执行计算的安全策略

Anita K. Jones, R. Lipton
{"title":"执行计算的安全策略","authors":"Anita K. Jones, R. Lipton","doi":"10.1145/800213.806538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security policies define who may use what information in a computer system. Protection mechanisms are built into a system to enforce security policies. In most systems, however, it is quite unclear what policies a mechanism can or does enforce. This paper defines security policies and protection mechanisms precisely and bridges the gap between them with the concept of soundness: whether a protection mechanism enforces a policy. Different sound protection mechanisms for the same policy can then be compared. We also show that the “union” of mechanisms for the same program produces a more “complete” mechanism. Although a “maximal” mechanism exists, it cannot necessarily be constructed.","PeriodicalId":191892,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the fifth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The enforcement of security policies for computation\",\"authors\":\"Anita K. Jones, R. Lipton\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800213.806538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Security policies define who may use what information in a computer system. Protection mechanisms are built into a system to enforce security policies. In most systems, however, it is quite unclear what policies a mechanism can or does enforce. This paper defines security policies and protection mechanisms precisely and bridges the gap between them with the concept of soundness: whether a protection mechanism enforces a policy. Different sound protection mechanisms for the same policy can then be compared. We also show that the “union” of mechanisms for the same program produces a more “complete” mechanism. Although a “maximal” mechanism exists, it cannot necessarily be constructed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the fifth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"70\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the fifth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800213.806538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the fifth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800213.806538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

摘要

安全策略定义了谁可以使用计算机系统中的哪些信息。将保护机制内置于系统中以执行安全策略。然而,在大多数系统中,机制能够执行或执行的策略是非常不清楚的。本文精确地定义了安全策略和保护机制,并用健全性(即保护机制是否执行策略)的概念弥合了它们之间的差距。然后可以比较同一政策的不同声音保护机制。我们还表明,同一程序的机制的“联合”产生了更“完整”的机制。尽管存在“最大”机制,但它不一定被构建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The enforcement of security policies for computation
Security policies define who may use what information in a computer system. Protection mechanisms are built into a system to enforce security policies. In most systems, however, it is quite unclear what policies a mechanism can or does enforce. This paper defines security policies and protection mechanisms precisely and bridges the gap between them with the concept of soundness: whether a protection mechanism enforces a policy. Different sound protection mechanisms for the same policy can then be compared. We also show that the “union” of mechanisms for the same program produces a more “complete” mechanism. Although a “maximal” mechanism exists, it cannot necessarily be constructed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信