制定2019冠状病毒病大流行期间牙科程序感染控制框架的风险分层工具

Beenish Abbas, S. Abbas, Iqra Saleem, Summiya Asghar, F. Gulfam, Muhammad Umair
{"title":"制定2019冠状病毒病大流行期间牙科程序感染控制框架的风险分层工具","authors":"Beenish Abbas, S. Abbas, Iqra Saleem, Summiya Asghar, F. Gulfam, Muhammad Umair","doi":"10.24018/ejdent.2022.3.2.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To develop a framework for infection control in the spectrum of dental procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. \nMethodology: The study was conducted from Oct to Dec 2021 after approval for ethical review board of Foundation university college of dentistry Ref no (    ). Patients undergoing various dental procedures were enrolled after written and verbal informed consent. Risk Stratification of each procedure was done applying novel risk assessment scoring system, according to the level of risk contact with saliva was given score 1, contact with blood scored as 2, production of aerosol (low level) through triple syringe was given score 3, high aerosol production by ultrasonic piezoelectric instruments was scored as 4. If the complete duration of the dental procedure was >60 min score assigned was 0.75, for procedures with 30 to 60 mins duration score specified was 0.50, if the duration of the procedure was less than 30 min score for that procedure was 0.25. For each patient total score of all these parameters was accumulated to grade risk of SARS -CoV-2 transmission as low (score <4), medium (score 4 to 6), or high (score >6) depending upon the accumulative score of each procedure. \nResults: Nine hundred and fifteen patients with a gender distribution of 163 (17.9%) males and 748 (82.1%) females with an age range < 18 – 45 years undergoing the dental procedure were enrolled. Out of 915, 436 (47.6%) procedures were found to be low risk, 38 (4.1%) moderate risk, and 437 (47.7%) high risk. Out of 174 maxillofacial procedures, only 18 (10.3%) were of high risk, similarly out of 113 orthodontics procedures, only 1 (0.9%) was of high risk and for 147 prosthodontic procedures, there were 55 (37.4%) high-risk procedures. On the other hand, for operative dentistry procedures (n=181), majority of 128 (70.7%) posed a high risk, among pediatrics procedures (n=92) there were 62 (67.4%) high-risk procedures and for periodontics (n=204) about 173 (84.8%) were of high-risk nature. Therefore, the majority of the high-risk procedures belonged to operative, pediatrics, and periodontics specialty as compared to other specialties (p<0.001). \nConclusion: The majority of the high-risk dental procedures belonged to operative, pediatrics, and periodontics specialty as compared to other specialties.","PeriodicalId":197045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Stratification Tool to Develop Framework for Infection Control in Spectrum of Dental Procedures during COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Beenish Abbas, S. Abbas, Iqra Saleem, Summiya Asghar, F. Gulfam, Muhammad Umair\",\"doi\":\"10.24018/ejdent.2022.3.2.184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To develop a framework for infection control in the spectrum of dental procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. \\nMethodology: The study was conducted from Oct to Dec 2021 after approval for ethical review board of Foundation university college of dentistry Ref no (    ). Patients undergoing various dental procedures were enrolled after written and verbal informed consent. Risk Stratification of each procedure was done applying novel risk assessment scoring system, according to the level of risk contact with saliva was given score 1, contact with blood scored as 2, production of aerosol (low level) through triple syringe was given score 3, high aerosol production by ultrasonic piezoelectric instruments was scored as 4. If the complete duration of the dental procedure was >60 min score assigned was 0.75, for procedures with 30 to 60 mins duration score specified was 0.50, if the duration of the procedure was less than 30 min score for that procedure was 0.25. For each patient total score of all these parameters was accumulated to grade risk of SARS -CoV-2 transmission as low (score <4), medium (score 4 to 6), or high (score >6) depending upon the accumulative score of each procedure. \\nResults: Nine hundred and fifteen patients with a gender distribution of 163 (17.9%) males and 748 (82.1%) females