保护信息法律关系主体的权利不受网络侵害

T. Mikhailina, Yu. V. Hotsuliak, Andriy Hel
{"title":"保护信息法律关系主体的权利不受网络侵害","authors":"T. Mikhailina, Yu. V. Hotsuliak, Andriy Hel","doi":"10.32849/2663-5313/2021.7.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protection of the rights of subjects of information legal relations from violations on Internet. Abstract. The purpose of the scientific article is a theoretical and applied analysis of protecting the rights of subjects of information legal relations from violations on the Internet, as well as making suggestions for eliminating individual problems. Research methods. Research methodology consists of a complex of general scientific and special methods of data acquisition, as follows: systems approach, cybernetic and synergetic methods, formal legal method, legal comparativism, and observation as the common sociological method. Results. It is noted that peculiarities of the Internet environment create significant risks to human rights violations, so they should be in state focus. This forms the basis for the solid support of the need to regulate Internet legal relations emphasizing the guarantee and protection of the participants’ rights without resorting to Internet paternalism, which impedes the technological development of the state or puts major segments of relations in the shade. Conclusions. The authors propose to change the terminological approaches and apply the phrase “protection of the rights from Internet violations” or “protection of the rights from violations on the Internet” instead of “protection of the rights on the Internet”, which mediates both the scientific side of the problem and the exclusively practical side of such protective legal relations. The article substantiates a viewpoint on the necessity to enshrine in law the obligation for transnational information companies to have an official representative office in Ukraine. The above would provide additional opportunities to protect the rights of subjects of information legal relations, incl. by litigation. At the same time, it is supported legislative initiatives on taxation of multinational information companies in Ukraine, which is now a global trend. The authors have elucidated that strict state control over the information space is possible and widely implemented in totalitarian (authoritarian) regimes, but is not tolerated by democratic societies. Self- protection measures are being strengthened within information systems, including at the corporate level. If one uses financial levers, then the means of a financial liability are most acceptable, taking into account the profits of information giants.","PeriodicalId":235919,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protection of the rights of subjects of information legal relations from violations on the internet\",\"authors\":\"T. Mikhailina, Yu. V. Hotsuliak, Andriy Hel\",\"doi\":\"10.32849/2663-5313/2021.7.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Protection of the rights of subjects of information legal relations from violations on Internet. Abstract. The purpose of the scientific article is a theoretical and applied analysis of protecting the rights of subjects of information legal relations from violations on the Internet, as well as making suggestions for eliminating individual problems. Research methods. Research methodology consists of a complex of general scientific and special methods of data acquisition, as follows: systems approach, cybernetic and synergetic methods, formal legal method, legal comparativism, and observation as the common sociological method. Results. It is noted that peculiarities of the Internet environment create significant risks to human rights violations, so they should be in state focus. This forms the basis for the solid support of the need to regulate Internet legal relations emphasizing the guarantee and protection of the participants’ rights without resorting to Internet paternalism, which impedes the technological development of the state or puts major segments of relations in the shade. Conclusions. The authors propose to change the terminological approaches and apply the phrase “protection of the rights from Internet violations” or “protection of the rights from violations on the Internet” instead of “protection of the rights on the Internet”, which mediates both the scientific side of the problem and the exclusively practical side of such protective legal relations. The article substantiates a viewpoint on the necessity to enshrine in law the obligation for transnational information companies to have an official representative office in Ukraine. The above would provide additional opportunities to protect the rights of subjects of information legal relations, incl. by litigation. At the same time, it is supported legislative initiatives on taxation of multinational information companies in Ukraine, which is now a global trend. The authors have elucidated that strict state control over the information space is possible and widely implemented in totalitarian (authoritarian) regimes, but is not tolerated by democratic societies. Self- protection measures are being strengthened within information systems, including at the corporate level. If one uses financial levers, then the means of a financial liability are most acceptable, taking into account the profits of information giants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2021.7.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2021.7.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护信息法律关系主体的权利不受网络侵害。摘要这篇科学文章的目的是对保护信息法律关系主体的权利不受网络侵害进行理论和应用分析,并为消除个别问题提出建议。研究方法。研究方法论是由一般科学方法和特殊的数据获取方法组成的综合体,包括:系统方法、控制论和协同方法、形式法律方法、法律比较主义和作为常见社会学方法的观察。结果。值得注意的是,互联网环境的特殊性给侵犯人权行为带来了重大风险,因此应成为国家关注的重点。这为规范网络法律关系提供了坚实的基础,强调保障和保护参与者的权利,而不是诉诸于阻碍国家技术发展或使关系的主要部分黯然失色的网络家长式作风。结论。作者建议改变术语方法,用“网络侵权权利的保护”或“网络侵权权利的保护”来代替“网络权利的保护”,这既调解了问题的科学方面,又调解了这种保护法律关系的专门实践方面。本文就跨国信息公司在乌克兰设立正式代表机构的义务应以法律形式规定的必要性提出了自己的观点。上述情况将提供更多的机会,包括通过诉讼保护信息法律关系主体的权利。与此同时,它支持关于乌克兰跨国信息公司征税的立法倡议,这现在是一种全球趋势。作者已经阐明,对信息空间的严格国家控制是可能的,并且在极权(专制)政权中广泛实施,但在民主社会中是不能容忍的。信息系统内部的自我保护措施正在加强,包括在公司一级。如果使用金融杠杆,那么考虑到信息巨头的利润,金融负债的手段是最可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protection of the rights of subjects of information legal relations from violations on the internet
Protection of the rights of subjects of information legal relations from violations on Internet. Abstract. The purpose of the scientific article is a theoretical and applied analysis of protecting the rights of subjects of information legal relations from violations on the Internet, as well as making suggestions for eliminating individual problems. Research methods. Research methodology consists of a complex of general scientific and special methods of data acquisition, as follows: systems approach, cybernetic and synergetic methods, formal legal method, legal comparativism, and observation as the common sociological method. Results. It is noted that peculiarities of the Internet environment create significant risks to human rights violations, so they should be in state focus. This forms the basis for the solid support of the need to regulate Internet legal relations emphasizing the guarantee and protection of the participants’ rights without resorting to Internet paternalism, which impedes the technological development of the state or puts major segments of relations in the shade. Conclusions. The authors propose to change the terminological approaches and apply the phrase “protection of the rights from Internet violations” or “protection of the rights from violations on the Internet” instead of “protection of the rights on the Internet”, which mediates both the scientific side of the problem and the exclusively practical side of such protective legal relations. The article substantiates a viewpoint on the necessity to enshrine in law the obligation for transnational information companies to have an official representative office in Ukraine. The above would provide additional opportunities to protect the rights of subjects of information legal relations, incl. by litigation. At the same time, it is supported legislative initiatives on taxation of multinational information companies in Ukraine, which is now a global trend. The authors have elucidated that strict state control over the information space is possible and widely implemented in totalitarian (authoritarian) regimes, but is not tolerated by democratic societies. Self- protection measures are being strengthened within information systems, including at the corporate level. If one uses financial levers, then the means of a financial liability are most acceptable, taking into account the profits of information giants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信