蒙古气旋两次沙尘暴过程的比较分析

Hengde Zhang, Zhiping Zong, Cong Hua, Yani Zhang, Bihui Zhang
{"title":"蒙古气旋两次沙尘暴过程的比较分析","authors":"Hengde Zhang, Zhiping Zong, Cong Hua, Yani Zhang, Bihui Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICACI.2012.6463267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two sandstorm processes caused by Mongolian cyclone were comparatively analyzed and diagnosed. The first process occurred during 19-22 March 2010 (case 1) and the second one during 28-30 April 2011 (case 2). The result showed that case 1 had wider range, stronger intensity and longer duration than case 2. Mongolian cyclones and upper cold vortex were main causes of these two cases. The cold front moved more southeastward and covered a larger area with stronger northerly wind in case 1. And the greater pressure gradient between cyclone center and high-pressure center was also contributed to the wider and stronger dust weather. Besides, secondary cold-front and supplemental cold air were propitious to the long-lasting dust weather. Vertical velocity was a good indication to sandstorms, and the upward motion area in case 1 was significantly larger than case 2. Helicity distribution demonstrated strong upward vortex motion which was helpful in sand rising at middle and lower troposphere, and the helicity in case 1 was more obvious. Cold advection and momentum downwash contributed to the intensification of surface pressure, cold high and pressure gradient, which leaded to stronger ground transformer wind and was favorable to the occurring of sandstorm. Case 1 had more obvious momentum downwash and transformer wind in the two cases. The decline of Ri along with increasing vertical wind shear and unstable stratification aroused and downstream transferred the sandstorm.","PeriodicalId":404759,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of two sandstorm processes caused by Mongolian cyclone\",\"authors\":\"Hengde Zhang, Zhiping Zong, Cong Hua, Yani Zhang, Bihui Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICACI.2012.6463267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two sandstorm processes caused by Mongolian cyclone were comparatively analyzed and diagnosed. The first process occurred during 19-22 March 2010 (case 1) and the second one during 28-30 April 2011 (case 2). The result showed that case 1 had wider range, stronger intensity and longer duration than case 2. Mongolian cyclones and upper cold vortex were main causes of these two cases. The cold front moved more southeastward and covered a larger area with stronger northerly wind in case 1. And the greater pressure gradient between cyclone center and high-pressure center was also contributed to the wider and stronger dust weather. Besides, secondary cold-front and supplemental cold air were propitious to the long-lasting dust weather. Vertical velocity was a good indication to sandstorms, and the upward motion area in case 1 was significantly larger than case 2. Helicity distribution demonstrated strong upward vortex motion which was helpful in sand rising at middle and lower troposphere, and the helicity in case 1 was more obvious. Cold advection and momentum downwash contributed to the intensification of surface pressure, cold high and pressure gradient, which leaded to stronger ground transformer wind and was favorable to the occurring of sandstorm. Case 1 had more obvious momentum downwash and transformer wind in the two cases. The decline of Ri along with increasing vertical wind shear and unstable stratification aroused and downstream transferred the sandstorm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACI.2012.6463267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACI.2012.6463267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对蒙古气旋引起的两次沙尘暴过程进行了比较分析和诊断。第一次发生在2010年3月19-22日(病例1),第二次发生在2011年4月28-30日(病例2)。结果表明,病例1比病例2范围更广、强度更强、持续时间更长。蒙古气旋和上层冷涡是造成这两种情况的主要原因。在情形1中,冷锋更偏向东南方向移动,覆盖面积更大,偏北风更强。气旋中心与高压中心之间较大的压力梯度也导致了沙尘暴天气范围更广、强度更强。此外,二次冷锋和补充冷空气有利于沙尘天气的持续。垂直速度对沙尘暴有较好的指示作用,且情况1的向上运动面积明显大于情况2。螺旋度分布表现出较强的上升涡运动,有利于对流层中下层的沙尘上升,且情形1的螺旋度更为明显。冷平流和动量下洗使地面气压、冷高压和气压梯度增强,导致地面变压器风增强,有利于沙尘暴的发生。在两种情况下,病例1的动量下冲和变压器风更为明显。Ri的下降伴随着垂直风切变的增加和不稳定的分层引起并向下游转移沙尘暴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of two sandstorm processes caused by Mongolian cyclone
Two sandstorm processes caused by Mongolian cyclone were comparatively analyzed and diagnosed. The first process occurred during 19-22 March 2010 (case 1) and the second one during 28-30 April 2011 (case 2). The result showed that case 1 had wider range, stronger intensity and longer duration than case 2. Mongolian cyclones and upper cold vortex were main causes of these two cases. The cold front moved more southeastward and covered a larger area with stronger northerly wind in case 1. And the greater pressure gradient between cyclone center and high-pressure center was also contributed to the wider and stronger dust weather. Besides, secondary cold-front and supplemental cold air were propitious to the long-lasting dust weather. Vertical velocity was a good indication to sandstorms, and the upward motion area in case 1 was significantly larger than case 2. Helicity distribution demonstrated strong upward vortex motion which was helpful in sand rising at middle and lower troposphere, and the helicity in case 1 was more obvious. Cold advection and momentum downwash contributed to the intensification of surface pressure, cold high and pressure gradient, which leaded to stronger ground transformer wind and was favorable to the occurring of sandstorm. Case 1 had more obvious momentum downwash and transformer wind in the two cases. The decline of Ri along with increasing vertical wind shear and unstable stratification aroused and downstream transferred the sandstorm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信