“孩子不是小大人”——儿童道德的独特性

Robert C. Macauley, R. Hain
{"title":"“孩子不是小大人”——儿童道德的独特性","authors":"Robert C. Macauley, R. Hain","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198821311.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinicians working in paediatric palliative care encounter many of the same practical ethical quandaries that face colleagues working in the adult specialty. While the underlying moral principles must be the same, their application to children is often distinctive and ethics is an illustration that ‘children are not small adults’. The key ethical test is the child’s interests; the benefits that an intervention will offer relative to its harms. Establishing them, however, is often not straightforward, and there is a risk that interests become abstracted from the context of a caring relationship that defines the state of being a child. In this chapter we consider a number of specific challenges in paediatric ethics at the end of life: the source of authority in medical decision making, ethics of research in children, collusion (especially in older children and young adults), the principle of double effect (PDE), and euthanasia.","PeriodicalId":383589,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Care for Children","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Children are not small adults’—the distinctiveness of ethics in children\",\"authors\":\"Robert C. Macauley, R. Hain\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/med/9780198821311.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinicians working in paediatric palliative care encounter many of the same practical ethical quandaries that face colleagues working in the adult specialty. While the underlying moral principles must be the same, their application to children is often distinctive and ethics is an illustration that ‘children are not small adults’. The key ethical test is the child’s interests; the benefits that an intervention will offer relative to its harms. Establishing them, however, is often not straightforward, and there is a risk that interests become abstracted from the context of a caring relationship that defines the state of being a child. In this chapter we consider a number of specific challenges in paediatric ethics at the end of life: the source of authority in medical decision making, ethics of research in children, collusion (especially in older children and young adults), the principle of double effect (PDE), and euthanasia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Care for Children\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Care for Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198821311.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Textbook of Palliative Care for Children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198821311.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从事儿科姑息治疗的临床医生遇到了许多与从事成人专科工作的同事相同的实际伦理困境。虽然潜在的道德原则必须是相同的,但它们对儿童的应用往往是不同的,道德是“儿童不是小大人”的例证。关键的伦理测试是孩子的兴趣;干预所带来的好处相对于它的危害。然而,建立它们往往不是直截了当的,而且有一种风险,即兴趣从定义儿童状态的关怀关系的背景中抽象出来。在本章中,我们考虑了生命结束时儿科伦理的一些具体挑战:医疗决策的权威来源,儿童研究的伦理,勾结(特别是在年龄较大的儿童和年轻人中),双重效应原则(PDE)和安乐死。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Children are not small adults’—the distinctiveness of ethics in children
Clinicians working in paediatric palliative care encounter many of the same practical ethical quandaries that face colleagues working in the adult specialty. While the underlying moral principles must be the same, their application to children is often distinctive and ethics is an illustration that ‘children are not small adults’. The key ethical test is the child’s interests; the benefits that an intervention will offer relative to its harms. Establishing them, however, is often not straightforward, and there is a risk that interests become abstracted from the context of a caring relationship that defines the state of being a child. In this chapter we consider a number of specific challenges in paediatric ethics at the end of life: the source of authority in medical decision making, ethics of research in children, collusion (especially in older children and young adults), the principle of double effect (PDE), and euthanasia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信