经济治理系列二:阿拉伯地区竞争政策和监管的强度

D. Sumpf, Vladimir Isaila
{"title":"经济治理系列二:阿拉伯地区竞争政策和监管的强度","authors":"D. Sumpf, Vladimir Isaila","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2809569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper summarizes the finding of the survey on competition policy strength in Arab countries. For this first of a kind analysis, UNESCWA used the established OECD instrument to complement the existing global dataset on competition policy and to provide decision-makers in the Arab countries a reference measure for achievements and gaps related to competition policy, legislation and institutional structures. Building on the 2013 OECD study on Competition Law and Policy, the UNESCWA survey applies the same indicators, seeking to assess the scope, legal framework and enforcement capability of competition regimes in the Arab region.The results of the survey discussed in the previous chapters highlight that there is a clear push towards the development of competition regimes in the region and that the efforts in the Arab region are strong in comparison with the OECD average. The legal and procedural frameworks underpinning national competition policy have seen multiple reforms in the past decade, increasing the scope of activity, the investigative and enforcement powers of competition authorities in the region. Spearheaded by reforms in Morocco, Tunisia and Egypt, other countries are beginning to re-evaluate the role of antitrust regulation.Nonetheless, the survey also shows the need for improvement in terms of independence of competition authorities, procedural fairness as well as enforcement concerns. With the exception of Tunisia, all other countries have not investigated or imposed sanctions on some or all antitrust infringements related to mergers, horizontal and vertical agreements, or exclusionary conducts. Most competition authorities surveyed are nominally independent, though subject to government interference in certain aspects of the decision-making, investigative and sanctioning process. Furthermore, issues of transparency and fairness in the application of antitrust measures are observed. Decisions on antitrust infringements are often not disclosed, while the publication of investigative and decision-making processes is limited in a number of countries. In the broader context of economic governance in Arab countries, the paper testifies to the commitment of some Arab countries towards establishing better policies and the authors hope the paper contributes towards building a sustainable and fair “competition culture” to the benefit of all people in the Arab region.","PeriodicalId":424970,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets Economics: Industrial Policy & Regulation eJournal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Governance Series II - The Strength of Competition Policy and Regulation in the Arab Region\",\"authors\":\"D. Sumpf, Vladimir Isaila\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2809569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper summarizes the finding of the survey on competition policy strength in Arab countries. For this first of a kind analysis, UNESCWA used the established OECD instrument to complement the existing global dataset on competition policy and to provide decision-makers in the Arab countries a reference measure for achievements and gaps related to competition policy, legislation and institutional structures. Building on the 2013 OECD study on Competition Law and Policy, the UNESCWA survey applies the same indicators, seeking to assess the scope, legal framework and enforcement capability of competition regimes in the Arab region.The results of the survey discussed in the previous chapters highlight that there is a clear push towards the development of competition regimes in the region and that the efforts in the Arab region are strong in comparison with the OECD average. The legal and procedural frameworks underpinning national competition policy have seen multiple reforms in the past decade, increasing the scope of activity, the investigative and enforcement powers of competition authorities in the region. Spearheaded by reforms in Morocco, Tunisia and Egypt, other countries are beginning to re-evaluate the role of antitrust regulation.Nonetheless, the survey also shows the need for improvement in terms of independence of competition authorities, procedural fairness as well as enforcement concerns. With the exception of Tunisia, all other countries have not investigated or imposed sanctions on some or all