R. Beigel, M. Bellare, J. Feigenbaum, S. Goldwasser
{"title":"语言比它们的证明更容易","authors":"R. Beigel, M. Bellare, J. Feigenbaum, S. Goldwasser","doi":"10.1109/SFCS.1991.185343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Languages in NP are presented for which it is harder to prove membership interactively than it is to decide this membership. Similarly, languages where checking is harder than computing membership are presented. Under assumptions about triple-exponential time, incoherent sets in NP are constructed. Without any assumptions, incoherent sets are constructed in DSPACE (n to the log n), yielding the first uncheckable and non-random-self-reducible sets in that space.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":320781,"journal":{"name":"[1991] Proceedings 32nd Annual Symposium of Foundations of Computer Science","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Languages that are easier than their proofs\",\"authors\":\"R. Beigel, M. Bellare, J. Feigenbaum, S. Goldwasser\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SFCS.1991.185343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Languages in NP are presented for which it is harder to prove membership interactively than it is to decide this membership. Similarly, languages where checking is harder than computing membership are presented. Under assumptions about triple-exponential time, incoherent sets in NP are constructed. Without any assumptions, incoherent sets are constructed in DSPACE (n to the log n), yielding the first uncheckable and non-random-self-reducible sets in that space.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":320781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1991] Proceedings 32nd Annual Symposium of Foundations of Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1991] Proceedings 32nd Annual Symposium of Foundations of Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1991.185343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1991] Proceedings 32nd Annual Symposium of Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1991.185343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Languages in NP are presented for which it is harder to prove membership interactively than it is to decide this membership. Similarly, languages where checking is harder than computing membership are presented. Under assumptions about triple-exponential time, incoherent sets in NP are constructed. Without any assumptions, incoherent sets are constructed in DSPACE (n to the log n), yielding the first uncheckable and non-random-self-reducible sets in that space.<>