Ad-Hoc和传感器网络中路由协议的内在安全性

T. Roosta, S. Pai, Phoebus Chen, S. Sastry, S. Wicker
{"title":"Ad-Hoc和传感器网络中路由协议的内在安全性","authors":"T. Roosta, S. Pai, Phoebus Chen, S. Sastry, S. Wicker","doi":"10.1109/GLOCOM.2007.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many of the routing protocols that have been designed for wireless ad-hoc networks focus on energy-efficiency and guaranteeing high throughput in a non-adversarial setting. However, given that ad-hoc and sensor networks are deployed and left unattended for long periods of time, it is crucial to design secure routing protocols for these networks. Over the past few years, attacks on the routing protocols have been studied and a number of secure routing protocols have been designed for wireless sensor networks. However, there has not been a comprehensive study of how these protocols compare in terms of achieving security goals and maintaining high throughput. In this paper, we focus on the problem of analyzing the inherent security of routing protocols with respect to two categories: multi-path and single-path routing. Within each category, we focus on deterministic vs. probabilistic mechanisms for setting up the routes. We consider the scenario in which an adversary has subverted a subset of the nodes, and as a result, the paths going through these nodes are compromised. We present our findings through simulation results.","PeriodicalId":370937,"journal":{"name":"IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference","volume":"23 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inherent Security of Routing Protocols in Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks\",\"authors\":\"T. Roosta, S. Pai, Phoebus Chen, S. Sastry, S. Wicker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GLOCOM.2007.245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many of the routing protocols that have been designed for wireless ad-hoc networks focus on energy-efficiency and guaranteeing high throughput in a non-adversarial setting. However, given that ad-hoc and sensor networks are deployed and left unattended for long periods of time, it is crucial to design secure routing protocols for these networks. Over the past few years, attacks on the routing protocols have been studied and a number of secure routing protocols have been designed for wireless sensor networks. However, there has not been a comprehensive study of how these protocols compare in terms of achieving security goals and maintaining high throughput. In this paper, we focus on the problem of analyzing the inherent security of routing protocols with respect to two categories: multi-path and single-path routing. Within each category, we focus on deterministic vs. probabilistic mechanisms for setting up the routes. We consider the scenario in which an adversary has subverted a subset of the nodes, and as a result, the paths going through these nodes are compromised. We present our findings through simulation results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference\",\"volume\":\"23 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2007.245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2007.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

许多为无线自组织网络设计的路由协议都关注于能源效率,并保证在非对抗环境下的高吞吐量。然而,考虑到ad-hoc和传感器网络被部署并长时间无人值守,为这些网络设计安全路由协议至关重要。在过去的几年里,人们研究了对路由协议的攻击,并为无线传感器网络设计了许多安全的路由协议。然而,还没有对这些协议在实现安全目标和保持高吞吐量方面的比较进行全面的研究。本文主要从多路径路由和单路径路由两方面分析了路由协议的内在安全性问题。在每个类别中,我们将重点关注设置路由的确定性机制与概率机制。我们考虑这样一个场景:攻击者破坏了节点的一个子集,结果,通过这些节点的路径被破坏了。我们通过模拟结果展示了我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inherent Security of Routing Protocols in Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks
Many of the routing protocols that have been designed for wireless ad-hoc networks focus on energy-efficiency and guaranteeing high throughput in a non-adversarial setting. However, given that ad-hoc and sensor networks are deployed and left unattended for long periods of time, it is crucial to design secure routing protocols for these networks. Over the past few years, attacks on the routing protocols have been studied and a number of secure routing protocols have been designed for wireless sensor networks. However, there has not been a comprehensive study of how these protocols compare in terms of achieving security goals and maintaining high throughput. In this paper, we focus on the problem of analyzing the inherent security of routing protocols with respect to two categories: multi-path and single-path routing. Within each category, we focus on deterministic vs. probabilistic mechanisms for setting up the routes. We consider the scenario in which an adversary has subverted a subset of the nodes, and as a result, the paths going through these nodes are compromised. We present our findings through simulation results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信