antitrust infringements related to mergers, horizontal and vertical agreements, or exclusionary conducts. Most competition authorities surveyed are nominally independent, though subject to government interference in certain aspects of the decision-making, investigative and sanctioning process. Furthermore, issues of transparency and fairness in the application of antitrust measures are observed. Decisions on antitrust infringements are often not disclosed, while the publication of investigative and decision-making processes is limited in a number of countries. In the broader context of economic governance in Arab countries, the paper testifies to the commitment of some Arab countries towards establishing better policies and the authors hope the paper contributes towards building a sustainable and fair “competition culture” to the benefit of all people in the Arab region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerging Markets Economics: Industrial Policy & Regulation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerging Markets Economics: Industrial Policy & Regulation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2809569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets Economics: Industrial Policy & Regulation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2809569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文总结了阿拉伯国家竞争政策力度调查的结果。为了进行这一首次分析,西亚经社会利用经合发组织的既定工具来补充关于竞争政策的现有全球数据集,并向阿拉伯国家的决策者提供关于竞争政策、立法和体制结构方面的成就和差距的参考措施。在2013年经合组织竞争法和政策研究的基础上,西亚经社会的调查采用了相同的指标,试图评估阿拉伯区域竞争制度的范围、法律框架和执法能力。前几章讨论的调查结果突出表明,该地区明显在推动竞争制度的发展,与经合组织的平均水平相比,阿拉伯地区的努力力度很大。在过去十年中,支撑国家竞争政策的法律和程序框架经历了多次改革,扩大了该地区竞争当局的活动范围、调查和执法权力。在摩洛哥、突尼斯和埃及改革的引领下,其他国家开始重新评估反垄断监管的作用。尽管如此,调查还显示,在竞争管理机构的独立性、程序公平性以及执法问题方面,仍需改进。除突尼斯外,所有其他国家都没有对与合并、横向和纵向协议或排他行为有关的部分或全部反垄断侵权行为进行调查或实施制裁。大多数接受调查的竞争管理机构名义上是独立的,但在决策、调查和制裁过程的某些方面会受到政府的干预。此外,还观察了反垄断措施适用中的透明度和公平性问题。关于反垄断侵权的决定往往不披露,而调查和决策过程的公布在一些国家受到限制。在更广泛的阿拉伯国家经济治理背景下,本文证明了一些阿拉伯国家对建立更好政策的承诺,作者希望本文有助于建立一个可持续和公平的“竞争文化”,以造福阿拉伯地区的所有人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic Governance Series II - The Strength of Competition Policy and Regulation in the Arab Region
The present paper summarizes the finding of the survey on competition policy strength in Arab countries. For this first of a kind analysis, UNESCWA used the established OECD instrument to complement the existing global dataset on competition policy and to provide decision-makers in the Arab countries a reference measure for achievements and gaps related to competition policy, legislation and institutional structures. Building on the 2013 OECD study on Competition Law and Policy, the UNESCWA survey applies the same indicators, seeking to assess the scope, legal framework and enforcement capability of competition regimes in the Arab region.The results of the survey discussed in the previous chapters highlight that there is a clear push towards the development of competition regimes in the region and that the efforts in the Arab region are strong in comparison with the OECD average. The legal and procedural frameworks underpinning national competition policy have seen multiple reforms in the past decade, increasing the scope of activity, the investigative and enforcement powers of competition authorities in the region. Spearheaded by reforms in Morocco, Tunisia and Egypt, other countries are beginning to re-evaluate the role of antitrust regulation.Nonetheless, the survey also shows the need for improvement in terms of independence of competition authorities, procedural fairness as well as enforcement concerns. With the exception of Tunisia, all other countries have not investigated or imposed sanctions on some or all antitrust infringements related to mergers, horizontal and vertical agreements, or exclusionary conducts. Most competition authorities surveyed are nominally independent, though subject to government interference in certain aspects of the decision-making, investigative and sanctioning process. Furthermore, issues of transparency and fairness in the application of antitrust measures are observed. Decisions on antitrust infringements are often not disclosed, while the publication of investigative and decision-making processes is limited in a number of countries. In the broader context of economic governance in Arab countries, the paper testifies to the commitment of some Arab countries towards establishing better policies and the authors hope the paper contributes towards building a sustainable and fair “competition culture” to the benefit of all people in the Arab region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信