CAMEL比率与市场盈利能力:孟加拉银行业研究

Imran Mahmud
{"title":"CAMEL比率与市场盈利能力:孟加拉银行业研究","authors":"Imran Mahmud","doi":"10.54728/jfmg-202209-00062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the study is to identify whether CAMEL ratios can predict the market profitability of listed banks in Bangladesh. To achieve this, a sample of 25 companies, for the period of 2010 to 2021, is used. Two dependent variables- Tobin’s Q and Adjusted Return are tested using fixed effect and random effect models respectively. Panel Corrected Standard Error (PCSE) model was also tested and interpreted to measure the reliability of the results. It is extrapolated that the CAMEL rating has a greater impact on Tobin’s Q (R2 value of 98%) than Adjusted Return with an R2 value of 30% only. The impact of CAMEL ratios differs depending on the measures of market profitability taken in the study. Only earning quality and management efficiency were found to be significant for both measures of market profitability. Additionally, COVID-19 was found to have a significant impact on both measures of market profitability. It was also conspicuous that earning quality and capital adequacy conform to theoretical sign when regressed with both Tobin’s Q and Adjusted Return.","PeriodicalId":165664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Markets and Governance","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CAMEL Ratios and Market Profitability: A study on Banking Sector in Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Imran Mahmud\",\"doi\":\"10.54728/jfmg-202209-00062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the study is to identify whether CAMEL ratios can predict the market profitability of listed banks in Bangladesh. To achieve this, a sample of 25 companies, for the period of 2010 to 2021, is used. Two dependent variables- Tobin’s Q and Adjusted Return are tested using fixed effect and random effect models respectively. Panel Corrected Standard Error (PCSE) model was also tested and interpreted to measure the reliability of the results. It is extrapolated that the CAMEL rating has a greater impact on Tobin’s Q (R2 value of 98%) than Adjusted Return with an R2 value of 30% only. The impact of CAMEL ratios differs depending on the measures of market profitability taken in the study. Only earning quality and management efficiency were found to be significant for both measures of market profitability. Additionally, COVID-19 was found to have a significant impact on both measures of market profitability. It was also conspicuous that earning quality and capital adequacy conform to theoretical sign when regressed with both Tobin’s Q and Adjusted Return.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Markets and Governance\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Markets and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54728/jfmg-202209-00062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Markets and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54728/jfmg-202209-00062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定CAMEL比率是否可以预测孟加拉国上市银行的市场盈利能力。为了实现这一目标,使用了2010年至2021年期间25家公司的样本。两个因变量Tobin’s Q和Adjusted Return分别使用固定效应和随机效应模型进行检验。面板校正标准误差(PCSE)模型也进行了测试和解释,以衡量结果的可靠性。可以推断,CAMEL评级对Tobin’s Q (R2值为98%)的影响大于R2值仅为30%的Adjusted Return。CAMEL比率的影响取决于研究中采取的市场盈利能力的措施。只有盈余质量和管理效率被发现对市场盈利能力的两个指标都是显著的。此外,研究发现,COVID-19对市场盈利能力的两项指标都产生了重大影响。同样值得注意的是,盈余质量和资本充足率在回归Tobin’s Q和Adjusted Return时都符合理论符号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CAMEL Ratios and Market Profitability: A study on Banking Sector in Bangladesh
The objective of the study is to identify whether CAMEL ratios can predict the market profitability of listed banks in Bangladesh. To achieve this, a sample of 25 companies, for the period of 2010 to 2021, is used. Two dependent variables- Tobin’s Q and Adjusted Return are tested using fixed effect and random effect models respectively. Panel Corrected Standard Error (PCSE) model was also tested and interpreted to measure the reliability of the results. It is extrapolated that the CAMEL rating has a greater impact on Tobin’s Q (R2 value of 98%) than Adjusted Return with an R2 value of 30% only. The impact of CAMEL ratios differs depending on the measures of market profitability taken in the study. Only earning quality and management efficiency were found to be significant for both measures of market profitability. Additionally, COVID-19 was found to have a significant impact on both measures of market profitability. It was also conspicuous that earning quality and capital adequacy conform to theoretical sign when regressed with both Tobin’s Q and Adjusted Return.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信