日志解析错误分类研究

Issam Sedki, A. Hamou-Lhadj, O. Mohamed, Naser Ezzati-Jivan
{"title":"日志解析错误分类研究","authors":"Issam Sedki, A. Hamou-Lhadj, O. Mohamed, Naser Ezzati-Jivan","doi":"10.1109/ICPC58990.2023.00023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Log parsing is used to extract structures from unstructured log data. It is a key enabler for many software engineering tasks including debugging, fault diagnosis, and anomaly detection. In recent years, we have seen an increase in the number of log parsing techniques and tools. The accuracy of these tools varies significantly. To improve log parsing tools, we need to understand the type of parsing errors they make, which is the purpose of this early research track paper. We achieve this by examining errors of four leading log parsing tools when applied to the parsing of four log datasets generated from various systems. Based on this analysis, we suggest a preliminary classification of log parsing errors, which contains nine categories of errors. We believe that this classification is a good starting point for improving the accuracy of log parsing tools, and also defining better logging practices.","PeriodicalId":376593,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","volume":"529 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Classification of Log Parsing Errors\",\"authors\":\"Issam Sedki, A. Hamou-Lhadj, O. Mohamed, Naser Ezzati-Jivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPC58990.2023.00023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Log parsing is used to extract structures from unstructured log data. It is a key enabler for many software engineering tasks including debugging, fault diagnosis, and anomaly detection. In recent years, we have seen an increase in the number of log parsing techniques and tools. The accuracy of these tools varies significantly. To improve log parsing tools, we need to understand the type of parsing errors they make, which is the purpose of this early research track paper. We achieve this by examining errors of four leading log parsing tools when applied to the parsing of four log datasets generated from various systems. Based on this analysis, we suggest a preliminary classification of log parsing errors, which contains nine categories of errors. We believe that this classification is a good starting point for improving the accuracy of log parsing tools, and also defining better logging practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)\",\"volume\":\"529 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC58990.2023.00023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC58990.2023.00023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

日志解析用于从非结构化日志数据中提取结构。它是许多软件工程任务的关键推动者,包括调试、故障诊断和异常检测。近年来,我们看到日志解析技术和工具的数量有所增加。这些工具的准确性差别很大。为了改进日志解析工具,我们需要了解它们所产生的解析错误的类型,这也是本文早期研究跟踪论文的目的。我们通过检查四种主要日志分析工具在分析从不同系统生成的四个日志数据集时的错误来实现这一点。在此基础上,我们提出了日志解析错误的初步分类,其中包含9类错误。我们相信这种分类对于提高日志解析工具的准确性和定义更好的日志记录实践是一个很好的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a Classification of Log Parsing Errors
Log parsing is used to extract structures from unstructured log data. It is a key enabler for many software engineering tasks including debugging, fault diagnosis, and anomaly detection. In recent years, we have seen an increase in the number of log parsing techniques and tools. The accuracy of these tools varies significantly. To improve log parsing tools, we need to understand the type of parsing errors they make, which is the purpose of this early research track paper. We achieve this by examining errors of four leading log parsing tools when applied to the parsing of four log datasets generated from various systems. Based on this analysis, we suggest a preliminary classification of log parsing errors, which contains nine categories of errors. We believe that this classification is a good starting point for improving the accuracy of log parsing tools, and also defining better logging practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信