整体，多重性或多声性:我们代表什么，我们从这里走向何方?

J. Learn. Anal. Pub Date : 2019-12-13 DOI:10.18608/jla.2019.63.6

C. Rosé

{"title":"整体，多重性或多声性:我们代表什么，我们从这里走向何方?","authors":"C. Rosé","doi":"10.18608/jla.2019.63.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution offers a commentary on Neil Selwyn’s write up of his keynote talk from the Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference in 2018 (Selwyn, this issue). The article has three main sections, namely an account of what Learning Analytics has done, an account of the values behind Learning Analytics, and some ideas for moving forward. Thus, this reflection will also address aspects of each of these.","PeriodicalId":145357,"journal":{"name":"J. Learn. Anal.","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monolith, Multiplicity or Multivocality: What do we stand for and where do we go from here?\",\"authors\":\"C. Rosé\",\"doi\":\"10.18608/jla.2019.63.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution offers a commentary on Neil Selwyn’s write up of his keynote talk from the Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference in 2018 (Selwyn, this issue). The article has three main sections, namely an account of what Learning Analytics has done, an account of the values behind Learning Analytics, and some ideas for moving forward. Thus, this reflection will also address aspects of each of these.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Learn. Anal.\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Learn. Anal.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Learn. Anal.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

这篇文章是对Neil Selwyn在2018年学习分析和知识会议(Selwyn，本期)上的主题演讲的评论。这篇文章有三个主要部分，即学习分析已经做了什么，学习分析背后的价值，以及一些向前发展的想法。因此，这个反思也将涉及这些方面。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Monolith, Multiplicity or Multivocality: What do we stand for and where do we go from here?

This contribution offers a commentary on Neil Selwyn’s write up of his keynote talk from the Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference in 2018 (Selwyn, this issue). The article has three main sections, namely an account of what Learning Analytics has done, an account of the values behind Learning Analytics, and some ideas for moving forward. Thus, this reflection will also address aspects of each of these.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

J. Learn. Anal.

自引率

0.00%

发文量