基于博弈的公平合同签订协议分析与改进

Xueming Wang, L. Weng
{"title":"基于博弈的公平合同签订协议分析与改进","authors":"Xueming Wang, L. Weng","doi":"10.1109/CIS.2010.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional temporal logic regards protocols as close system to analyze. In order to overcome the shortcoming of traditional temporal logic, an game-based analysis method is inducted. This method is applied to formal analyze a fair contract signing protocol, and then some defects of the protocol are found. An improvement protocol is proposed which fixes the flaw by adding some extra time limit information and an abort sub-protocol. The fairness and the timeliness of the improvement protocol are validated by ATL formula and Invariant Checking. It is found that the improvement protocol satisfies the timeliness and the fairness.","PeriodicalId":420515,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Game-Based Analysis and Improvement of a Fair Contract Signing Protocol\",\"authors\":\"Xueming Wang, L. Weng\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIS.2010.76\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditional temporal logic regards protocols as close system to analyze. In order to overcome the shortcoming of traditional temporal logic, an game-based analysis method is inducted. This method is applied to formal analyze a fair contract signing protocol, and then some defects of the protocol are found. An improvement protocol is proposed which fixes the flaw by adding some extra time limit information and an abort sub-protocol. The fairness and the timeliness of the improvement protocol are validated by ATL formula and Invariant Checking. It is found that the improvement protocol satisfies the timeliness and the fairness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":420515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIS.2010.76\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIS.2010.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

传统的时间逻辑将协议视为封闭的系统来分析。为了克服传统时间逻辑的不足,引入了一种基于博弈的分析方法。应用该方法对一个公平合同签署协议进行形式化分析,发现协议存在的一些缺陷。提出了一种改进协议,通过增加额外的时间限制信息和中止子协议来弥补这一缺陷。通过ATL公式和不变性检验验证了改进协议的公平性和时效性。结果表明,改进协议满足时效性和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Game-Based Analysis and Improvement of a Fair Contract Signing Protocol
Traditional temporal logic regards protocols as close system to analyze. In order to overcome the shortcoming of traditional temporal logic, an game-based analysis method is inducted. This method is applied to formal analyze a fair contract signing protocol, and then some defects of the protocol are found. An improvement protocol is proposed which fixes the flaw by adding some extra time limit information and an abort sub-protocol. The fairness and the timeliness of the improvement protocol are validated by ATL formula and Invariant Checking. It is found that the improvement protocol satisfies the timeliness and the fairness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信