{"title":"基督教哲学与残疾倡导","authors":"K. Timpe","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198834106.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, Kevin Timpe explores a number of similarities between one approach to Christian philosophy and disability advocacy. Both tasks are normatively loaded in that they assume certain views about truth, the good life, the extant and source of value. Both are hermeneutically situated, shaped by their historical contexts, and as a result are also developmental—i.e., the particular normative agenda changes as the context develops. Finally, Timpe argues that Christian philosophy and disability are inherently communal, both in that they’re done communally and also that they have communal effects.","PeriodicalId":266212,"journal":{"name":"Christian Philosophy","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Christian Philosophy and Disability Advocacy\",\"authors\":\"K. Timpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198834106.003.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this chapter, Kevin Timpe explores a number of similarities between one approach to Christian philosophy and disability advocacy. Both tasks are normatively loaded in that they assume certain views about truth, the good life, the extant and source of value. Both are hermeneutically situated, shaped by their historical contexts, and as a result are also developmental—i.e., the particular normative agenda changes as the context develops. Finally, Timpe argues that Christian philosophy and disability are inherently communal, both in that they’re done communally and also that they have communal effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":266212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christian Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christian Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198834106.003.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198834106.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this chapter, Kevin Timpe explores a number of similarities between one approach to Christian philosophy and disability advocacy. Both tasks are normatively loaded in that they assume certain views about truth, the good life, the extant and source of value. Both are hermeneutically situated, shaped by their historical contexts, and as a result are also developmental—i.e., the particular normative agenda changes as the context develops. Finally, Timpe argues that Christian philosophy and disability are inherently communal, both in that they’re done communally and also that they have communal effects.