定义耦合度量的模型

E. Tempero, P. Ralph
{"title":"定义耦合度量的模型","authors":"E. Tempero, P. Ralph","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2016.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many metrics have been proposed to measure coupling—the degree of association between modules in a system. However, most metrics are under-defined, meaning that different tool developers can reasonably implement the same metric in many ways. This gives rise to families of metrics, which are superficially similar but potentially produce different results. To understand how different these metrics are, we propose a single model of coupling based on the concept of dependencies. This model is useful for defining existing coupling metrics, analysing their differences and clarifying divergent implementations. We demonstrate its efficacy by using it to describe existing coupling metrics and inform tool development. We have applied the tool to the 112 systems in the Qualitas Corpus, generating 21 million measurements from 88 coupling metrics. The simplicity of the tool implementation and the number of metrics it supports demonstrates the usefulness of our model.","PeriodicalId":339123,"journal":{"name":"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Model for Defining Coupling Metrics\",\"authors\":\"E. Tempero, P. Ralph\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC.2016.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many metrics have been proposed to measure coupling—the degree of association between modules in a system. However, most metrics are under-defined, meaning that different tool developers can reasonably implement the same metric in many ways. This gives rise to families of metrics, which are superficially similar but potentially produce different results. To understand how different these metrics are, we propose a single model of coupling based on the concept of dependencies. This model is useful for defining existing coupling metrics, analysing their differences and clarifying divergent implementations. We demonstrate its efficacy by using it to describe existing coupling metrics and inform tool development. We have applied the tool to the 112 systems in the Qualitas Corpus, generating 21 million measurements from 88 coupling metrics. The simplicity of the tool implementation and the number of metrics it supports demonstrates the usefulness of our model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2016.030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2016.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

已经提出了许多度量来度量耦合度——系统中模块之间的关联程度。然而,大多数度量标准是未定义的,这意味着不同的工具开发人员可以以多种方式合理地实现相同的度量标准。这就产生了一系列指标,这些指标表面上相似,但可能产生不同的结果。为了理解这些度量的不同之处,我们提出了一个基于依赖关系概念的单一耦合模型。该模型对于定义现有的耦合度量、分析它们之间的差异和澄清不同的实现非常有用。我们通过使用它来描述现有的耦合度量并告知工具开发来证明它的有效性。我们已经将该工具应用于Qualitas语料库中的112个系统,从88个耦合度量中生成了2100万个度量。工具实现的简单性和它支持的度量的数量证明了我们模型的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Model for Defining Coupling Metrics
Many metrics have been proposed to measure coupling—the degree of association between modules in a system. However, most metrics are under-defined, meaning that different tool developers can reasonably implement the same metric in many ways. This gives rise to families of metrics, which are superficially similar but potentially produce different results. To understand how different these metrics are, we propose a single model of coupling based on the concept of dependencies. This model is useful for defining existing coupling metrics, analysing their differences and clarifying divergent implementations. We demonstrate its efficacy by using it to describe existing coupling metrics and inform tool development. We have applied the tool to the 112 systems in the Qualitas Corpus, generating 21 million measurements from 88 coupling metrics. The simplicity of the tool implementation and the number of metrics it supports demonstrates the usefulness of our model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信