{"title":"计算机科学与软件工程教育的相关性调查","authors":"Timothy Lethbridge","doi":"10.1109/CSEE.1998.658300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe a study of 168 software professionals to determine how relevant their education has been to their careers. Starting with a list of 57 topics, we asked the participants to indicate how much they learned in university, how much they know now, how useful the material has been and whether they would like to learn more. We conclude from the results that certain software engineering topics should be given more emphasis, while the emphasis on certain mathematics topics should be changed.","PeriodicalId":112237,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 11th Conference on Software Engineering Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"87","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of the relevance of computer science and software engineering education\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Lethbridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSEE.1998.658300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We describe a study of 168 software professionals to determine how relevant their education has been to their careers. Starting with a list of 57 topics, we asked the participants to indicate how much they learned in university, how much they know now, how useful the material has been and whether they would like to learn more. We conclude from the results that certain software engineering topics should be given more emphasis, while the emphasis on certain mathematics topics should be changed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 11th Conference on Software Engineering Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"87\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 11th Conference on Software Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEE.1998.658300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 11th Conference on Software Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEE.1998.658300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A survey of the relevance of computer science and software engineering education
We describe a study of 168 software professionals to determine how relevant their education has been to their careers. Starting with a list of 57 topics, we asked the participants to indicate how much they learned in university, how much they know now, how useful the material has been and whether they would like to learn more. We conclude from the results that certain software engineering topics should be given more emphasis, while the emphasis on certain mathematics topics should be changed.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
