{"title":"结核病和艾滋病毒感染","authors":"A.M. Panteleev","doi":"10.33029/9704-6733-6-sim-2022-1-352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"trial.' Should not their dogmatic approach follow, rather than precede, publication of data that support non-recapping? There is no published evidence to show that non-recapping reduces the incidence of needlestick injury. As Professor D C Anderson and colleagues rightly point out, the Needle Guard significantly reduces the rate of needlestick injury associated with venepuncture.' It is a matter of concern that people working in a clinical trials centre choose to ignore published data and fail to present new data to corroborate their views.","PeriodicalId":213805,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and HIV Infection","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tuberculosis and HIV Infection\",\"authors\":\"A.M. Panteleev\",\"doi\":\"10.33029/9704-6733-6-sim-2022-1-352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"trial.' Should not their dogmatic approach follow, rather than precede, publication of data that support non-recapping? There is no published evidence to show that non-recapping reduces the incidence of needlestick injury. As Professor D C Anderson and colleagues rightly point out, the Needle Guard significantly reduces the rate of needlestick injury associated with venepuncture.' It is a matter of concern that people working in a clinical trials centre choose to ignore published data and fail to present new data to corroborate their views.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuberculosis and HIV Infection\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuberculosis and HIV Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33029/9704-6733-6-sim-2022-1-352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis and HIV Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33029/9704-6733-6-sim-2022-1-352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
trial.' Should not their dogmatic approach follow, rather than precede, publication of data that support non-recapping? There is no published evidence to show that non-recapping reduces the incidence of needlestick injury. As Professor D C Anderson and colleagues rightly point out, the Needle Guard significantly reduces the rate of needlestick injury associated with venepuncture.' It is a matter of concern that people working in a clinical trials centre choose to ignore published data and fail to present new data to corroborate their views.