使用混合调度安全优于经典多面体调度

Ti Jin
{"title":"使用混合调度安全优于经典多面体调度","authors":"Ti Jin","doi":"10.1109/PACT.2015.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Polyhedral model is a mathematical framework for programs with affine control loops that enables complex program transformations such as loop permutation and loop tiling to achieve parallelism, data locality and energy efficiency. Polyhedral schedules are widely used by popular polyhedral compilers such as AlphaZ and PLuTo to represent program execution orders. They use barriers to enforce the correct order of execution and usually synchronizations happen more than necessarily. Current research reveals the merit of combining the classical polyhedral schedules and partially ordered schedules manually written by hands with highly target dependent point-wise synchronization mechanisms. However, derivation of a hybrid schedule is tedious and error-prone due to the possibility of deadlocks. Its deviation from any existing standard representation makes program verication the sole responsibility of the programmer. We propose techniques to automate the derivation, verification and code-generation of hybrid schedules. We also demonstrate the convenience and utility of such techniques in resolving the complications associated with current hybrid schedules.","PeriodicalId":385398,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation (PACT)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Hybrid Schedules to Safely Outperform Classical Polyhedral Schedules\",\"authors\":\"Ti Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PACT.2015.52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Polyhedral model is a mathematical framework for programs with affine control loops that enables complex program transformations such as loop permutation and loop tiling to achieve parallelism, data locality and energy efficiency. Polyhedral schedules are widely used by popular polyhedral compilers such as AlphaZ and PLuTo to represent program execution orders. They use barriers to enforce the correct order of execution and usually synchronizations happen more than necessarily. Current research reveals the merit of combining the classical polyhedral schedules and partially ordered schedules manually written by hands with highly target dependent point-wise synchronization mechanisms. However, derivation of a hybrid schedule is tedious and error-prone due to the possibility of deadlocks. Its deviation from any existing standard representation makes program verication the sole responsibility of the programmer. We propose techniques to automate the derivation, verification and code-generation of hybrid schedules. We also demonstrate the convenience and utility of such techniques in resolving the complications associated with current hybrid schedules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation (PACT)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation (PACT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACT.2015.52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation (PACT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACT.2015.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多面体模型是具有仿射控制环的程序的数学框架,可以实现复杂的程序转换,如循环排列和循环平铺,以实现并行性,数据局部性和能源效率。流行的多面体编译器(如AlphaZ和PLuTo)广泛使用多面体调度来表示程序执行顺序。它们使用屏障来强制执行正确的顺序,并且通常同步发生的次数比必要的要多。目前的研究揭示了将经典多面体调度和部分有序调度与高度目标依赖的点同步机制相结合的优点。然而,由于存在死锁的可能性,混合调度的派生过程冗长且容易出错。它与任何现有标准表示的偏差使得程序验证成为程序员的唯一责任。我们提出了一些技术来自动化混合计划的推导、验证和代码生成。我们还展示了这些技术在解决与当前混合调度相关的复杂性方面的便利性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Hybrid Schedules to Safely Outperform Classical Polyhedral Schedules
The Polyhedral model is a mathematical framework for programs with affine control loops that enables complex program transformations such as loop permutation and loop tiling to achieve parallelism, data locality and energy efficiency. Polyhedral schedules are widely used by popular polyhedral compilers such as AlphaZ and PLuTo to represent program execution orders. They use barriers to enforce the correct order of execution and usually synchronizations happen more than necessarily. Current research reveals the merit of combining the classical polyhedral schedules and partially ordered schedules manually written by hands with highly target dependent point-wise synchronization mechanisms. However, derivation of a hybrid schedule is tedious and error-prone due to the possibility of deadlocks. Its deviation from any existing standard representation makes program verication the sole responsibility of the programmer. We propose techniques to automate the derivation, verification and code-generation of hybrid schedules. We also demonstrate the convenience and utility of such techniques in resolving the complications associated with current hybrid schedules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信