软件工程中反对交叉设计的案例

B. Kitchenham, J. Fry, S. Linkman
{"title":"软件工程中反对交叉设计的案例","authors":"B. Kitchenham, J. Fry, S. Linkman","doi":"10.1109/STEP.2003.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are often encouraged to follow experimental procedures in undertaking software engineering studies, however we should not do so blindly as often assumptions are made as part of that process that software engineering methods artefacts and processes breach. One such example is the use of crossover designs. We consider the case where there are period by treatment interactions, (i.e where the treatments are non-commutative) and demonstrate the hazards in using a cross-over design in these cases.","PeriodicalId":260047,"journal":{"name":"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The case against cross-over designs in software engineering\",\"authors\":\"B. Kitchenham, J. Fry, S. Linkman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STEP.2003.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are often encouraged to follow experimental procedures in undertaking software engineering studies, however we should not do so blindly as often assumptions are made as part of that process that software engineering methods artefacts and processes breach. One such example is the use of crossover designs. We consider the case where there are period by treatment interactions, (i.e where the treatments are non-commutative) and demonstrate the hazards in using a cross-over design in these cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":260047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.2003.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.2003.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

我们经常被鼓励在进行软件工程研究时遵循实验过程,但是我们不应该盲目地这样做,因为通常假设是作为软件工程方法工件和过程所违背的过程的一部分。其中一个例子就是交叉设计的使用。我们考虑了治疗相互作用期间的情况(即治疗是非交换的情况),并展示了在这些情况下使用交叉设计的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The case against cross-over designs in software engineering
We are often encouraged to follow experimental procedures in undertaking software engineering studies, however we should not do so blindly as often assumptions are made as part of that process that software engineering methods artefacts and processes breach. One such example is the use of crossover designs. We consider the case where there are period by treatment interactions, (i.e where the treatments are non-commutative) and demonstrate the hazards in using a cross-over design in these cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信