基于指数、基于模型和混合触发的个人和行业损失基础风险评估的实证研究

Frederick Anning
{"title":"基于指数、基于模型和混合触发的个人和行业损失基础风险评估的实证研究","authors":"Frederick Anning","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3248015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The absolute value of the distinguishing factor that exist between losses employed in triggering the occurrences of CAT bonds and the exact losses for an insurer is considered Basis Risk. This kind of risk is not only related to insurers only but also CAT bond investors as well. This is because both parties somewhat may suffer from the loss of basis risk. It is noteworthy that Basis risk could be considered a zero-sum game for both counterparties i.e. investors and insurers respectively when there is a trade in of CAT bonds.","PeriodicalId":150881,"journal":{"name":"SIRN: International Comparisons (Social) (Sub-Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Review of Basis Risk Assessment of Triggers i.e. Index, Model-Based and the Hybrid Triggers in Lieu of Individual and Industry Losses\",\"authors\":\"Frederick Anning\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3248015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The absolute value of the distinguishing factor that exist between losses employed in triggering the occurrences of CAT bonds and the exact losses for an insurer is considered Basis Risk. This kind of risk is not only related to insurers only but also CAT bond investors as well. This is because both parties somewhat may suffer from the loss of basis risk. It is noteworthy that Basis risk could be considered a zero-sum game for both counterparties i.e. investors and insurers respectively when there is a trade in of CAT bonds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIRN: International Comparisons (Social) (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIRN: International Comparisons (Social) (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3248015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIRN: International Comparisons (Social) (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3248015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在触发CAT债券发生的损失与保险公司的确切损失之间存在的区别因素的绝对值被认为是基差风险。这种风险不仅与保险公司有关,也与CAT债券投资者有关。这是因为双方在某种程度上都可能遭受基差损失的风险。值得注意的是,当交易CAT债券时,对于交易双方(即投资者和保险公司)而言,基差风险可以被视为零和游戏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Review of Basis Risk Assessment of Triggers i.e. Index, Model-Based and the Hybrid Triggers in Lieu of Individual and Industry Losses
The absolute value of the distinguishing factor that exist between losses employed in triggering the occurrences of CAT bonds and the exact losses for an insurer is considered Basis Risk. This kind of risk is not only related to insurers only but also CAT bond investors as well. This is because both parties somewhat may suffer from the loss of basis risk. It is noteworthy that Basis risk could be considered a zero-sum game for both counterparties i.e. investors and insurers respectively when there is a trade in of CAT bonds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信