媒体的客观性:社会来源可信度的视角

{"title":"媒体的客观性:社会来源可信度的视角","authors":"","doi":"10.56536/jmes.v1i.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People's desire to learn about what's going on in their communities via social media has sparked a slew of comparison studies on the news credibility of newspaper, social media and television in general. The reliability of news sources such as social media, television, and newspapers was compared in this study. The study included both focus group discussions and surveys as part of its research approach. The researcher's theoretical basis for the study was framing theory. The study's findings indicate that respondents' level of education and familiarity with the internet have an effect on the news they choose and believe. Similarly, the majority of individuals rely on a secondary source of information after being exposed to their preferred source of information in order to verify the veracity of a news article. In addition, the study found that people who thought TV and newspaper news was more credible than social media did so because well-trained people make the news in newspapers and on TV, and there are processes in place to make sure the news is accurate and objective. Significant theoretical and practical ramifications flow from how people evaluate news organizations in terms of their reliability and credibility.","PeriodicalId":154005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media and Entrepreneurial Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OBJECTIVITY IN MEDIA: A PERSPECTIVE OF SOURCE CREDIBILITY IN SOCIETY\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.56536/jmes.v1i.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"People's desire to learn about what's going on in their communities via social media has sparked a slew of comparison studies on the news credibility of newspaper, social media and television in general. The reliability of news sources such as social media, television, and newspapers was compared in this study. The study included both focus group discussions and surveys as part of its research approach. The researcher's theoretical basis for the study was framing theory. The study's findings indicate that respondents' level of education and familiarity with the internet have an effect on the news they choose and believe. Similarly, the majority of individuals rely on a secondary source of information after being exposed to their preferred source of information in order to verify the veracity of a news article. In addition, the study found that people who thought TV and newspaper news was more credible than social media did so because well-trained people make the news in newspapers and on TV, and there are processes in place to make sure the news is accurate and objective. Significant theoretical and practical ramifications flow from how people evaluate news organizations in terms of their reliability and credibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Media and Entrepreneurial Studies\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Media and Entrepreneurial Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56536/jmes.v1i.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media and Entrepreneurial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56536/jmes.v1i.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们希望通过社交媒体了解社区正在发生的事情,这引发了一系列关于报纸、社交媒体和电视新闻可信度的比较研究。本研究比较了社交媒体、电视和报纸等新闻来源的可靠性。该研究包括焦点小组讨论和调查作为其研究方法的一部分。研究者进行这项研究的理论基础是框架理论。研究结果表明,受访者的教育程度和对互联网的熟悉程度对他们选择和相信的新闻有影响。同样,大多数人在接触到自己喜欢的信息来源后,会依赖第二手信息来源来验证新闻文章的真实性。此外,研究发现,认为电视和报纸新闻比社交媒体更可信的人之所以这样做,是因为受过良好训练的人在报纸和电视上制作新闻,并且有适当的流程来确保新闻准确和客观。人们如何评价新闻机构的可靠性和可信度,产生了重大的理论和实践影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OBJECTIVITY IN MEDIA: A PERSPECTIVE OF SOURCE CREDIBILITY IN SOCIETY
People's desire to learn about what's going on in their communities via social media has sparked a slew of comparison studies on the news credibility of newspaper, social media and television in general. The reliability of news sources such as social media, television, and newspapers was compared in this study. The study included both focus group discussions and surveys as part of its research approach. The researcher's theoretical basis for the study was framing theory. The study's findings indicate that respondents' level of education and familiarity with the internet have an effect on the news they choose and believe. Similarly, the majority of individuals rely on a secondary source of information after being exposed to their preferred source of information in order to verify the veracity of a news article. In addition, the study found that people who thought TV and newspaper news was more credible than social media did so because well-trained people make the news in newspapers and on TV, and there are processes in place to make sure the news is accurate and objective. Significant theoretical and practical ramifications flow from how people evaluate news organizations in terms of their reliability and credibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信