高校教师评价工具分析:文献分析法

Shahid Rafiq, Shahzada Qaisar, Intzar Hussain Butt
{"title":"高校教师评价工具分析:文献分析法","authors":"Shahid Rafiq, Shahzada Qaisar, Intzar Hussain Butt","doi":"10.51380/gujr-38-02-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prime aim of this research was to analyze the tools used for the teacher evaluation process in public and private universities of Lahore. The research was qualitative in its nature and follows an interpretive research paradigm. The researcher used the document analysis technique for the analysis of documents. The tools were collected by visiting the universities' concerned departments for analysis. All collected tools were reviewed and analyzed against the criteria set by four experts from the qualitative domain. It was identified that teacher evaluation tools of the private sector universities were more comprehensive and detailed and self-developed as compared to the public universities. The public sector universities were using only single-page tools. It was also pointed out that the tools of the public sector universities had very limited aspects of the teacher’s teaching, while private universities’ tools had more aspects and were exhaustive. This article might provide the source material for future researchers and policymakers to ponder the area of teacher evaluation too.","PeriodicalId":249444,"journal":{"name":"Gomal University Journal of Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF TOOLS USED FOR TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL: A DOCUMENT ANALYSIS APPROACH\",\"authors\":\"Shahid Rafiq, Shahzada Qaisar, Intzar Hussain Butt\",\"doi\":\"10.51380/gujr-38-02-08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The prime aim of this research was to analyze the tools used for the teacher evaluation process in public and private universities of Lahore. The research was qualitative in its nature and follows an interpretive research paradigm. The researcher used the document analysis technique for the analysis of documents. The tools were collected by visiting the universities' concerned departments for analysis. All collected tools were reviewed and analyzed against the criteria set by four experts from the qualitative domain. It was identified that teacher evaluation tools of the private sector universities were more comprehensive and detailed and self-developed as compared to the public universities. The public sector universities were using only single-page tools. It was also pointed out that the tools of the public sector universities had very limited aspects of the teacher’s teaching, while private universities’ tools had more aspects and were exhaustive. This article might provide the source material for future researchers and policymakers to ponder the area of teacher evaluation too.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gomal University Journal of Research\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gomal University Journal of Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-38-02-08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gomal University Journal of Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-38-02-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的主要目的是分析拉合尔公立和私立大学教师评估过程中使用的工具。该研究本质上是定性的,并遵循解释性研究范式。研究者运用文献分析技术对文献进行分析。这些工具是通过访问各大学的相关部门进行分析收集的。根据四位定性领域的专家所设定的标准,对所有收集到的工具进行了审查和分析。与公立大学相比,私立大学的教师评价工具更全面、更详细,而且是自主开发的。公立大学只使用单页工具。也有人指出,公立大学的工具在教师教学方面非常有限,而私立大学的工具则有更多的方面,而且是详尽的。本文也可为未来研究者和政策制定者对教师评价领域的思考提供参考资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALYSIS OF TOOLS USED FOR TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL: A DOCUMENT ANALYSIS APPROACH
The prime aim of this research was to analyze the tools used for the teacher evaluation process in public and private universities of Lahore. The research was qualitative in its nature and follows an interpretive research paradigm. The researcher used the document analysis technique for the analysis of documents. The tools were collected by visiting the universities' concerned departments for analysis. All collected tools were reviewed and analyzed against the criteria set by four experts from the qualitative domain. It was identified that teacher evaluation tools of the private sector universities were more comprehensive and detailed and self-developed as compared to the public universities. The public sector universities were using only single-page tools. It was also pointed out that the tools of the public sector universities had very limited aspects of the teacher’s teaching, while private universities’ tools had more aspects and were exhaustive. This article might provide the source material for future researchers and policymakers to ponder the area of teacher evaluation too.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信