病毒性脑炎。

P Toltzis
{"title":"病毒性脑炎。","authors":"P Toltzis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonherpetic encephalitis outside the newborn period is usually a self-limited disease. The majority of patients will recover without significant sequelae, and require only supportive therapy during the acute illness. Though the underlying viral etiology frequently will escape detection, identification of the infecting agent has considerable prognostic value which can complement clinical measures of severity of disease. The most important initial task of the clinician faced with a case of presumptive viral encephalitis is to eliminate the possibility of a treatable illness. Once this has been done, the diagnosis of viral encephalitis can be supported by documenting the characteristic slow-wave background activity on EEG, and a mild lymphocellular pleocytosis in the CSF. Because viral encephalitis can be caused by such a large number of organisms, the search for an etiology can be daunting. Realizing that all the agents described above can, at times, cause encephalitis without any clue to their identity, one nevertheless may use several pieces of historical information to narrow the possibilities. Travel history, animal exposures, immunization history, and seasonality all may help to steer the search in a particular direction and, indeed, may point to a nonvirologic cause as well. In addition, detection of extraneurological signs and symptoms may strongly indicate a specific virologic diagnosis. Finally, knowledge of concurrent community epidemic patterns, and of surveillance data routinely collected by local and state health departments, can help to increase or decrease the likelihood of a given pathogen. The causative viral agent usually can be identified by serological testing and viral culture. Occasionally, single serological determinations are diagnostic: in rabies (when the patient has not received immune prophylaxis), eastern equine encephalitis, and HIV, since seropositivity is strongly associated with symptomatic illness; and in Epstein-Barr virus, if a panel of antibody determinations which can time the infection is available. In addition, high CSF: serum titers for antibody against any neurotropic agent is usually diagnostic, though the absence of a high central nervous system antibody titer does not eliminate any potential viral pathogen. With these few exceptions, a single serological determination for a given pathogen is almost always impossible to interpret; paired sera (one obtained upon diagnosis, and one obtained 10 to 14 days later, either just prior to hospital discharge or at a follow-up visit) are far more helpful. Many viruses that directly infect the central nervous system are difficult to recover from the CSF; therefore, viral isolation from the nasopharynx and stool also should be sought.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":76980,"journal":{"name":"Advances in pediatric infectious diseases","volume":"6 ","pages":"111-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viral encephalitis.\",\"authors\":\"P Toltzis\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nonherpetic encephalitis outside the newborn period is usually a self-limited disease. The majority of patients will recover without significant sequelae, and require only supportive therapy during the acute illness. Though the underlying viral etiology frequently will escape detection, identification of the infecting agent has considerable prognostic value which can complement clinical measures of severity of disease. The most important initial task of the clinician faced with a case of presumptive viral encephalitis is to eliminate the possibility of a treatable illness. Once this has been done, the diagnosis of viral encephalitis can be supported by documenting the characteristic slow-wave background activity on EEG, and a mild lymphocellular pleocytosis in the CSF. Because viral encephalitis can be caused by such a large number of organisms, the search for an etiology can be daunting. Realizing that all the agents described above can, at times, cause encephalitis without any clue to their identity, one nevertheless may use several pieces of historical information to narrow the possibilities. Travel history, animal exposures, immunization history, and seasonality all may help to steer the search in a particular direction and, indeed, may point to a nonvirologic cause as well. In addition, detection of extraneurological signs and symptoms may strongly indicate a specific virologic diagnosis. Finally, knowledge of concurrent community epidemic patterns, and of surveillance data routinely collected by local and state health departments, can help to increase or decrease the likelihood of a given pathogen. The causative viral agent usually can be identified by serological testing and viral culture. Occasionally, single serological determinations are diagnostic: in