with an age range < 18 – 45 years undergoing the dental procedure were enrolled. Out of 915, 436 (47.6%) procedures were found to be low risk, 38 (4.1%) moderate risk, and 437 (47.7%) high risk. Out of 174 maxillofacial procedures, only 18 (10.3%) were of high risk, similarly out of 113 orthodontics procedures, only 1 (0.9%) was of high risk and for 147 prosthodontic procedures, there were 55 (37.4%) high-risk procedures. On the other hand, for operative dentistry procedures (n=181), majority of 128 (70.7%) posed a high risk, among pediatrics procedures (n=92) there were 62 (67.4%) high-risk procedures and for periodontics (n=204) about 173 (84.8%) were of high-risk nature. Therefore, the majority of the high-risk procedures belonged to operative, pediatrics, and periodontics specialty as compared to other specialties (p<0.001). \\nConclusion: The majority of the high-risk dental procedures belonged to operative, pediatrics, and periodontics specialty as compared to other specialties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejdent.2022.3.2.184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejdent.2022.3.2.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立2019冠状病毒病大流行期间牙科手术感染控制框架。方法:本研究于2021年10月至12月进行,经基础大学牙科学院伦理审查委员会批准,文献编号()。接受各种牙科手术的患者在书面和口头知情同意后入组。应用新颖的风险评估评分系统对各环节进行风险分层,根据风险程度,唾液接触评分为1分,血液接触评分为2分,三针注射器产生气溶胶(低水平)评分为3分,超声压电仪器产生气溶胶(高水平)评分为4分。如果整个牙科手术持续时间大于60分钟,评分为0.75,对于30到60分钟的手术,评分为0.50,如果手术持续时间小于30分钟,评分为0.25。根据每个步骤的累积得分,累积每位患者所有这些参数的总分,将SARS -CoV-2传播风险评级为低(得分6)。结果:共纳入915例患者,其中男性163例(17.9%),女性748例(82.1%),年龄< 18 - 45岁。在915例手术中,436例(47.6%)为低风险,38例(4.1%)为中度风险,437例(47.7%)为高风险。174例颌面部手术中,高危手术仅18例(10.3%);113例正畸手术中,高危手术仅1例(0.9%);147例修复手术中,高危手术55例(37.4%)。另一方面,牙科手术(n=181) 128例高危手术中多数(70.7%),儿科手术(n=92)中62例(67.4%),牙周病(n=204)中173例(84.8%)为高危手术。因此,与其他专科相比,大多数高危手术属于外科、儿科和牙周病专科(p<0.001)。结论:与其他专科相比,高危牙科手术以外科、儿科和牙周病专科为主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Stratification Tool to Develop Framework for Infection Control in Spectrum of Dental Procedures during COVID-19 Pandemic
Objective: To develop a framework for infection control in the spectrum of dental procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology: The study was conducted from Oct to Dec 2021 after approval for ethical review board of Foundation university college of dentistry Ref no (    ). Patients undergoing various dental procedures were enrolled after written and verbal informed consent. Risk Stratification of each procedure was done applying novel risk assessment scoring system, according to the level of risk contact with saliva was given score 1, contact with blood scored as 2, production of aerosol (low level) through triple syringe was given score 3, high aerosol production by ultrasonic piezoelectric instruments was scored as 4. If the complete duration of the dental procedure was >60 min score assigned was 0.75, for procedures with 30 to 60 mins duration score specified was 0.50, if the duration of the procedure was less than 30 min score for that procedure was 0.25. For each patient total score of all these parameters was accumulated to grade risk of SARS -CoV-2 transmission as low (score <4), medium (score 4 to 6), or high (score >6) depending upon the accumulative score of each procedure. Results: Nine hundred and fifteen patients with a gender distribution of 163 (17.9%) males and 748 (82.1%) females with an age range < 18 – 45 years undergoing the dental procedure were enrolled. Out of 915, 436 (47.6%) procedures were found to be low risk, 38 (4.1%) moderate risk, and 437 (47.7%) high risk. Out of 174 maxillofacial procedures, only 18 (10.3%) were of high risk, similarly out of 113 orthodontics procedures, only 1 (0.9%) was of high risk and for 147 prosthodontic procedures, there were 55 (37.4%) high-risk procedures. On the other hand, for operative dentistry procedures (n=181), majority of 128 (70.7%) posed a high risk, among pediatrics procedures (n=92) there were 62 (67.4%) high-risk procedures and for periodontics (n=204) about 173 (84.8%) were of high-risk nature. Therefore, the majority of the high-risk procedures belonged to operative, pediatrics, and periodontics specialty as compared to other specialties (p<0.001). Conclusion: The majority of the high-risk dental procedures belonged to operative, pediatrics, and periodontics specialty as compared to other specialties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信