设计和进行实验室实验

Elena Katok
{"title":"设计和进行实验室实验","authors":"Elena Katok","doi":"10.1002/9781119138341.CH1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Operations management (OM) is a field with strong tradition of analytical modeling. Most of the early analytical work in OM was primarily optimization based and dealt with central planning for such problems as job‐shop scheduling, lot sizing, and queuing. Starting in the 1980s, OM researchers became interested in modeling strategic settings that involve interactions between firms. Today, OM models tackle problems that deal with supply chain coordination, competition, and cooperation, which examine incentives and objectives of firms as well as individual decision makers. This type of work requires a model of decision‐making at individual and/or firm level. Supply chains are not centralized, but consist of individual self‐interested firms – original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), different tiers of suppliers, transportation vendors, and retailers. These firms face uncertainty from the environment, such as production yield, processing times, and customer demand, as well as strategic uncertainty, which comes from the uncertainty about the actions of the other supply chain members. Traditionally, OM models assumed that firms are expected profit maximizers and are fully rational, meaning that they correctly anticipate the actions of the other supply chain members. Behavioral operations management (BOM) started in order to first test, and then improve, modeling assumptions about decision‐making. Schweitzer and Cachon (2000) is the seminal BOM paper that tested how individuals solve the “newsvendor problem.” It turned out that individuals generally do not solve the problem correctly, but are rather systematic and predictable in how their Designing and Conducting Laboratory Experiments","PeriodicalId":249420,"journal":{"name":"The Handbook of Behavioral Operations","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing and Conducting Laboratory Experiments\",\"authors\":\"Elena Katok\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9781119138341.CH1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Operations management (OM) is a field with strong tradition of analytical modeling. Most of the early analytical work in OM was primarily optimization based and dealt with central planning for such problems as job‐shop scheduling, lot sizing, and queuing. Starting in the 1980s, OM researchers became interested in modeling strategic settings that involve interactions between firms. Today, OM models tackle problems that deal with supply chain coordination, competition, and cooperation, which examine incentives and objectives of firms as well as individual decision makers. This type of work requires a model of decision‐making at individual and/or firm level. Supply chains are not centralized, but consist of individual self‐interested firms – original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), different tiers of suppliers, transportation vendors, and retailers. These firms face uncertainty from the environment, such as production yield, processing times, and customer demand, as well as strategic uncertainty, which comes from the uncertainty about the actions of the other supply chain members. Traditionally, OM models assumed that firms are expected profit maximizers and are fully rational, meaning that they correctly anticipate the actions of the other supply chain members. Behavioral operations management (BOM) started in order to first test, and then improve, modeling assumptions about decision‐making. Schweitzer and Cachon (2000) is the seminal BOM paper that tested how individuals solve the “newsvendor problem.” It turned out that individuals generally do not solve the problem correctly, but are rather systematic and predictable in how their Designing and Conducting Laboratory Experiments\",\"PeriodicalId\":249420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Handbook of Behavioral Operations\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Handbook of Behavioral Operations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119138341.CH1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Handbook of Behavioral Operations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119138341.CH1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

运营管理(OM)是一个具有强大分析建模传统的领域。大多数早期的管理分析工作主要是基于优化的,并处理诸如作业车间调度、批量大小和排队等问题的中央规划。从20世纪80年代开始,OM的研究人员开始对涉及企业之间互动的战略设置建模感兴趣。今天,OM模型处理的问题是处理供应链协调、竞争和合作,它检查企业以及个体决策者的动机和目标。这种类型的工作需要在个人和/或公司层面的决策模型。供应链不是集中的,而是由个体的自利企业组成的——原始设备制造商(oem)、不同层次的供应商、运输供应商和零售商。这些企业面临着来自环境的不确定性,如产量、加工时间和客户需求,以及来自其他供应链成员行动的不确定性的战略不确定性。传统上,OM模型假设企业是预期利润最大化者,并且是完全理性的,这意味着它们正确地预测了其他供应链成员的行为。行为操作管理(BOM)的开始是为了首先测试,然后改进,关于决策的建模假设。Schweitzer和Cachon(2000)是一篇开创性的BOM论文,它测试了个体如何解决“报贩问题”。结果表明,个人通常不能正确地解决问题,但在如何设计和实施实验室实验方面,他们是相当系统和可预测的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing and Conducting Laboratory Experiments
Operations management (OM) is a field with strong tradition of analytical modeling. Most of the early analytical work in OM was primarily optimization based and dealt with central planning for such problems as job‐shop scheduling, lot sizing, and queuing. Starting in the 1980s, OM researchers became interested in modeling strategic settings that involve interactions between firms. Today, OM models tackle problems that deal with supply chain coordination, competition, and cooperation, which examine incentives and objectives of firms as well as individual decision makers. This type of work requires a model of decision‐making at individual and/or firm level. Supply chains are not centralized, but consist of individual self‐interested firms – original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), different tiers of suppliers, transportation vendors, and retailers. These firms face uncertainty from the environment, such as production yield, processing times, and customer demand, as well as strategic uncertainty, which comes from the uncertainty about the actions of the other supply chain members. Traditionally, OM models assumed that firms are expected profit maximizers and are fully rational, meaning that they correctly anticipate the actions of the other supply chain members. Behavioral operations management (BOM) started in order to first test, and then improve, modeling assumptions about decision‐making. Schweitzer and Cachon (2000) is the seminal BOM paper that tested how individuals solve the “newsvendor problem.” It turned out that individuals generally do not solve the problem correctly, but are rather systematic and predictable in how their Designing and Conducting Laboratory Experiments
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信