rabies (when the patient has not received immune prophylaxis), eastern equine encephalitis, and HIV, since seropositivity is strongly associated with symptomatic illness; and in Epstein-Barr virus, if a panel of antibody determinations which can time the infection is available. In addition, high CSF: serum titers for antibody against any neurotropic agent is usually diagnostic, though the absence of a high central nervous system antibody titer does not eliminate any potential viral pathogen. With these few exceptions, a single serological determination for a given pathogen is almost always impossible to interpret; paired sera (one obtained upon diagnosis, and one obtained 10 to 14 days later, either just prior to hospital discharge or at a follow-up visit) are far more helpful. Many viruses that directly infect the central nervous system are difficult to recover from the CSF; therefore, viral isolation from the nasopharynx and stool also should be sought.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in pediatric infectious diseases\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"111-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in pediatric infectious diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in pediatric infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新生儿期以外的非疱疹性脑炎通常是一种自限性疾病。大多数患者会康复,没有明显的后遗症,在急性疾病期间只需要支持性治疗。虽然潜在的病毒病因经常无法检测,但感染因子的鉴定具有相当大的预后价值,可以补充疾病严重程度的临床测量。临床医生面对疑似病毒性脑炎病例时,最重要的首要任务是消除这种可治疗疾病的可能性。一旦这样做,可以通过记录脑电图特征性的慢波背景活动和脑脊液轻度淋巴细胞增多症来支持病毒性脑炎的诊断。由于病毒性脑炎可以由如此多的生物体引起,因此寻找病因可能令人望而生畏。意识到上述所有因素有时会导致脑炎,而对它们的身份没有任何线索,尽管如此,人们还是可以利用一些历史信息来缩小可能性。旅行史、动物接触史、免疫史和季节性都可能有助于引导研究向特定方向发展,实际上也可能指向非病毒学原因。此外,检测外神经体征和症状可能强烈提示特定的病毒学诊断。最后,了解同时发生的社区流行病模式,以及地方和州卫生部门例行收集的监测数据,可以帮助增加或减少特定病原体的可能性。病原通常可以通过血清学检测和病毒培养来确定。偶尔,单一血清学检测可用于诊断:狂犬病(当患者未接受免疫预防时)、东部马脑炎和艾滋病毒,因为血清学阳性与症状性疾病密切相关;对于爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒,如果有抗体检测小组可以确定感染时间。此外,高CSF:血清抗任何嗜神经剂抗体滴度通常用于诊断,尽管缺乏高中枢神经系统抗体滴度并不能消除任何潜在的病毒病原体。除了这些少数例外,对给定病原体的单一血清学测定几乎总是不可能解释的;配对血清(一份在诊断时获得,另一份在10至14天后,出院前或随访时获得)的帮助要大得多。许多直接感染中枢神经系统的病毒很难从脑脊液中恢复;因此,还应寻求从鼻咽和粪便中分离病毒。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viral encephalitis.

Nonherpetic encephalitis outside the newborn period is usually a self-limited disease. The majority of patients will recover without significant sequelae, and require only supportive therapy during the acute illness. Though the underlying viral etiology frequently will escape detection, identification of the infecting agent has considerable prognostic value which can complement clinical measures of severity of disease. The most important initial task of the clinician faced with a case of presumptive viral encephalitis is to eliminate the possibility of a treatable illness. Once this has been done, the diagnosis of viral encephalitis can be supported by documenting the characteristic slow-wave background activity on EEG, and a mild lymphocellular pleocytosis in the CSF. Because viral encephalitis can be caused by such a large number of organisms, the search for an etiology can be daunting. Realizing that all the agents described above can, at times, cause encephalitis without any clue to their identity, one nevertheless may use several pieces of historical information to narrow the possibilities. Travel history, animal exposures, immunization history, and seasonality all may help to steer the search in a particular direction and, indeed, may point to a nonvirologic cause as well. In addition, detection of extraneurological signs and symptoms may strongly indicate a specific virologic diagnosis. Finally, knowledge of concurrent community epidemic patterns, and of surveillance data routinely collected by local and state health departments, can help to increase or decrease the likelihood of a given pathogen. The causative viral agent usually can be identified by serological testing and viral culture. Occasionally, single serological determinations are diagnostic: in rabies (when the patient has not received immune prophylaxis), eastern equine encephalitis, and HIV, since seropositivity is strongly associated with symptomatic illness; and in Epstein-Barr virus, if a panel of antibody determinations which can time the infection is available. In addition, high CSF: serum titers for antibody against any neurotropic agent is usually diagnostic, though the absence of a high central nervous system antibody titer does not eliminate any potential viral pathogen. With these few exceptions, a single serological determination for a given pathogen is almost always impossible to interpret; paired sera (one obtained upon diagnosis, and one obtained 10 to 14 days later, either just prior to hospital discharge or at a follow-up visit) are far more helpful. Many viruses that directly infect the central nervous system are difficult to recover from the CSF; therefore, viral isolation from the nasopharynx and stool also should be sought.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信