数字分类器系统更新学习策略的基准测试

D. Barbuzzi, D. Impedovo, G. Pirlo
{"title":"数字分类器系统更新学习策略的基准测试","authors":"D. Barbuzzi, D. Impedovo, G. Pirlo","doi":"10.1109/ICFHR.2012.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three different strategies in order to re-train classifiers, when new labeled data become available, are presented in a multi-expert scenario. The first method is the use of the entire new dataset. The second one is related to the consideration that each single classifier is able to select new samples starting from those on which it performs a missclassification. Finally, by inspecting the multi expert system behavior, a sample misclassified by an expert, is used to update that classifier only if it produces a miss-classification by the ensemble of classifiers. This paper provides a comparison of three approaches under different conditions on two state of the art classifiers (SVM and Naive Bayes) by taking into account four different combination techniques. Experiments have been performed by considering the CEDAR (handwritten digit) database. It is shown how results depend by the amount of the new training samples, as well as by the specific combination decision schema and by classifiers in the ensemble.","PeriodicalId":291062,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking of update learning strategies on digit classifier systems\",\"authors\":\"D. Barbuzzi, D. Impedovo, G. Pirlo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICFHR.2012.186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three different strategies in order to re-train classifiers, when new labeled data become available, are presented in a multi-expert scenario. The first method is the use of the entire new dataset. The second one is related to the consideration that each single classifier is able to select new samples starting from those on which it performs a missclassification. Finally, by inspecting the multi expert system behavior, a sample misclassified by an expert, is used to update that classifier only if it produces a miss-classification by the ensemble of classifiers. This paper provides a comparison of three approaches under different conditions on two state of the art classifiers (SVM and Naive Bayes) by taking into account four different combination techniques. Experiments have been performed by considering the CEDAR (handwritten digit) database. It is shown how results depend by the amount of the new training samples, as well as by the specific combination decision schema and by classifiers in the ensemble.\",\"PeriodicalId\":291062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFHR.2012.186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFHR.2012.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

当新的标记数据可用时,在多专家场景中提出了三种不同的重新训练分类器的策略。第一种方法是使用整个新数据集。第二个问题与考虑到每个分类器都能够从执行错误分类的样本中选择新样本有关。最后,通过检查多专家系统的行为,使用被专家错误分类的样本,只有当它产生由分类器集成的错误分类时,才会更新该分类器。本文通过考虑四种不同的组合技术,对两种最先进的分类器(SVM和朴素贝叶斯)在不同条件下的三种方法进行了比较。实验考虑了雪松(手写数字)数据库。它显示了结果如何取决于新训练样本的数量,以及特定的组合决策模式和集成中的分类器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benchmarking of update learning strategies on digit classifier systems
Three different strategies in order to re-train classifiers, when new labeled data become available, are presented in a multi-expert scenario. The first method is the use of the entire new dataset. The second one is related to the consideration that each single classifier is able to select new samples starting from those on which it performs a missclassification. Finally, by inspecting the multi expert system behavior, a sample misclassified by an expert, is used to update that classifier only if it produces a miss-classification by the ensemble of classifiers. This paper provides a comparison of three approaches under different conditions on two state of the art classifiers (SVM and Naive Bayes) by taking into account four different combination techniques. Experiments have been performed by considering the CEDAR (handwritten digit) database. It is shown how results depend by the amount of the new training samples, as well as by the specific combination decision schema and by classifiers in the ensemble.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信