不伤害:揭发医疗保险欺诈

Melvin A. Lamboy-Ruiz, Britton A. McKay, Andrea M. Scheetz
{"title":"不伤害:揭发医疗保险欺诈","authors":"Melvin A. Lamboy-Ruiz, Britton A. McKay, Andrea M. Scheetz","doi":"10.2308/jfar-2021-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods.","PeriodicalId":149240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud\",\"authors\":\"Melvin A. Lamboy-Ruiz, Britton A. McKay, Andrea M. Scheetz\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/jfar-2021-015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2021-015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2021-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,医疗保健欺诈的高发率导致建立了多个举报欺诈的渠道,如医疗保险热线、监察长办公室,以及提交与举报人奖励相关的《虚假申报法》诉讼。尽管举报人的发生率很高,但对该行业举报人的职业角色、欺诈类型等举报人举报因素的研究却很少,这些因素之间的相互作用也不得而知。在本研究中,来自两个不同职业角色的参与者通过上述三个报告渠道以两种不同的账单欺诈类型为条件,披露了他们报告医疗保险欺诈的可能性。结果表明,尽管两种职业角色的工作者无论报告渠道如何,都表现出相似的报告欺诈的可能性,但欺诈类型及其与职业角色的相互作用影响了部分而不是全部的报告可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do No Harm: Whistleblowing on Medicare Fraud
The high incidence of healthcare fraud in the United States resulted in the creation of multiple outlets to report fraud, such as the Medicare Hotline, the Office of the Inspector General, and the filing of False Claim Act lawsuits associated with whistleblower rewards. Despite the high incidence, examinations of whistleblowing factors in this industry, such as whistleblowers’ professional roles and fraud types, are scarce, and the interaction effects of these factors are unknown. In this study, participants from two different professional roles disclose their likelihood of reporting Medicare fraud through the aforementioned three reporting outlets conditional on two different billing fraud types. The results indicate that although workers in both professional roles show similar likelihoods to report fraud regardless of the reporting outlet, fraud type and its interaction with the professional role influence some but not all the reporting likelihoods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信