区块链智能合约漏洞调查

Huma Jamshed, Ansha Zahid, Rizwan Ul Hassan, Ahmad Hussain, N. Islam
{"title":"区块链智能合约漏洞调查","authors":"Huma Jamshed, Ansha Zahid, Rizwan Ul Hassan, Ahmad Hussain, N. Islam","doi":"10.31645/jisrc.22.20.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trustworthy smart contracts is usually challenging due to the multifaceted semantics of essential domain-specific languages and their testability. A vulnerability in smart contracts possibly comprises numerous code-security and may allow an attacker to gain control of a system resulting in financial tribulations. Therefore, it is very essential to design safe and secure smart contracts in blockchain’s immutable environment by applying numerous techniques for assessing flaws before deployment. Application programmers building smart contracts must test their code for vulnerabilities. Security and privacy is top in the list. The objective of this research is to explore: 1) the emerging landscape of smart contracts, 2) identifies the vulnerabilities faced by the developers and 3) What tools are available to address these issues? Our study showed: 1) comprehensive realistic studies in the smart contract security are at present lagging as related to primary studies. 2) 73% of contracts implemented in Solidity had security vulnerabilities. 3) Poor programming technique and 4) Slack programming activity.","PeriodicalId":412730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey On Vulnerabilities In Blockchain’s Smart Contracts\",\"authors\":\"Huma Jamshed, Ansha Zahid, Rizwan Ul Hassan, Ahmad Hussain, N. Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.31645/jisrc.22.20.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trustworthy smart contracts is usually challenging due to the multifaceted semantics of essential domain-specific languages and their testability. A vulnerability in smart contracts possibly comprises numerous code-security and may allow an attacker to gain control of a system resulting in financial tribulations. Therefore, it is very essential to design safe and secure smart contracts in blockchain’s immutable environment by applying numerous techniques for assessing flaws before deployment. Application programmers building smart contracts must test their code for vulnerabilities. Security and privacy is top in the list. The objective of this research is to explore: 1) the emerging landscape of smart contracts, 2) identifies the vulnerabilities faced by the developers and 3) What tools are available to address these issues? Our study showed: 1) comprehensive realistic studies in the smart contract security are at present lagging as related to primary studies. 2) 73% of contracts implemented in Solidity had security vulnerabilities. 3) Poor programming technique and 4) Slack programming activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31645/jisrc.22.20.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31645/jisrc.22.20.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于基本领域特定语言的多面语义及其可测试性,值得信赖的智能合约通常具有挑战性。智能合约中的漏洞可能包含许多代码安全,并可能允许攻击者获得对系统的控制,从而导致财务困境。因此,在区块链的不可变环境中设计安全可靠的智能合约是非常重要的,方法是在部署前应用多种技术来评估缺陷。构建智能合约的应用程序程序员必须测试他们的代码是否存在漏洞。安全和隐私是最重要的。本研究的目的是探讨:1)智能合约的新兴前景,2)识别开发人员面临的漏洞,以及3)有哪些工具可以解决这些问题?我们的研究表明:1)目前对智能合约安全的全面的现实研究相对于初步的研究比较滞后。2)在Solidity中实施的合约中有73%存在安全漏洞。3)糟糕的编程技术和4)懒散的编程活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survey On Vulnerabilities In Blockchain’s Smart Contracts
Trustworthy smart contracts is usually challenging due to the multifaceted semantics of essential domain-specific languages and their testability. A vulnerability in smart contracts possibly comprises numerous code-security and may allow an attacker to gain control of a system resulting in financial tribulations. Therefore, it is very essential to design safe and secure smart contracts in blockchain’s immutable environment by applying numerous techniques for assessing flaws before deployment. Application programmers building smart contracts must test their code for vulnerabilities. Security and privacy is top in the list. The objective of this research is to explore: 1) the emerging landscape of smart contracts, 2) identifies the vulnerabilities faced by the developers and 3) What tools are available to address these issues? Our study showed: 1) comprehensive realistic studies in the smart contract security are at present lagging as related to primary studies. 2) 73% of contracts implemented in Solidity had security vulnerabilities. 3) Poor programming technique and 4) Slack programming activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信