LivDet虹膜2017 -虹膜活性检测大赛2017

David Yambay, Benedict Becker, Naman Kohli, Daksha Yadav, A. Czajka, K. Bowyer, S. Schuckers, Richa Singh, Mayank Vatsa, A. Noore, Diego Gragnaniello, Carlo Sansone, L. Verdoliva, Lingxiao He, Yiwei Ru, Haiqing Li, Nianfeng Liu, Zhenan Sun, T. Tan
{"title":"LivDet虹膜2017 -虹膜活性检测大赛2017","authors":"David Yambay, Benedict Becker, Naman Kohli, Daksha Yadav, A. Czajka, K. Bowyer, S. Schuckers, Richa Singh, Mayank Vatsa, A. Noore, Diego Gragnaniello, Carlo Sansone, L. Verdoliva, Lingxiao He, Yiwei Ru, Haiqing Li, Nianfeng Liu, Zhenan Sun, T. Tan","doi":"10.1109/BTAS.2017.8272763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presentation attacks such as using a contact lens with a printed pattern or printouts of an iris can be utilized to bypass a biometric security system. The first international iris liveness competition was launched in 2013 in order to assess the performance of presentation attack detection (PAD) algorithms, with a second competition in 2015. This paper presents results of the third competition, LivDet-Iris 2017. Three software-based approaches to Presentation Attack Detection were submitted. Four datasets of live and spoof images were tested with an additional cross-sensor test. New datasets and novel situations of data have resulted in this competition being of a higher difficulty than previous competitions. Anonymous received the best results with a rate of rejected live samples of 3.36% and rate of accepted spoof samples of 14.71%. The results show that even with advances, printed iris attacks as well as patterned contacts lenses are still difficult for software-based systems to detect. Printed iris images were easier to be differentiated from live images in comparison to patterned contact lenses as was also seen in previous competitions.","PeriodicalId":372008,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"80","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LivDet iris 2017 — Iris liveness detection competition 2017\",\"authors\":\"David Yambay, Benedict Becker, Naman Kohli, Daksha Yadav, A. Czajka, K. Bowyer, S. Schuckers, Richa Singh, Mayank Vatsa, A. Noore, Diego Gragnaniello, Carlo Sansone, L. Verdoliva, Lingxiao He, Yiwei Ru, Haiqing Li, Nianfeng Liu, Zhenan Sun, T. Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BTAS.2017.8272763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Presentation attacks such as using a contact lens with a printed pattern or printouts of an iris can be utilized to bypass a biometric security system. The first international iris liveness competition was launched in 2013 in order to assess the performance of presentation attack detection (PAD) algorithms, with a second competition in 2015. This paper presents results of the third competition, LivDet-Iris 2017. Three software-based approaches to Presentation Attack Detection were submitted. Four datasets of live and spoof images were tested with an additional cross-sensor test. New datasets and novel situations of data have resulted in this competition being of a higher difficulty than previous competitions. Anonymous received the best results with a rate of rejected live samples of 3.36% and rate of accepted spoof samples of 14.71%. The results show that even with advances, printed iris attacks as well as patterned contacts lenses are still difficult for software-based systems to detect. Printed iris images were easier to be differentiated from live images in comparison to patterned contact lenses as was also seen in previous competitions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"80\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2017.8272763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2017.8272763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

摘要

展示攻击,例如使用带有打印图案的隐形眼镜或虹膜的打印输出,可以用来绕过生物识别安全系统。首届国际虹膜活性竞赛于2013年启动,旨在评估呈现攻击检测(PAD)算法的性能,第二届竞赛于2015年举行。本文介绍了第三届竞赛livet - iris 2017的结果。提出了三种基于软件的表示攻击检测方法。通过额外的交叉传感器测试测试了四个实时和欺骗图像数据集。新的数据集和新的数据情况导致本次比赛比以往的比赛具有更高的难度。匿名的效果最好,活体样本的拒绝率为3.36%,欺骗样本的接受率为14.71%。结果表明,即使有了进步,打印虹膜攻击和图案隐形眼镜仍然很难被基于软件的系统检测到。与图案隐形眼镜相比,打印的虹膜图像更容易与实时图像区分开来,这在之前的比赛中也可以看到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LivDet iris 2017 — Iris liveness detection competition 2017
Presentation attacks such as using a contact lens with a printed pattern or printouts of an iris can be utilized to bypass a biometric security system. The first international iris liveness competition was launched in 2013 in order to assess the performance of presentation attack detection (PAD) algorithms, with a second competition in 2015. This paper presents results of the third competition, LivDet-Iris 2017. Three software-based approaches to Presentation Attack Detection were submitted. Four datasets of live and spoof images were tested with an additional cross-sensor test. New datasets and novel situations of data have resulted in this competition being of a higher difficulty than previous competitions. Anonymous received the best results with a rate of rejected live samples of 3.36% and rate of accepted spoof samples of 14.71%. The results show that even with advances, printed iris attacks as well as patterned contacts lenses are still difficult for software-based systems to detect. Printed iris images were easier to be differentiated from live images in comparison to patterned contact lenses as was also seen in previous competitions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信