counterpart. Since there is a trade off involving accuracy and speed when calculating these gradients, the best combination of tools is case dependent and it is determined by the analyses of performance indexes arising when solving specific NMPC problems. A hybrid approach combining finite difference Jacobian calculations with adjoint sensitivity calculations gave the best performance for our test problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":420241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems\",\"volume\":\"58 8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3182/20130904-3-FR-2041.00069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3182/20130904-3-FR-2041.00069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文比较了求解非线性模型预测控制(NMPC)问题的单次射击公式所需的梯度计算技术。以具有网络结构的采油系统为试验实例。利用网络的结构来提高计算效率。比较了精确梯度灵敏度计算方法(正演法和伴随法)和有限差分逼近法。还比较了计算雅可比矩阵的正向和反向自动微分以及有限差分近似的对应方法。由于在计算这些梯度时需要权衡准确性和速度,因此工具的最佳组合取决于具体情况,并取决于解决特定NMPC问题时产生的性能指标的分析。结合有限差分雅可比矩阵计算和伴随灵敏度计算的混合方法为我们的测试问题提供了最佳性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differentiation Tool Efficiency Comparison for Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Applied to Oil Gathering Systems
This paper presents a comparison of gradient computation techniques required to solve a single-shooting formulation of nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) problems. An oil production system with network structure is considered as test instance. The structure of the network is exploited to improve computational efficiency. Exact gradient sensitivity calculation methods (forward and adjoint) are compared along with the finite difference approximation. Forward and Reverse automatic differentiation for calculating Jacobians are also compared along with the finite difference approximation counterpart. Since there is a trade off involving accuracy and speed when calculating these gradients, the best combination of tools is case dependent and it is determined by the analyses of performance indexes arising when solving specific NMPC problems. A hybrid approach combining finite difference Jacobian calculations with adjoint sensitivity calculations gave the best performance for our test problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信