学习者的数学学习结果与两种力量类型的主动学习策略和学习单元的类型不同

A. Susanto, Sumiarti Sumiarti
{"title":"学习者的数学学习结果与两种力量类型的主动学习策略和学习单元的类型不同","authors":"A. Susanto, Sumiarti Sumiarti","doi":"10.15548/mej.v1i1.1547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to determine differences of learning outcomes among mathematics learners who were taught by using the strategy of learning the type of power two and the learning Cell strategy at class VII of Junior High School (SMPN) 31 Padang. The Average result of the students those who were taught by The Power of Two was 74,00 and 73,78 for The Learning Cell. The Hypothesis testing obtained 0,803 for the t count and = 1,645 for the T-table. This indicate that there is a low significance difference on the result mathematics taught by using active strategy The Power of Two and Learning Cell.","PeriodicalId":231880,"journal":{"name":"Math Educa Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik yang diajar dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif Tipe The Power of Two dan Tipe The Learning Cell\",\"authors\":\"A. Susanto, Sumiarti Sumiarti\",\"doi\":\"10.15548/mej.v1i1.1547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to determine differences of learning outcomes among mathematics learners who were taught by using the strategy of learning the type of power two and the learning Cell strategy at class VII of Junior High School (SMPN) 31 Padang. The Average result of the students those who were taught by The Power of Two was 74,00 and 73,78 for The Learning Cell. The Hypothesis testing obtained 0,803 for the t count and = 1,645 for the T-table. This indicate that there is a low significance difference on the result mathematics taught by using active strategy The Power of Two and Learning Cell.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Math Educa Journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Math Educa Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15548/mej.v1i1.1547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Math Educa Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15548/mej.v1i1.1547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在探讨巴东31中学七班采用幂二类型学习策略和学习单元策略教学的数学学习者学习成果的差异。“2的力量”课程的学生平均成绩为74,000分,“学习细胞”课程的学生平均成绩为73,78分。假设检验的t计数得到0,803,t表得到= 1,645。这表明使用主动策略“2的幂”和“学习细胞”教学数学的结果存在低显著性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik yang diajar dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif Tipe The Power of Two dan Tipe The Learning Cell
The aim of this study is to determine differences of learning outcomes among mathematics learners who were taught by using the strategy of learning the type of power two and the learning Cell strategy at class VII of Junior High School (SMPN) 31 Padang. The Average result of the students those who were taught by The Power of Two was 74,00 and 73,78 for The Learning Cell. The Hypothesis testing obtained 0,803 for the t count and = 1,645 for the T-table. This indicate that there is a low significance difference on the result mathematics taught by using active strategy The Power of Two and Learning Cell.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信