SET50指数期权市场效率和SET50指数期权合约调整的看涨和看跌蝶式价差检验

W. Jongadsayakul
{"title":"SET50指数期权市场效率和SET50指数期权合约调整的看涨和看跌蝶式价差检验","authors":"W. Jongadsayakul","doi":"10.18178/IJTEF.2018.9.3.597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract—This paper tests the efficiency of SET50 Index Options market and investigates the impact of contract adjustment on market efficiency. The options data set I employ to conduct call & put butterfly spreads test of market efficiency covers the period from October 29, 2007 to December 30, 2016. When I ignore transaction costs, the results report frequent and substantial violations of pricing relationships. For an option maturing within 90 days, size of violations tends to be higher for options farther from the money or further away from expiration. Almost no violations remain after considering the bid-ask spread as transaction costs. Therefore, our results support the efficiency of SET50 Index Options market before and after the modification of contract specification. Comparing the results before and after contract adjustment, I do not observe any improvement of market efficiency after the modification of contract.","PeriodicalId":381210,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Call & Put Butterfly Spreads Test of SET50 Index Options Market Efficiency and SET50 Index Options Contract Adjustment\",\"authors\":\"W. Jongadsayakul\",\"doi\":\"10.18178/IJTEF.2018.9.3.597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract—This paper tests the efficiency of SET50 Index Options market and investigates the impact of contract adjustment on market efficiency. The options data set I employ to conduct call & put butterfly spreads test of market efficiency covers the period from October 29, 2007 to December 30, 2016. When I ignore transaction costs, the results report frequent and substantial violations of pricing relationships. For an option maturing within 90 days, size of violations tends to be higher for options farther from the money or further away from expiration. Almost no violations remain after considering the bid-ask spread as transaction costs. Therefore, our results support the efficiency of SET50 Index Options market before and after the modification of contract specification. Comparing the results before and after contract adjustment, I do not observe any improvement of market efficiency after the modification of contract.\",\"PeriodicalId\":381210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18178/IJTEF.2018.9.3.597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/IJTEF.2018.9.3.597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文对SET50指数期权市场的效率进行了检验,并考察了合约调整对市场效率的影响。我使用期权数据集进行看涨和看跌蝶式价差市场效率检验,涵盖的时间段为2007年10月29日至2016年12月30日。当我忽略交易成本时,结果会报告频繁且实质性地违反定价关系。对于在90天内到期的期权,期权的违约规模往往越大,期权离资金越远,或离到期日越远。将买卖价差作为交易成本考虑后,几乎不存在违规行为。因此,我们的研究结果支持SET50指数期权市场在合约规范修改前后的效率。对比合同调整前后的结果,我没有观察到合同修改后市场效率有任何提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Call & Put Butterfly Spreads Test of SET50 Index Options Market Efficiency and SET50 Index Options Contract Adjustment
Abstract—This paper tests the efficiency of SET50 Index Options market and investigates the impact of contract adjustment on market efficiency. The options data set I employ to conduct call & put butterfly spreads test of market efficiency covers the period from October 29, 2007 to December 30, 2016. When I ignore transaction costs, the results report frequent and substantial violations of pricing relationships. For an option maturing within 90 days, size of violations tends to be higher for options farther from the money or further away from expiration. Almost no violations remain after considering the bid-ask spread as transaction costs. Therefore, our results support the efficiency of SET50 Index Options market before and after the modification of contract specification. Comparing the results before and after contract adjustment, I do not observe any improvement of market efficiency after the modification of contract.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信