从成本效益分析的视角看预防原则

Artem Anyshchenko
{"title":"从成本效益分析的视角看预防原则","authors":"Artem Anyshchenko","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3326413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature on environmental law and policy tends to emphasise conceptual contradictions between the precautionary principle and cost-benefit analysis. This article argues that, though some theoretical inconsistencies have taken place, there is no significant contradictions between them. On the contrary, the precautionary principle and cost-benefit analysis are mutually dependent and closely connected with each other in many ways. While the two concepts might contrast due to differences in policy priorities, they tend to correlate on the level of environmental impact assessment. It seems that the relative value of the precautionary principle could be evaluated in the best possible way against cost-benefit analysis, and vice versa. Thus it is better to emphasise that the two concepts exist in a sort of symbiotic relationship that benefits them both.","PeriodicalId":129013,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Law eJournal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Precautionary Principle Through the Viewscreen of Cost-benefit Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Artem Anyshchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3326413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The literature on environmental law and policy tends to emphasise conceptual contradictions between the precautionary principle and cost-benefit analysis. This article argues that, though some theoretical inconsistencies have taken place, there is no significant contradictions between them. On the contrary, the precautionary principle and cost-benefit analysis are mutually dependent and closely connected with each other in many ways. While the two concepts might contrast due to differences in policy priorities, they tend to correlate on the level of environmental impact assessment. It seems that the relative value of the precautionary principle could be evaluated in the best possible way against cost-benefit analysis, and vice versa. Thus it is better to emphasise that the two concepts exist in a sort of symbiotic relationship that benefits them both.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy of Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy of Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3326413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3326413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于环境法和政策的文献往往强调预防原则和成本效益分析之间的概念矛盾。本文认为,虽然存在一些理论上的不一致,但它们之间并没有明显的矛盾。相反,预防原则和成本效益分析在许多方面是相互依存和密切联系的。虽然这两个概念可能由于政策优先次序的不同而形成对比,但它们往往在环境影响评价的水平上相互关联。预防原则的相对价值似乎可以用最好的方法来评价,而不是成本效益分析,反之亦然。因此,最好强调这两个概念存在于一种共生关系中,对双方都有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Precautionary Principle Through the Viewscreen of Cost-benefit Analysis
The literature on environmental law and policy tends to emphasise conceptual contradictions between the precautionary principle and cost-benefit analysis. This article argues that, though some theoretical inconsistencies have taken place, there is no significant contradictions between them. On the contrary, the precautionary principle and cost-benefit analysis are mutually dependent and closely connected with each other in many ways. While the two concepts might contrast due to differences in policy priorities, they tend to correlate on the level of environmental impact assessment. It seems that the relative value of the precautionary principle could be evaluated in the best possible way against cost-benefit analysis, and vice versa. Thus it is better to emphasise that the two concepts exist in a sort of symbiotic relationship that benefits them both.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信