基于行为特征区分Web攻击和漏洞扫描

K. Goseva-Popstojanova, Ana Dimitrijevikj
{"title":"基于行为特征区分Web攻击和漏洞扫描","authors":"K. Goseva-Popstojanova, Ana Dimitrijevikj","doi":"10.1109/WAINA.2014.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of vulnerabilities and reported attacks on Web systems are showing increasing trends, which clearly illustrate the need for better understanding of malicious cyber activities. In this paper we use clustering to classify attacker activities aimed at Web systems. The empirical analysis is based on four datasets, each in duration of several months, collected by high-interaction honey pots. The results show that behavioral clustering analysis can be used to distinguish between attack sessions and vulnerability scan sessions. However, the performance heavily depends on the dataset. Furthermore, the results show that attacks differ from vulnerability scans in a small number of features (i.e., session characteristics). Specifically, for each dataset, the best feature selection method (in terms of the high probability of detection and low probability of false alarm) selects only three features and results into three to four clusters, significantly improving the performance of clustering compared to the case when all features are used. The best subset of features and the extent of the improvement, however, also depend on the dataset.","PeriodicalId":424903,"journal":{"name":"2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinguishing between Web Attacks and Vulnerability Scans Based on Behavioral Characteristics\",\"authors\":\"K. Goseva-Popstojanova, Ana Dimitrijevikj\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WAINA.2014.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The number of vulnerabilities and reported attacks on Web systems are showing increasing trends, which clearly illustrate the need for better understanding of malicious cyber activities. In this paper we use clustering to classify attacker activities aimed at Web systems. The empirical analysis is based on four datasets, each in duration of several months, collected by high-interaction honey pots. The results show that behavioral clustering analysis can be used to distinguish between attack sessions and vulnerability scan sessions. However, the performance heavily depends on the dataset. Furthermore, the results show that attacks differ from vulnerability scans in a small number of features (i.e., session characteristics). Specifically, for each dataset, the best feature selection method (in terms of the high probability of detection and low probability of false alarm) selects only three features and results into three to four clusters, significantly improving the performance of clustering compared to the case when all features are used. The best subset of features and the extent of the improvement, however, also depend on the dataset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WAINA.2014.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WAINA.2014.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

针对Web系统的漏洞和已报告的攻击数量呈现出不断增长的趋势,这清楚地说明需要更好地了解恶意网络活动。本文采用聚类方法对针对Web系统的攻击行为进行分类。实证分析基于四个数据集,每个数据集持续几个月,由高交互蜂蜜罐收集。结果表明,行为聚类分析可以用于区分攻击会话和漏洞扫描会话。然而,性能在很大程度上取决于数据集。此外,结果表明,攻击与漏洞扫描在少数特征(即会话特征)上有所不同。具体而言,对于每个数据集,最佳特征选择方法(从高检测概率和低虚警概率的角度来看)只选择三个特征并将结果分成三到四个聚类,与使用所有特征的情况相比,聚类的性能显著提高。然而,特征的最佳子集和改进的程度也取决于数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinguishing between Web Attacks and Vulnerability Scans Based on Behavioral Characteristics
The number of vulnerabilities and reported attacks on Web systems are showing increasing trends, which clearly illustrate the need for better understanding of malicious cyber activities. In this paper we use clustering to classify attacker activities aimed at Web systems. The empirical analysis is based on four datasets, each in duration of several months, collected by high-interaction honey pots. The results show that behavioral clustering analysis can be used to distinguish between attack sessions and vulnerability scan sessions. However, the performance heavily depends on the dataset. Furthermore, the results show that attacks differ from vulnerability scans in a small number of features (i.e., session characteristics). Specifically, for each dataset, the best feature selection method (in terms of the high probability of detection and low probability of false alarm) selects only three features and results into three to four clusters, significantly improving the performance of clustering compared to the case when all features are used. The best subset of features and the extent of the improvement, however, also depend on the dataset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信