先进智能系统对用户共情表情的感知

Jacqueline Urakami, B. A. Moore, Sujitra Sutthithatip, Sung Park
{"title":"先进智能系统对用户共情表情的感知","authors":"Jacqueline Urakami, B. A. Moore, Sujitra Sutthithatip, Sung Park","doi":"10.1145/3349537.3351895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this study was to examine user\\textquoteright s perception of expressions of empathy by an autonomous system. In a survey eight different components of empathy identified in literature studies and prior tests (Expressing own feelings, Expressing to know what the other feels, Helping, Showing interest, Taking the others perspective, Displaying regard, Situational understanding, and Agreement) were compared to neutral expressions. Differences in participants evaluations were found across the components of empathy as well as individual differences were revealed. Expressions of cognitive empathy (Showing interest, situational understanding) and expressions of empathy of assistance (helping) were perceived positively by participants. However, expressions of affective empathy (expressing own feelings, expressing to know what the other feels) received mainly negative ratings. Cluster analysis revealed individual differences especially for items relating to affective empathy. Whereas one group of participants identified in the cluster analysis rated expressions of affective empathy negatively, a second group of participants rated these expressions positively. Furthermore, large differences across participants also existed for taking the other's perspective, a component of cognitive empathy. Integrating expressions of empathy in human-machine interaction is a sensitive issue and designers must carefully choose what components of empathy are adequate depending on the situational circumstances and the targeted user group.","PeriodicalId":188834,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Users' Perception of Empathic Expressions by an Advanced Intelligent System\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Urakami, B. A. Moore, Sujitra Sutthithatip, Sung Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3349537.3351895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of this study was to examine user\\\\textquoteright s perception of expressions of empathy by an autonomous system. In a survey eight different components of empathy identified in literature studies and prior tests (Expressing own feelings, Expressing to know what the other feels, Helping, Showing interest, Taking the others perspective, Displaying regard, Situational understanding, and Agreement) were compared to neutral expressions. Differences in participants evaluations were found across the components of empathy as well as individual differences were revealed. Expressions of cognitive empathy (Showing interest, situational understanding) and expressions of empathy of assistance (helping) were perceived positively by participants. However, expressions of affective empathy (expressing own feelings, expressing to know what the other feels) received mainly negative ratings. Cluster analysis revealed individual differences especially for items relating to affective empathy. Whereas one group of participants identified in the cluster analysis rated expressions of affective empathy negatively, a second group of participants rated these expressions positively. Furthermore, large differences across participants also existed for taking the other's perspective, a component of cognitive empathy. Integrating expressions of empathy in human-machine interaction is a sensitive issue and designers must carefully choose what components of empathy are adequate depending on the situational circumstances and the targeted user group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3349537.3351895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3349537.3351895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本研究的目的是检验自主系统对用户移情表达的感知。在一项调查中,从文献研究和先前的测试中确定的共情的八个不同组成部分(表达自己的感受,表达了解他人的感受,帮助,表示兴趣,考虑他人的观点,表示尊重,情境理解和同意)与中性表达进行了比较。在共情各组成部分中发现了参与者评价的差异,并揭示了个体差异。认知共情(表示兴趣、情境理解)和协助共情(帮助)的表达被参与者积极感知。然而,情感共情(表达自己的感受,表达知道对方的感受)的表达主要是负面的。聚类分析揭示了个体差异,尤其是与情感共情相关的项目。在聚类分析中,一组参与者对情感共情表达的评价是负面的,而另一组参与者对这些表达的评价是积极的。此外,参与者在考虑他人观点方面也存在很大差异,这是认知同理心的一个组成部分。在人机交互中整合共情表达是一个敏感的问题,设计师必须根据情境和目标用户群体仔细选择哪些共情成分是足够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Users' Perception of Empathic Expressions by an Advanced Intelligent System
The goal of this study was to examine user\textquoteright s perception of expressions of empathy by an autonomous system. In a survey eight different components of empathy identified in literature studies and prior tests (Expressing own feelings, Expressing to know what the other feels, Helping, Showing interest, Taking the others perspective, Displaying regard, Situational understanding, and Agreement) were compared to neutral expressions. Differences in participants evaluations were found across the components of empathy as well as individual differences were revealed. Expressions of cognitive empathy (Showing interest, situational understanding) and expressions of empathy of assistance (helping) were perceived positively by participants. However, expressions of affective empathy (expressing own feelings, expressing to know what the other feels) received mainly negative ratings. Cluster analysis revealed individual differences especially for items relating to affective empathy. Whereas one group of participants identified in the cluster analysis rated expressions of affective empathy negatively, a second group of participants rated these expressions positively. Furthermore, large differences across participants also existed for taking the other's perspective, a component of cognitive empathy. Integrating expressions of empathy in human-machine interaction is a sensitive issue and designers must carefully choose what components of empathy are adequate depending on the situational circumstances and the targeted user group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信