国际商事仲裁中的费用担保

W. Gu
{"title":"国际商事仲裁中的费用担保","authors":"W. Gu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3200080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I present the existing legal rules surrounding security for costs in international arbitration by performing a representative survey of national arbitration laws and institutional rules of both common law and civil law jurisdictions, across legal regimes of different theoretical perspectives. I then turn to the effect of policy considerations on the evaluation of desirability of ordering security for costs, as well as the amount and the procedures of offering security for costs. Lastly, I review the experiences across the globe and argue that amid the global trend in favor of arbitration, there needs to be a more unified procedural regime across jurisdictions in security for costs to allow international commercial arbitration to evolve towards greater flexibility and efficiency while accounting for the commercial need of legal certainty.","PeriodicalId":313622,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Security for Costs in International Commercial Arbitration\",\"authors\":\"W. Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3200080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I present the existing legal rules surrounding security for costs in international arbitration by performing a representative survey of national arbitration laws and institutional rules of both common law and civil law jurisdictions, across legal regimes of different theoretical perspectives. I then turn to the effect of policy considerations on the evaluation of desirability of ordering security for costs, as well as the amount and the procedures of offering security for costs. Lastly, I review the experiences across the globe and argue that amid the global trend in favor of arbitration, there needs to be a more unified procedural regime across jurisdictions in security for costs to allow international commercial arbitration to evolve towards greater flexibility and efficiency while accounting for the commercial need of legal certainty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3200080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3200080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在本文中,我通过对英美法系和大陆法系司法管辖区的国家仲裁法和制度规则进行具有代表性的调查,跨越不同理论视角的法律制度,介绍了围绕国际仲裁成本担保的现有法律规则。然后,我转向政策考虑对评估为成本订购担保的可取性的影响,以及为成本提供担保的数量和程序。最后,我回顾了全球的经验,并认为在有利于仲裁的全球趋势下,需要在成本保障方面建立一个跨司法管辖区更统一的程序制度,以使国际商事仲裁朝着更大的灵活性和效率发展,同时考虑到法律确定性的商业需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Security for Costs in International Commercial Arbitration
In this article, I present the existing legal rules surrounding security for costs in international arbitration by performing a representative survey of national arbitration laws and institutional rules of both common law and civil law jurisdictions, across legal regimes of different theoretical perspectives. I then turn to the effect of policy considerations on the evaluation of desirability of ordering security for costs, as well as the amount and the procedures of offering security for costs. Lastly, I review the experiences across the globe and argue that amid the global trend in favor of arbitration, there needs to be a more unified procedural regime across jurisdictions in security for costs to allow international commercial arbitration to evolve towards greater flexibility and efficiency while accounting for the commercial need of legal certainty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信