当私人行为者参与驱逐非正规移民时,如何确定问责制?

M. Price
{"title":"当私人行为者参与驱逐非正规移民时,如何确定问责制?","authors":"M. Price","doi":"10.1108/s1059-43372021000086a006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Migration control is being increasingly privatised, and the effect this has on the access to justice of irregular migrants is deeply concerning. Privatisation creates a corporate veil in this sector, which clouds the appropriate lines of accountability. It generates confusion about the boundary between the state and the private actors, and it is not clear enough how accountability is to be determined when harms are committed in the deportation process. This chapter contends that there is a gap between the existence of accountability mechanisms and the effective application of them to private actors. A discussion of criminal and human rights perspectives through the lens of the Jimmy Mubenga case will illustrate that privatisation has had a detrimental effect on accountability, and this is largely due to the hostile context in which it operates and the way society conceives migrants generally.","PeriodicalId":192544,"journal":{"name":"Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability?","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How is Accountability Determined When Private Actors are Involved in the Deportation of Irregular Migrants?\",\"authors\":\"M. Price\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/s1059-43372021000086a006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Migration control is being increasingly privatised, and the effect this has on the access to justice of irregular migrants is deeply concerning. Privatisation creates a corporate veil in this sector, which clouds the appropriate lines of accountability. It generates confusion about the boundary between the state and the private actors, and it is not clear enough how accountability is to be determined when harms are committed in the deportation process. This chapter contends that there is a gap between the existence of accountability mechanisms and the effective application of them to private actors. A discussion of criminal and human rights perspectives through the lens of the Jimmy Mubenga case will illustrate that privatisation has had a detrimental effect on accountability, and this is largely due to the hostile context in which it operates and the way society conceives migrants generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability?\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1059-43372021000086a006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1059-43372021000086a006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

移徙管制日益私有化,这对非正规移徙者诉诸司法的影响令人深感关切。私有化在这一领域蒙上了一层企业面纱,遮蔽了适当的问责界限。它造成了对国家和私人行为者之间界限的混淆,而且在驱逐过程中造成伤害时,如何确定问责也不够清楚。本章认为,问责机制的存在与问责机制对私人行为者的有效应用之间存在差距。通过对Jimmy Mubenga案件的刑事和人权视角的讨论,将说明私有化对问责制产生了有害的影响,这主要是由于私有化运作的敌对环境以及社会对移民的普遍看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How is Accountability Determined When Private Actors are Involved in the Deportation of Irregular Migrants?
Migration control is being increasingly privatised, and the effect this has on the access to justice of irregular migrants is deeply concerning. Privatisation creates a corporate veil in this sector, which clouds the appropriate lines of accountability. It generates confusion about the boundary between the state and the private actors, and it is not clear enough how accountability is to be determined when harms are committed in the deportation process. This chapter contends that there is a gap between the existence of accountability mechanisms and the effective application of them to private actors. A discussion of criminal and human rights perspectives through the lens of the Jimmy Mubenga case will illustrate that privatisation has had a detrimental effect on accountability, and this is largely due to the hostile context in which it operates and the way society conceives migrants generally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信