培根的《新亚特兰蒂斯》中的审查制度和知识制度

S. Wortham
{"title":"培根的《新亚特兰蒂斯》中的审查制度和知识制度","authors":"S. Wortham","doi":"10.7765/9781526137388.00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical readers of Bacon’s New Atlantis have often drawn attention to the complex relationship between, on the one hand, the production and dissemination of enlightened scientific knowledge in Bensalem – and, indeed, the forms of social community for which it implicitly provides a model – and, on the other, the secret or concealed conditions of this very same process of production. For example, Robert K. Faulkner in Francis Bacon and the Project of Progress notes that, while ‘every official performs his function [and] everyone does what he is ordered,’ nevertheless ‘all this order is the more remarkable since the relation of king, city, nation, state, and scientist is not clarified. The order that orders ... is hidden.’ Jerry Weinberger, meanwhile, argues that Bensalemite ‘science is shrouded in secrecy, denying the possibility of full enlightenment.’ Such secrecy surrounding the activities which contribute to the production of scientific knowledge Weinberger reads in terms of, as he sees it, Bacon’s idea that ‘the politics of science must be secret and retired because only the most resolute souls will be willing to embrace such a world with full knowledge of its moral risks and dangers.’ What these critics would appear to suggest, then, is that the production of various sorts of ground-breaking scientific knowledge and enlightened social relationships remain dependent, at bottom, upon a supplementary dose of censorship that simply cannot be dispensed","PeriodicalId":277823,"journal":{"name":"Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Censorship and the institution of knowledge in Bacon’s New Atlantis\",\"authors\":\"S. Wortham\",\"doi\":\"10.7765/9781526137388.00014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical readers of Bacon’s New Atlantis have often drawn attention to the complex relationship between, on the one hand, the production and dissemination of enlightened scientific knowledge in Bensalem – and, indeed, the forms of social community for which it implicitly provides a model – and, on the other, the secret or concealed conditions of this very same process of production. For example, Robert K. Faulkner in Francis Bacon and the Project of Progress notes that, while ‘every official performs his function [and] everyone does what he is ordered,’ nevertheless ‘all this order is the more remarkable since the relation of king, city, nation, state, and scientist is not clarified. The order that orders ... is hidden.’ Jerry Weinberger, meanwhile, argues that Bensalemite ‘science is shrouded in secrecy, denying the possibility of full enlightenment.’ Such secrecy surrounding the activities which contribute to the production of scientific knowledge Weinberger reads in terms of, as he sees it, Bacon’s idea that ‘the politics of science must be secret and retired because only the most resolute souls will be willing to embrace such a world with full knowledge of its moral risks and dangers.’ What these critics would appear to suggest, then, is that the production of various sorts of ground-breaking scientific knowledge and enlightened social relationships remain dependent, at bottom, upon a supplementary dose of censorship that simply cannot be dispensed\",\"PeriodicalId\":277823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137388.00014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137388.00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

培根《新亚特兰蒂斯》的批判读者经常注意到,一方面,在耶路撒冷,开明的科学知识的生产和传播——实际上,它隐含地提供了一种模式的社会共同体形式——与另一方面,这一生产过程的秘密或隐藏条件之间的复杂关系。例如,罗伯特·福克纳(Robert K. Faulkner)在《弗朗西斯·培根与进步计划》(Francis Bacon and the Project of Progress)中指出,虽然“每个官员都履行自己的职责,每个人都做他被命令做的事”,然而,“所有这些命令都是更加显著的,因为国王、城市、民族、国家和科学家之间的关系没有得到澄清。”命令的顺序……是隐藏的。与此同时,杰瑞·温伯格(Jerry Weinberger)认为,本萨勒姆派的“科学笼罩在秘密之中,否认了完全启蒙的可能性。”这种围绕有助于科学知识生产的活动的秘密,Weinberger在他看来,是根据培根的观点,“科学的政治必须是秘密和退休的,因为只有最坚定的灵魂才愿意拥抱这样一个世界,充分了解其道德风险和危险。”这些批评家似乎在暗示,各种突破性的科学知识和开明的社会关系的产生,从根本上说,仍然依赖于一剂补充的审查制度,而这种审查制度是根本无法分配的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Censorship and the institution of knowledge in Bacon’s New Atlantis
Critical readers of Bacon’s New Atlantis have often drawn attention to the complex relationship between, on the one hand, the production and dissemination of enlightened scientific knowledge in Bensalem – and, indeed, the forms of social community for which it implicitly provides a model – and, on the other, the secret or concealed conditions of this very same process of production. For example, Robert K. Faulkner in Francis Bacon and the Project of Progress notes that, while ‘every official performs his function [and] everyone does what he is ordered,’ nevertheless ‘all this order is the more remarkable since the relation of king, city, nation, state, and scientist is not clarified. The order that orders ... is hidden.’ Jerry Weinberger, meanwhile, argues that Bensalemite ‘science is shrouded in secrecy, denying the possibility of full enlightenment.’ Such secrecy surrounding the activities which contribute to the production of scientific knowledge Weinberger reads in terms of, as he sees it, Bacon’s idea that ‘the politics of science must be secret and retired because only the most resolute souls will be willing to embrace such a world with full knowledge of its moral risks and dangers.’ What these critics would appear to suggest, then, is that the production of various sorts of ground-breaking scientific knowledge and enlightened social relationships remain dependent, at bottom, upon a supplementary dose of censorship that simply cannot be dispensed
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信