文件上因疏忽而加盖伪造印章的合法性

B. Djaja
{"title":"文件上因疏忽而加盖伪造印章的合法性","authors":"B. Djaja","doi":"10.14710/dilrev.7.2.2022.192-211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the last amendment was in force in 2000, the tariff charged for stamp duty has not been adjusted to suit the most recent monetary value up until Law No. 10 of 2020 on Stamp Duty was issued. In addition to tariff adjustment, the new Law also stipulates the levy of stamp duty on digital documents, which have become increasingly popular used in the recent years, with the expectation of boosting the inflow of State revenue generated from the levy of stamp duty. Nonetheless, the rampant distribution of illegal, forged stamps, aside of inflicting material losses on the State finance due to non-optimum revenue generation, also give rise to uncertainty amongst laypersons with regards to the legality of the document concerned. A document found to have used a forged stamp shall be considered legally equal to an unstamped document, leaving thereupon an obligation due for settlement prior to the document being eligible for use, which should be rectified through an administrative means called “pemeteraian kemudian/subsequent stamp” (nazegelen).","PeriodicalId":432511,"journal":{"name":"Diponegoro Law Review","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE LEGALITY OF DOCUMENTS NEGLIGENTLY AFFIXED WITH FORGED STAMPS\",\"authors\":\"B. Djaja\",\"doi\":\"10.14710/dilrev.7.2.2022.192-211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the last amendment was in force in 2000, the tariff charged for stamp duty has not been adjusted to suit the most recent monetary value up until Law No. 10 of 2020 on Stamp Duty was issued. In addition to tariff adjustment, the new Law also stipulates the levy of stamp duty on digital documents, which have become increasingly popular used in the recent years, with the expectation of boosting the inflow of State revenue generated from the levy of stamp duty. Nonetheless, the rampant distribution of illegal, forged stamps, aside of inflicting material losses on the State finance due to non-optimum revenue generation, also give rise to uncertainty amongst laypersons with regards to the legality of the document concerned. A document found to have used a forged stamp shall be considered legally equal to an unstamped document, leaving thereupon an obligation due for settlement prior to the document being eligible for use, which should be rectified through an administrative means called “pemeteraian kemudian/subsequent stamp” (nazegelen).\",\"PeriodicalId\":432511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diponegoro Law Review\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diponegoro Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.7.2.2022.192-211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diponegoro Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.7.2.2022.192-211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自上一次修订于2000年生效以来,直到2020年《印花税法》第10号颁布之前,印花税征收的关税一直没有进行调整,以适应最新的货币价值。除了调整关税外,新税法还规定对近年来日益普及的数字文件征收印花税,以期增加征收印花税带来的国家收入流入。尽管如此,非法、伪造邮票的猖獗分发,除了由于收入不佳而给国家财政造成重大损失外,还使外行对有关文件的合法性产生不确定。被发现使用伪造印章的文件在法律上应被视为与未盖章的文件平等,因此在该文件具有使用资格之前,应留下一项应付义务,应通过一种称为“pemeteraian kemudian/后续印章”(nazegelen)的行政手段予以纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE LEGALITY OF DOCUMENTS NEGLIGENTLY AFFIXED WITH FORGED STAMPS
Since the last amendment was in force in 2000, the tariff charged for stamp duty has not been adjusted to suit the most recent monetary value up until Law No. 10 of 2020 on Stamp Duty was issued. In addition to tariff adjustment, the new Law also stipulates the levy of stamp duty on digital documents, which have become increasingly popular used in the recent years, with the expectation of boosting the inflow of State revenue generated from the levy of stamp duty. Nonetheless, the rampant distribution of illegal, forged stamps, aside of inflicting material losses on the State finance due to non-optimum revenue generation, also give rise to uncertainty amongst laypersons with regards to the legality of the document concerned. A document found to have used a forged stamp shall be considered legally equal to an unstamped document, leaving thereupon an obligation due for settlement prior to the document being eligible for use, which should be rectified through an administrative means called “pemeteraian kemudian/subsequent stamp” (nazegelen).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信