可在FPGA设计流程中集成的SCA和DFA联合对策

S. Bhasin, J. Danger, Florent Flament, T. Graba, S. Guilley, Y. Mathieu, Maxime Nassar, L. Sauvage, Nidhal Selmane
{"title":"可在FPGA设计流程中集成的SCA和DFA联合对策","authors":"S. Bhasin, J. Danger, Florent Flament, T. Graba, S. Guilley, Y. Mathieu, Maxime Nassar, L. Sauvage, Nidhal Selmane","doi":"10.1109/ReConFig.2009.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main challenge when implementing cryptographic algorithms in hardware is to protect them against attacks that target directly the device. Two strategies are customarily employed by malevolent adversaries: observation and differential perturbation attacks, also called SCA and DFA in the abundant scientific literature on this topic. Numerous research efforts have been carried out to defeat respectively SCA or DFA. However, few publications deal with concomitant protection against both threats. The current consensus is to devise algorithmic countermeasures to DFA and subsequently to synthesize the DFA-protected design thanks to a DPA-resistant CAD flow. In this article, we put to the fore that this approach is the best neither in terms of performance nor of relevance. Notably, the contribution of this paper is to demonstrate that the strongest SCA countermeasure known so far, namely the dual-rail with precharge logic styles that do not evaluate early, happen surprisingly to be almost natively immune to most DFAs. Therefore, unexpected two-in-one solutions against SCA and DFA indeed exist and deserve a closer attention, because they ally simplicity with efficiency. In particular, we illustrate a logic style, called WDDL without early evaluation (WDDL w/o EE), and a design flow that realizes in practice one possible combined DPA and DFA counter-measure especially suited for reconfigurable hardware.","PeriodicalId":325631,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Reconfigurable Computing and FPGAs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined SCA and DFA Countermeasures Integrable in a FPGA Design Flow\",\"authors\":\"S. Bhasin, J. Danger, Florent Flament, T. Graba, S. Guilley, Y. Mathieu, Maxime Nassar, L. Sauvage, Nidhal Selmane\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ReConFig.2009.50\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main challenge when implementing cryptographic algorithms in hardware is to protect them against attacks that target directly the device. Two strategies are customarily employed by malevolent adversaries: observation and differential perturbation attacks, also called SCA and DFA in the abundant scientific literature on this topic. Numerous research efforts have been carried out to defeat respectively SCA or DFA. However, few publications deal with concomitant protection against both threats. The current consensus is to devise algorithmic countermeasures to DFA and subsequently to synthesize the DFA-protected design thanks to a DPA-resistant CAD flow. In this article, we put to the fore that this approach is the best neither in terms of performance nor of relevance. Notably, the contribution of this paper is to demonstrate that the strongest SCA countermeasure known so far, namely the dual-rail with precharge logic styles that do not evaluate early, happen surprisingly to be almost natively immune to most DFAs. Therefore, unexpected two-in-one solutions against SCA and DFA indeed exist and deserve a closer attention, because they ally simplicity with efficiency. In particular, we illustrate a logic style, called WDDL without early evaluation (WDDL w/o EE), and a design flow that realizes in practice one possible combined DPA and DFA counter-measure especially suited for reconfigurable hardware.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 International Conference on Reconfigurable Computing and FPGAs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 International Conference on Reconfigurable Computing and FPGAs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ReConFig.2009.50\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Reconfigurable Computing and FPGAs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ReConFig.2009.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

在硬件中实现加密算法的主要挑战是保护它们免受直接针对设备的攻击。恶意攻击者通常采用两种策略:观察和微分扰动攻击,在有关该主题的大量科学文献中也称为SCA和DFA。已经进行了大量的研究工作来分别击败SCA或DFA。然而,很少有出版物涉及同时防范这两种威胁。目前的共识是设计DFA的算法对策,随后合成DFA保护的设计,这要归功于抗dpa的CAD流。在本文中,我们首先指出,这种方法无论是在性能方面还是在相关性方面都是最好的。值得注意的是,本文的贡献是证明了迄今为止已知的最强SCA对策,即不进行早期评估的带有预充逻辑样式的双轨,令人惊讶地几乎对大多数dfa具有天然免疫力。因此,针对SCA和DFA的意想不到的二合一解决方案确实存在,并且值得进一步关注,因为它们将简单性与效率结合起来。特别地,我们说明了一种逻辑风格,称为无早期评估的WDDL (WDDL w/o EE),以及一个设计流程,该流程在实践中实现了一种可能的组合DPA和DFA对抗措施,特别适合于可重构硬件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined SCA and DFA Countermeasures Integrable in a FPGA Design Flow
The main challenge when implementing cryptographic algorithms in hardware is to protect them against attacks that target directly the device. Two strategies are customarily employed by malevolent adversaries: observation and differential perturbation attacks, also called SCA and DFA in the abundant scientific literature on this topic. Numerous research efforts have been carried out to defeat respectively SCA or DFA. However, few publications deal with concomitant protection against both threats. The current consensus is to devise algorithmic countermeasures to DFA and subsequently to synthesize the DFA-protected design thanks to a DPA-resistant CAD flow. In this article, we put to the fore that this approach is the best neither in terms of performance nor of relevance. Notably, the contribution of this paper is to demonstrate that the strongest SCA countermeasure known so far, namely the dual-rail with precharge logic styles that do not evaluate early, happen surprisingly to be almost natively immune to most DFAs. Therefore, unexpected two-in-one solutions against SCA and DFA indeed exist and deserve a closer attention, because they ally simplicity with efficiency. In particular, we illustrate a logic style, called WDDL without early evaluation (WDDL w/o EE), and a design flow that realizes in practice one possible combined DPA and DFA counter-measure especially suited for reconfigurable hardware.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信